When Were Asbestos’ Dangers First Known?

Asbestos may have first been used four thousand years ago in lamps and candles. Since then, many exploited the mineral fibers’ strength and fire- and heat-resistant properties in thousands of products over the centuries. Along with the mining, processing, use, and manufacture of asbestos products came the diseases caused by inhaling and swallowing the fibers.

Ancient Greeks and Romans documented health problems of those who mined asbestos from stone quarries. Greek geographer Strabo wrote about a “sickness of the lungs” of slaves weaving asbestos into cloth. Roman historian Pliny the Elder wrote of the “disease of slaves.” He also described how miners used a thin membrane from a goat or lamb’s bladder to prevent inhaling asbestos fibers as they worked.

The modern world re-learned asbestos’ dangers over time, according to a 2004 article in the Postgraduate Medical Journal, which lists the published findings of medical research that gradually painted the grim picture of what those using asbestos faced.

British Researchers and Occupational Safety Officials Take the Lead

The first medical paper on potential asbestos dangers was published in the British Medical Journal in 1924. Pathologist William Cooke wrote it. It briefly discussed the illness and death caused by lung fibrosis and tuberculosis suffered by Nellie Kershaw. She worked in a factory making asbestos products. Other papers soon followed.

In 1928, Britain’s factory inspectorate investigated asbestos’ dangers after a case of pulmonary fibrosis of a Glasgow asbestos worker became known. Their job was to determine if his disease was linked to his work and whether others faced similar risks.

Edward Merewether, a medical inspector, wrote his findings in October 1929. He found that:

  • Occupational asbestos dust exposure, especially for extended periods at high concentrations, was a ‘‘definite occupational risk among asbestos workers as a class’’
  • Lung fibrosis that may result might cause ‘‘complete disablement’’ and death
  • He endorsed the view publicly expressed a few months earlier that a ‘‘new’’ disease, pulmonary asbestosis, had been discovered
  • Asbestos was the cause of a new, preventable, fatal disease
  • Dust control could significantly lengthen the time someone working with asbestos may develop fibrosis, and, over time, as control measures improved, may end the threat completely

Merewether’s colleague, the engineering inspector of factories, Charles Price, investigated and suggested practical measures to control asbestos dust. National regulations were enacted in 1931 in Britain. Dust control measures in factories started in 1933.

It was believed these actions would prevent health problems in factory workers. Cases of asbestosis dropped, but the rest of the world didn’t follow Britain’s dust-control actions. It’s as if their lessons learned were ignored.

The Links Between Asbestos, Cancer, and Mesothelioma Becomes Known

A few isolated cases of asbestosis in insulation workers were reported in medical journals as early as the 1930s. Suspicion that it might cause lung cancer started that decade. This belief became more persuasive in the 1940s with the publishing of more studies.

In 1955, Richard Doll established a causal association between asbestosis and lung cancer. He shared the common belief that despite his findings, asbestos products could continue to be manufactured safely if workplace safety measures continued and improved.

During the 1950s, South African researchers J C Wagner, Christopher Sleggs, and Paul Marchand started identifying mesothelioma cases in Griqualand West, where crocidolite asbestos was mined. Cases in other mining areas weren’t found, so there was a belief that asbestos wasn’t the cause.

Papers published between 1960 and 1962 stated there was a “possible association” between pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Research published in 1964 and 1965 caused the general medical recognition that mesothelioma was an asbestos-related disease.

One article stated that by ”the end of 1965 it was clear that asbestos workers are at special risk of developing…mesothelioma.” Asbestos dust (at least certain types) was widely believed to be a principal, if not the only, mesothelioma cause.

Research Published in the 1960s Starts to Show the Scope of the Problem

Also in the 1960s:

  • It was shown that asbestos-related diseases weren’t limited to workers heavily exposed in asbestos factories. Those suffering from these diseases included insulation workers, users of other asbestos-containing products, and people living near asbestos factories
  • There were suggestions that people living in cities and towns far from asbestos mines or factories might be in danger because they lived among vehicles and buildings containing asbestos
  • In Britain, despite its regulations, showed some evidence asbestos-related diseases weren’t declining and may have increased
  • Irving J. Selikoff of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City and his colleagues produced many study results showing insulators who worked with asbestos material in the US faced an ”important risk” of developing asbestosis, lung cancer, or mesothelioma, and possibly gastrointestinal cancer

Asbestos-related diseases started attracting more press attention in the 1960s as well. In 1969, the first third-party products liability lawsuit claiming personal injury from asbestos was filed in the US. This was the beginning of an eventual avalanche of legal actions that led to the bankruptcy of most US companies involved with asbestos.

Call Us Today For A Free Consultation

Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, attorneys are your boots on the ground if you or a family member you love suffers from mesothelioma or another asbestos-related illness in Kentucky. To reach our office in Louisville, call us at 855-385-9532. You can also complete our contact form for a free initial consultation where we can discuss possible compensation for the harm you suffer.

Asbestos’ Unequal Burden on Low and Middle Income Families

Most of those exposed to asbestos and cancer stricken  by it worked for a living. They primarily worked in construction trades, manufacturing plants, in steel plants, power plants, or  repaired vehicles. For many victims, their spouses performed  such work.

The threats of living in a home or apartment containing asbestos also skew towards those of lower income. Asbestos-related illness and death aren’t just related to mineral fibers that are inhaled or ingested. It’s linked to how wealthy you are.

An article published by the federal Department of Health and Human Services discusses the health risks facing Americans with lower incomes in older homes that contain asbestos.

Asbestos Products in Older Homes and Buildings in Poor Neighborhoods

People in low-income neighborhoods face many health challenges. Food deserts offer few, affordable, healthy food choices to residents. Those using Medicaid have fewer treatment options, especially if they need specialized medical treatment. Housing may contain lead paint and be near industrial areas that emit pollution.

People who are low-income earners and those in minority neighborhoods endure unequal exposure to dangerous chemicals and substances. It should come as no surprise that residents of poorer communities are exposed to contaminants (including asbestos) at a higher rate than those in wealthier neighborhoods.

Asbestos Abatement is Expensive. Who Will Pay for It?

While asbestos use largely (but not completely) ceased in the 1980s, prior use of asbestos-containing building materials can be present in older homes, and removal is often expensive.

If you’re living paycheck to paycheck, asbestos in your basement isn’t your greatest concern. The last thing many landlords in low-rent areas want to do is invest more money into their properties, so asbestos abatement is the last thing on their “to-do list” if it’s on there at all. Asbestos products in these buildings continue to age and deteriorate, emitting more fibers into these homes.

The average cost for residential asbestos abatement can range from $1,000 to $3,000 but go much higher depending on the situation. Those of low income and their landlords are unwilling or unable to spend that kind of money. It’s a lot of money in a country where one study estimates that a quarter of the US population has no retirement savings.

Asbestos’ Dangers Go Beyond Buildings to Entire Neighborhoods

Asbestos is dangerous. It’s so toxic there’s no accepted safe level of exposure. You could also be continuously exposed to asbestos fibers, but symptoms of a related disease and a diagnosis may not occur for decades. After fibers embed in the lungs, they can result in lung cancer, mesothelioma, and asbestosis.

The problem is more than just isolated homes or businesses. Entire neighborhoods may deal with asbestos and other toxic substances. A 2015 Urban Institute study found that low-income areas often have a greater risk of industrial or hazardous land use. Some East Cleveland residents face piles of discarded materials (including asbestos). This won’t happen in an upscale neighborhood anywhere in the US.

Cities have abandoned properties where asbestos was never adequately addressed. These are public health time bombs for those living nearby or just walking in the area. Given the hazards, safe demolition may be prohibitively expensive. If these properties catch fire, residents and firefighters are exposed to asbestos fibers as structures collapse and burn.

Your Local Mesothelioma Law Firm

If you or a loved one are diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, or you work at a site known for asbestos exposure and fear the health consequences, you should understand your rights to compensation for the harm asbestos causes.

Experienced Satterley & Kelley’s, PLLC, asbestos injury lawyers can discuss your situation and help you recover damages to cover your medical expenses, lost wages, and the pain and suffering you’ve endured. To schedule a free initial consultation at our Louisville office, call us toll-free at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form today.

I Have an Asbestos-Related Disease, But I Don’t Know What I Was Exposed To

It’s been decades since many of our clients were at worksites with asbestos. Some, but not all, clearly remember what products they, and others around them, used. Others didn’t work with asbestos products, but others around them did, and they didn’t pay much attention to discarded packaging at the worksite. Can you file a claim with an asbestos trust fund or sue a company that sold asbestos products if you’re unsure of which products injured you?

Satterley & Kelley PLLC attorneys have represented victims of asbestos exposure and asbestos-related diseases for more than 25 years. If you or a family member are diagnosed with mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, or another condition caused by asbestos, call us at 855-385-9532 to learn about your legal rights and compensation for the harm you suffered.

A Company or Trust Fund Won’t Pay Unless There is Evidence Its Product Played a Role in Causing Your Illness

To recover compensation through a claim against a bankruptcy trust, you must provide evidence of your diagnosis of an asbestos-related disease and proof you were exposed to products from the bankrupt company.

For some of these trusts, proof of exposure may be enough if:

  • You worked at a particular job site during a specific time frame
  • Performed a certain type of work involving asbestos or
  • Had regular contact with the work clothing of someone who did such work

In a lawsuit, the amount and quality of evidence needed for a successful claim is more demanding. You must plead and prove specific legal claims, including if you didn’t directly work with a company’s products, you were at least exposed to them.

Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, Has Documented Which Products Were Used, and Where

We have hundreds of photos of different asbestos products. You can go through them to see if any look familiar to jog your memory. This way, you can contribute to the evidence needed for your case.

But evidence need not come directly from you. Our attorneys have handled hundreds of asbestos-related claims and lawsuits involving worksites across Kentucky. As a result,  we have a detailed and far-reaching library of information, including a list of job sites in Kentucky where asbestos was used.

After we nail down where you worked and when, we can search through evidence in prior cases to determine what evidence we have of which asbestos products you may have been exposed to. This could be documentary evidence of what products were shipped where, and which contractors bought what.

Testimony given during trials or depositions can also be very helpful. If you worked for Allied Chemical in Ashland, for example, we have copies of deposition testimony by those who worked with asbestos products stating what they used and when. With the help of documents and depositions, we can connect the dots and develop a strong case supporting your claim or lawsuit.

Another option is reaching out to former co-workers who may have useful information.

Get the Help You Need From Attorneys You Can Trust

If you’re diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, you may be entitled to compensation through a personal injury or asbestos trust fund claim. Satterley & Kelley PLLC has recovered millions of dollars in settlements and verdicts throughout Kentucky, and we can help you too. Let us be your boots on the ground.

If you have questions, contact us to schedule a free initial consultation with our experienced asbestos injury attorneys. To make an appointment, call our office in Louisville at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form.

Lung Cancer and Asbestos

Asbestos can cause many kinds of cancers. One of the more common ones is lung cancer. If you’re exposed to asbestos, you may inhale fibers into your lungs. They become stuck, your immune system can’t destroy them, and fibers cause genetic changes in the surrounding tissue over years or decades. The result is malignant tumors in your lungs.

What is Asbestos?

Asbestos is a naturally occurring fibrous mineral. Due to its strength, heat, and fire resistance, asbestos was widely used in building materials and other products for decades. Asbestos fibers are released into the air when products are first installed if they become damaged, as they age, and if they’re removed.

Fibers remain suspended in the air and can enter your lungs if inhaled. Asbestos can damage your lungs, including lung cancer, asbestosis (lung scarring and inflammation that restricts breathing), and pleural mesothelioma (an aggressive cancer of the lung’s linings). Because of its health risks, asbestos use is heavily restricted but still legal for some purposes.

How are People Exposed to Asbestos?

Until the 1980s, in the US, asbestos was a common ingredient in many products, including:

  • Insulation
  • Roofing
  • Siding shingles
  • Floor tiles
  • Acoustic ceiling tiles
  • Wallboard
  • Textured paints
  • Heat-resistant fabrics
  • Automotive parts
  • Electrical equipment
  • Cosmetic body powders

Older homes, commercial buildings, industrial sites, and schools are common places to find asbestos. Those most at risk of asbestos-related lung cancer include:

  • Asbestos miners
  • Asbestos abatement workers
  • Custodial and maintenance workers
  • Insulation workers
  • Those working in steel mills and aluminum smelters
  • Chemical plant workers
  • Vehicle and train mechanics
  • Pipefitters
  • Electricians
  • Boilermakers
  • Millwrights
  • Railroad workers

Others working in the same area were also exposed to asbestos fibers. Often, these workers returned home from work in clothes covered with asbestos, exposing those they lived with. Asbestos fibers in the air are inhaled or swallowed. They become lodged in many parts of the body, especially the lungs.

What is Lung Cancer?

Lung cancer begins as abnormal growth of lung cells, the two organs in the chest controlling breathing. Lung cancer is the top cause of cancer deaths worldwide, primarily due to tobacco use.

Does Asbestos Cause Lung Cancer?

Two main types of studies substantiate the fact asbestos fibers cause lung cancer:

  • Studies involving people or epidemiologic studies
  • Lab studies that involve lab animals or cells in lab dishes

Evidence from both studies shows that asbestos can significantly increase the risk of lung cancer, especially if the person previously smoked tobacco.

Inhaling asbestos fibers is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer in studies of workers exposed to asbestos. This higher risk involves all forms of asbestos, and the greater the exposure, the higher the risk. Most asbestos-related lung cancer cases develop at least a decade after the first exposure.

How Does Asbestos Cause Lung Cancer?

Asbestos’ presence in the lungs leads to chronic inflammation and scarring of the lung tissue. Asbestos fibers irritate the tissue, and the body’s immune system tries to destroy them. They’re too durable, and the white cells around them break open, spilling enzymes into the area and causing more scarring and inflammation.

Asbestos fibers also cause genetic damage in lung cells. DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid, is a molecule found in the cells of all living organisms, including humans. It’s the genetic blueprint or code containing instructions necessary for living organisms’ growth, development, functioning, and reproduction. DNA has a central role in our heredity and biological processes.

The presence of asbestos fibers and lung inflammation may lead to DNA mutations, which may result in uncontrolled cell growth and lung cancer. The damaged lung cells become malignant, forming tumors that may spread (or metastasize) to other body parts.

How Does Smoking Affect the Risk of Lung Cancer for Those Exposed to Asbestos?

Many studies show that the combination of asbestos exposure and smoking is particularly dangerous. Smokers exposed to asbestos have a lung cancer risk greater than the risks from asbestos and smoking added together, according to the National Cancer Institute. Stopping smoking reduces the lung cancer risk of those exposed to asbestos.

Why You Should Hire Satterley & Kelley, PLLC for Your Asbestos Case

If you’re diagnosed with lung cancer or another asbestos-related cancer, you may be entitled to compensation for what you’ve endured. This includes physical and mental pain and suffering, financial costs, medical bills, and how the disease impacts your relationships.

You need a law firm with experience representing victims taking legal action against the asbestos industry. Satterley & Kelley, PLLC lawyers have helped asbestos victims for more than 20 years.

We have relationships with the best experts in the world to help us prove that asbestos caused your injury and the physical, emotional, psychological, and financial harm you suffered.

Our attorneys will give your case the full investigation it deserves. We never assume your case will settle, so we don’t take shortcuts. Satterley & Kelley, PLLC will carefully analyze the facts of your case and decide on and execute an effective strategy that can provide you with the most compensation possible.

Call Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, Today For A Free Initial Consultation

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with lung cancer after asbestos exposure, you may be entitled to financial compensation for your hardship. Call us at 855-385-9532 or contact us online to arrange a free initial consultation with a lawyer. We will discuss your situation, your best legal options, and how we can help.

 

Should Owners of Asbestos Companies Be Criminally Charged?

Italian courts think so. While it’s extremely rare for someone in charge of a US corporation to be charged with crimes, it’s even more unusual if one is convicted. That’s not the case in Italy.

Asbestos is a naturally occurring mineral fiber used for centuries in thousands of products. If fibers become airborne when the products are made, installed, age, or removed, they can be inhaled or swallowed. The fibers become lodged in the body’s organs, where they can cause fatal cancers, including mesothelioma, over years or decades.

For years, executives running companies making and selling asbestos-containing products knew the fibers caused debilitating and fatal health conditions. Still, they failed to protect its workers, those buying and using these products. Their greed led to countless deaths over many years, often decades after a person’s asbestos exposure ended.

Former Cement Company Owner Sentenced for Manslaughter

A Swiss billionaire was sentenced to 12 years in jail in June after his conviction on aggravated manslaughter charges. His crimes relate to the deaths of 392 people caused by asbestos exposure, according to The Guardian. It’s considered the most significant workplace death trial in Italy.

Stephan Schmidheiny, 73, a Swiss man and the former principal shareholder of the cement company Eternit Italia, was sentenced in a Novara court. He was found guilty of causing the deaths of 392 people in Casale Monferrato, the town that, until 1986, was the location of the largest of Eternit Italia’s six factories.

The victims include 60 factory workers. The rest lived in the town and surrounding area. The factory’s waste was crushed outside its buildings. The wind blew asbestos dust across the town.

Schmidheiny, not the company, was charged and tried because, under Italian law, a firm’s owner is responsible for workplace accidents or deaths.

Eternit’s factories made asbestos-containing cement during the 1970s and 1980s. Schmidheiny managed the Casale Monferrato plant from 1976 to its closure. The company went bankrupt in 1986.

In addition to the jail time, judges ordered him to pay the equivalent of:

  • $53.4 million in provisional damages to Casale Monferrato’s local authority
  • $32 million to the Italian state
  • $534 million to a local association for relatives of asbestos victims

Schmidheiny’s lawyer, Astolfo Di Amato, stated his client would appeal. Di Amato, apparently ever the optimist, also said he was “very pleased” that the verdict meant Schmidheiny couldn’t be considered an “intentional murderer.”

Prosecutor Gianfranco Colace asked the court for a life sentence and argued that the defendant knew that asbestos exposure could be lethal but failed to protect workers or those living near the plant.

Schmideiny faced criminal charges in the past, reports Forbes. The Italian Supreme Court in 2014 quashed a 16-year sentence for Schmidheiny’s 2012 conviction in a Turin court. He was convicted for his role in the deaths of more than 3,000 people allegedly exposed to Eternit’s asbestos-containing building materials in Italy.

Italian Tire Maker Executives Found Guilty of Manslaughter

A Milan court in 2015 gave 11 former Pirelli corporate board members, including two ex-CEOs, jail terms of up to seven years and eight months for manslaughter due to their roles in causing 20 asbestos-related factory worker deaths. According to the BBC, the defendants managed Pirelli between 1979 and 1989 when plant workers were exposed to asbestos at the company’s Milan factory.

A year later, a Milan court acquitted nine other former Pirelli managers of manslaughter and causing grave harm in factory workers’ asbestos-related deaths or illnesses, according to the Associated Press.

Pirelli is a global tire-making company which started in Milan in 1872. It has factories in 12 countries. It has about $7 billion in revenues in 2022, according to the company’s website.

The tire-making process starts with pouring rubber into molds. Steam is applied to melt the rubber in molds, presses, or autoclaves. The equipment used to heat the rubber contained many asbestos-containing parts, including brakes, boards, and insulation. The tire molds were lined with talc, which likely  contains asbestos, so that tires could be easily removed.

Get Help If You Are Diagnosed With Mesothelioma

If you have been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, you should focus on your medical care and quality of life while we protect your right to compensation for the harm you suffer.

People who contracted mesothelioma or other severe illnesses due to asbestos cement or while working at a tire plant may be entitled to compensation for medical treatment, lost work, pain and suffering, and other losses. To get help, contact us at Satterley & Kelley, PLLC today. We’ll talk with you about your situation and help you decide your course of action.

Why is Asbestos Still Legal in the US? Greed, Politics, and Indifference to Worker Safety

More than 60 countries worldwide have banned the importation, sale, and use of asbestos. The United States is not one of them. We are the wealthiest country on the planet by gross domestic product, but enough people in positions of power claim we can’t afford the costs of stopping asbestos use. While a handful of corporations benefit from exposing workers to this deadly substance, workers bear the costs.

While dozens of countries entirely banned asbestos, the US has not. The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) tried to do so in 1989, but the effort was overturned two years later in federal court.

Money, Political Power, and Asbestos

US and state chemical regulations emphasize keeping businesses humming with little interference, impacting the health of ordinary Americans who carry the burden. There are chemical plants in the country still using asbestos, so fibers fly across workplaces about a hundred years after evidence of asbestos’ hazards started being documented.

Efforts by some Congressional members to outlaw this carcinogen have repeatedly failed. The main reason is opposition by the country’s chemical industry. It imports more than 200,000 pounds of asbestos annually to use in plants producing chlorine used to treat water.

The Chemical Industry Talks a Good Game, But Reality is Another Thing

The industry falsely claims workers are well protected by strict safety measures and strong workplace safety regulations, so there’s no need for a ban. ProPublica reports published in October documented that OxyChem routinely violated basic asbestos safety rules in its Niagara Falls, New York plant:

  • Safety standards were routinely disregarded
  • Workers allege asbestos splattered on the ceilings and walls, rolled across the floor like tumbleweeds, and stuck to workers’ clothes
  • Windows and doors were open, so asbestos blew into the neighboring area
  • OxyChem’s industrial hygiene monitoring showed workers repeatedly endured airborne asbestos in the workplace

The Niagara Falls plant closed last year, but eight other US plants still use asbestos to manufacture chlorine. Olin Corporation owns one of them, according to ProPublica.

‘…Chris Murphy, a former union president at Olin’s plant in Alabama, said the conditions there mirrored the ones described by the workers in Niagara Falls. He said he himself had seen asbestos caked on beams and cranes in recent years and been told to remove it with a putty knife. “There ain’t nothing to it,” he remembered his managers saying. “You’ll be all right. It ain’t that bad.” He wasn’t told to wear protective gear, he said, so he didn’t.’

The conditions were similar to those industrial workers may have endured in the 1930s.

Ending Asbestos Use, One Way or Another

Legislation, passed in 2016, is supposed to address the continuing issue of workplace asbestos exposure. Following the law, the EPA started re-evaluating the risks of using asbestos. In 2020, they determined chlorine workers faced an “unreasonable risk” to their health.

The EPA proposed an asbestos ban in April, and this administrative rule needs to be finalized, which could happen in November. The EPA will hear the chemical industry’s objections as part of the process. Attorneys general in twelve states back them, claiming an asbestos ban would put a “heavy and unreasonable burden” on the industry.

Chemical companies would rather endanger workers than modernize their facilities to produce chlorine without using asbestos. OxyChem has slowly upgraded some plants to a newer technology. It built an asbestos-free chlorine plant in 2014.

The CEO of Olin Corp., Scott Sutton, wrote a letter to the EPA in April stating the company would endorse a ban if companies have seven years to phase out asbestos use. The letter states workers would not have to apply asbestos to screening equipment in the last five years of the phase-out period, reducing exposure, and there would be no need for additional asbestos imports.

A proposed law to permanently ban the importation and use of asbestos in the US, the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, is pending in Congress, according to ProPublica. The legislation is  named for Alan Reinstein, who died from mesothelioma in 2006. Industry is resistant to this legislation and wants numerous limitations and exceptions to a total ban. 

If You or a Loved One Is Injured by Asbestos, Compensation May Be Available.

Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, helps asbestos victims protect their right to compensation for their harm. If you have an asbestos-related disease or a family member died of one, call us at (855) 385-9532 to learn about your legal rights and how we can help.

Mesothelioma Cases at Square D in Lexington, KY (Podcast)

People who worked at Square D came into contact with molding compound dust containing asbestos. Asbestos causes mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. In this podcast, Paul Kelley talks with John Maher about what former Square D employees and their family members should do if they’ve been affected.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelly. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky Personal Injury Law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today, we’re talking about mesothelioma cases at Square D in Lexington, Kentucky. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Good morning, John. How are you doing?

What is Square D?

John: Good, thanks. Paul, tell me a little bit more about Square D and what it is that they do.

Paul: So, Square D has historically been a company that manufactures a variety of electrical parts. You’re probably familiar with circuit breakers and starters and motors and things that go into an electrical panel box, or go into a big transformer. And, they had a plant in Lexington, Kentucky for many years.

It’s closed down, is my understanding now. But, for many years, Square D had a plant and they made electrical parts for things that go into your homes, for things that go into commercial properties and industrial properties and things of that nature.

Asbestos at Square D in Lexington, KY

John: Okay. And how is Square D related to asbestos and mesothelioma cancer cases?

Paul: So, Square D, the plant here in Lexington, Kentucky, it made a lot of these plastic parts that go into electrical panel boxes and transformers, and they made all those plastic parts right there in the plant. And those plastic parts were made from asbestos products.

And so, there was something called phenolic molding compounds, sometimes called phenolic resins, and it was a powdery or pellet material that usually came in drums or bags. And, they had a room in there that molded these parts. And so, what they would do is they had hoppers, and the hoppers are where the powder was fed into the machine and, using pressure and heat, the molding presses can press these parts into a plastic piece. And, frequently, the plastic piece is just what we call a pre-mold. And then the pre-mold is sent somewhere else and it makes the finished product.

And so, what was occurring in the Square D facility is this mold room, there were many molding machines. And, there were many operators and there were many people that were involved in this process. And so, the hoppers are just big open mixing bowls. So, imagine if you’ve got a kitchen mixer and it’s open and you take a bag of flour and you dump it into the mixer.

Well, that’s essentially what happened there, is these molding compounds were poured into these mixers. And, when that happened, I mean, dust went everywhere. It was impossible to contain the dust. Again, similar to the flour analogy. I mean, if you dump that bag of flour into that mixing bowl, you’re going to get a poof of flour in your face.

John: Sure. It gets right up in your face. Yeah.

Asbestos Dust From Molding Compounds

Paul: That’s right. And so, that’s exactly what happened with these molding compounds when they were put into these hoppers. And again, you’ve got a dozen or more people that are doing that all day long, every day. And again, they’re ripping bags open. And, this is not a criticism of them, but they’re not being all that careful that everything’s getting into the bowl. Sometimes they’d use forklifts and other equipment to dump these big barrels in.

The barrels are big, 55-gallon cardboard barrels. And it’s the same concept. You just dump them in and all this dust is going everywhere. And it’s going everywhere into the face of the people that are doing the dumping. It’s going into the face of the people that actually run the machines. It goes into the face of the people that are cleaning, and ultimately anybody that walked into the room. And we’ve represented several people that have worked in that plant.

And I think one of the issues that’s been most striking to me is that there was nothing to prevent that dust from leaving the molding operation and proliferating into other areas of the plant.

And so, there might be somebody over in assembly that really doesn’t have anything to do with that part or that operation, but they’re getting dust exposure 100 yards away. There are supervisors and engineers and other crafts that would go into that room and get exposure, even if it was for a brief period of time, but they were frequently doing it. So, a big source of exposure there was the molding compounds. And, over the years we’ve developed evidence demonstrating that the manufacturers of those products manufactured them with asbestos. And there were all kinds of different types of products. And not every one of those products contain asbestos, but the vast majority really did. And people would get a lot of exposure that way. Also, it’s a manufacturing plant, and it was built, I think, in the ’60s early or maybe even the ’50s. I think it was built in the ’50s, John.

Asbestos in the Plant’s Building Materials

And so, back in that timeframe, most every industrial plant was built with asbestos. And so, we’ve heard of other products that have been manufactured that contain asbestos that were in the plant. Thermal insulation that went around pipes and heating ducts and other pieces of equipment, floor tile, ceiling tile. Some of the machines contain asbestos. There would be machines there that contain brakes, that contain asbestos and gaskets and a wide variety of construction products. So, those are the two ways that Square D has been connected to asbestos and mesothelioma cases over the 25 years or so that I’ve been doing this.

When Were Square D Employees Exposed to Asbestos?

John: Right. So, how and when were employees then exposed to asbestos? It sounds like it could have been almost anybody who worked there at the plant.

Paul: Absolutely. So, these products were used, the phenolic molding compounds were used for sure in the ’60s, the mid-’70s timeframe. And, I think they ran that operation two, three shifts. I’m pretty sure it was a 24-hour plant, and they ran molding all three shifts.

And so, certainly the people that were directly associated with molding the parts, they were heavily exposed. There were folks who were called setup men or setup people, and their job, they didn’t run the machines, but they set everything up and they were frequently the ones that actually dumped it into the mixing bowls. They were exposed frequently.

There were also people that worked on what we call a “finishing” department. And so, when these plastic pieces, when they’re finally molded, they’re not perfect. And so, they still have excess plastic on them that doesn’t need to be there. And it not only doesn’t look good, but it may actually have an impact on whether it fits into the bigger part that they’re putting them in.

So, they actually had a whole finishing department where they either hand-filed the plastic off, or they had something called a wheelabrator, that electrical piece of equipment that would scrape all of the excess plastic off. And so, the people that did that job were heavily exposed when they did that.

You had people that were involved in cleaning. And lots of times it was the operators and the setup people, but you’d also just have other people whose job, they were laborers and their job was to clean. And so, they’d come in with vacuums and air compressors and brooms and dustpans. And you can’t get rid of asbestos with just a regular vacuum cleaner. You can’t get rid of asbestos with a broom.

How Asbestos Dust Spreads and Increases Exposure

John: Because you’re sweeping all of that dust up that settled onto, say, the ground and then you’re dumping it into a trash can or something like that. And then, again, you’re getting that poof of dust probably in your face.

Paul: Absolutely. And they’re using compressed air to blow off their machines, to blow off their bodies, because all that dust would get on their clothing. And, obviously, when you’re blowing dust around, you’re not removing it, you’re just recirculating it, so that everybody in the area can get bigger exposure.

These products that were being made there, I mean, they’re sophisticated products and they were designed by engineers and they were part of a bigger product. So, engineers would come in all the time to make sure that the products are being manufactured pursuant to specifications. And engineers are in there when they’re pouring the materials in.

They’re in there handling what are called the pills or the preforms, and those pills and preforms still contain dust. They’re in there when they’re being filed and sanded and drilled and cut. And so, those kinds of employees were getting exposed. You’d get the supervisors who aren’t doing the work hands on. They’re getting exposed.

Then later on, a lot of these products go into an assembly area. And sometimes those products had to be drilled into or cut into, and they’re getting exposed from drilling into it. Imagine drilling into a piece of wood if you’ve ever done that, or seen it done. I mean, some of the wood particles are going to come into your face.

The same issue is true with these plastic products. If you’re drilling into it, if you’re sawing into it with a bandsaw or something like that, you’re going to get some dust exposure. We have seen people whose spouses or children ultimately developed mesothelioma from washing or having contact with the employee’s clothing.

So, it gets on their clothes from working there all day, and then they take it home to their wife or husband or children and they get exposed. And then it comes into your house. And, again, once it’s in your home, particularly when you’re bringing it home every day, then you can never get rid of it. It’s in your house and there’s no Hoover vacuum that can remove asbestos dust.

And so, it’s one of those situations where you certainly have your people that are heaviest exposed, the people that work in there and handle the products, but most everybody in the plant who worked there for any long period of time received substantial exposure on a frequent basis.

What If You Have Mesothelioma Due to Asbestos Exposure

John: Yeah. So, if you were exposed to asbestos and at Square D, and now you have lung cancer or asbestosis or mesothelioma, what should you do now?

Paul: Definitely after you get your medical situation worked out as best as possible, because mesothelioma in particular, and certainly lung cancer, are frequently fatal. And, taking medical action and being as aggressive as your doctors have recommended is certainly the biggest task facing anybody. But certainly, what I’ve come to know from our years of experience of handling asbestos cases, is there is a slew of defendants that are responsible for causing your exposure.

And consulting with an attorney who can protect your interest and develop a course of action that’s appropriate for you, I think should be task number two. Task number one, deal with your medical, and devise a plan to deal with that. But task number two is to work towards holding those accountable for what caused your cancer. And we’ve had the fortune over the years to represent a lot of good, hardworking folks that have worked at that plant and have developed cancer, or their loved ones worked at the plant and developed cancer, and certainly know what to do the second that such a case comes in.

So, identifying someone that has experience with mesothelioma cases, identifying someone that has experience with this particular plant, I think, is certainly critical to what you want to do moving forward. And then, certainly retaining somebody that you feel comfortable with, that you feel like is going to do the best job possible protecting your interest, I think is certainly key. And identifying anybody and everybody that might be able to help prove your case. And these plants, this plant I think had hundreds if not thousands of employees during its peak. And there’s a lot of people that worked with you that are still around and probably suffered the same types of exposures and are more than happy to provide information that maybe you don’t have.

Time is always of the essence, and I think it’s important to move quickly, as quickly as you possibly can. Once you retain your lawyer, if it’s somebody that’s dealt with this plant before, or certainly dealt with mesothelioma claims, they should be able to hit the ground running and take action immediately, and let you focus on the things that you need to focus on, which is getting and staying as healthy as you possibly can. You hire me, I worry about your case, you worry about your health.

Statute of Limitations on Mesothelioma Claims

John: Right. And, speaking of moving quickly, is there a statute of limitations on filing a claim against a Square D in Lexington, Kentucky?

Paul: Unfortunately, there is. And, in Kentucky it’s not terribly long. We only have a year from, basically, when you know, or should know, you have an injury and know, or should know, the cause of that injury.

So, theoretically, that can be longer than a year after you were diagnosed, but I personally don’t like taking that risk. So, we always want to file a case certainly within a year of the date of diagnosis. And obviously you want to comply with the law and not run the risk of having your case thrown out. But also, given the unfortunate prognosis for people with mesothelioma, you really want to move as quickly as you possibly can, because we don’t know if people are going to survive for the length of the case.

So, the quicker you get it filed, the quicker that you have a chance of recovering while you’re alive. You get to participate more in your case. But you absolutely have to get it filed within a year. And, if you don’t, the impact is devastating. Our courts have absolutely zero discretion. If you file it a day after the statute, they can’t say, “I’m sorry. Mr. Smith just made a harmless error. We’re going to let you pursue your case.” They can’t do it, and you’re out. So, talk to a lawyer immediately and that lawyer will get that case filed for you, probably immediately.

Can Families Bring Claims Against Square D on Behalf of a Loved One?

John: Is there an opportunity for a family to file a claim against Square D, if their loved one was exposed and then passed away from mesothelioma? And, after that person has passed, can the family bring a claim against Square D?

Paul: Absolutely. Under Kentucky law, not only do you have the right to file on behalf of the claimant, but if the claimant were to die during the case, then the case will still continue on. It’ll just be pursued by the executor of the estate, or the personal representative of the estate. And, under those circumstances, the estate has one year, essentially, after the person died, to revive the case.

And they have a year from the date the personal representative was appointed to file a brand new case. And so, just because the victim passes away doesn’t mean that these companies get off the hook and don’t have to answer for their conduct. They still have to do that. It just might be a little bit more challenging, depending on what witnesses are available and that sort of thing. But the families always have recourse.

John: And, you don’t have the benefit of being able to interview that person once they’re gone.

Paul: Absolutely. Yeah.

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John.

Contact Satterley & Kelley to Learn More

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at satterleylaw.com, or call (855) 385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

Mesothelioma Cases at Ford Motor Company in Louisville, KY (Podcast)

In this podcast, Paul Kelley explains how Ford Motor Company employees were exposed to asbestos at the plant. Then, he outlines what you should do if you or a loved one contracted mesothelioma, lung cancer, or asbestosis due to exposure.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley and Kelley, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today we’re talking about mesothelioma cases at Ford Motor Company in Louisville, Kentucky. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey, John. How are you doing today?

Ford Motor Company in Louisville, KY

John: Good, thanks. Paul, tell me a little bit more about Ford Motor Company’s presence in Louisville, Kentucky. Obviously we know about Ford, but tell me a little bit more about their particular location in Kentucky.

Paul: So John, Ford has a fairly significant presence in Louisville in particular, which is where I’m in, Louisville, Kentucky. There’s two plants here.

One was the Fern Valley Road plant, which is called Louisville Assembly Plant. It has made a variety of passenger vehicles since the 1950s. I think it opened in 1954, 1955, somewhere thereabouts. And then in 1969, ’70, the Kentucky truck plant was built, and that’s actually two-three miles away from where I’m sitting right now.

It has built a variety of trucks from heavy duty, over the road, tractor trailer vehicles to your Ford F-150s, Explorer’s, Ford Escapes, SUVs and those sort of things. It’s a company that’s been around in this area for 60 or 70 years, and it’s employed quite a few people and a lot of contractors and other crafts have gone through both of those facilities a number of times over the years.

Asbestos Exposure at Ford Motor Company

John: Okay. How is the Ford Motor Company related to asbestos and mesothelioma cancer cases?

Paul: A couple of different ways. Here in Louisville, those plants, a lot of people have been afflicted with mesothelioma from building the plant. Back in the 1950s when the LAP was built and the late 1960s and early seventies when KTP was built, they were built with asbestos products.

These asbestos products would include thermal insulation and ovens and furnaces that contain fire, brick and refractory material, gaskets, packing, spray on insulation, tile, floor tile and ceiling tile, and a wide variety of construction products that were utilized to build these plants. Outside contractors that came in and built, we started seeing many years down the road that they were getting cancer and specifically they were getting mesothelioma.

We also see companies that were involved in renovation. Those plants, every so often, they would switch out what they’re making there and go from one model car to another model car. They do what’s called a retrofit and as a part of the retrofit, you have to tear everything out and you have to start, not all of it over, but a lot of it you have to start over.

That means tearing out pipe insulation, and pipe insulation historically contain lots of asbestos fibers. There’s always a paint line and the paint lines had ovens and the ovens were lined with asbestos, and frequently they couldn’t use the same oven, or maybe they took advantage of the opportunity to refurbish that particular oven. They have to take all that out.

Millwrights, electricians, pipe fitters, carpenters, folks like that were fairly routinely in that plant or both of those plants every so often to renovate, tear out, install new. We started seeing a lot of those kinds of people who were diagnosed with cancer and a known exposure was at that plant.

Then, there’s a third category of people, the people that actually work there on the assembly line. For many years, brakes on vehicles, whether it was a passenger car, a passenger truck, or a heavy duty truck, they contained asbestos brake linings. We’ve seen a handful of people who worked on the brake linings at both of those plants and they sand and they grind and they just handle these asbestos brake components.

We started seeing a lot of those kinds of people who developed cancer years down the road and they were lifetime Ford employees. I’d say over the years, I’ve probably represented anywhere from 15 to 20 people that, at least for some portion of their life, worked at one of those two plants in some capacity. It’s quite certain that there was an exposure there. It was a frequent exposure and it was a devastating exposure.

Types of Employees Exposed to Asbestos

John: Who were the people that were typically exposed? You mentioned the people who built the plant, the people who were involved in doing those renovations, and then people who were brake handlers or worked with the brakes. Were there other people who might’ve been exposed as well?

Paul: Yeah, I think anybody that worked in the plant was, from the maintenance people… they have a lot to do. If a pipe burst and there’s not a pipe fitter there, then the maintenance people would take care of that. They have to remove the insulation. Millwrights did a variety of things from working on the conveyor systems. Sometimes they did some of the heavy duty tear out.

Ford frequently contracted with outside millwrights to do that. Sometimes they had in-house millwrights. Electricians, a lot of electricians that worked there and a lot of the electrical parts contain some asbestos parts. Wiring cable, for many years, contained asbestos. So, we’ve seen a lot of the electricians, the carpenters, the pipe fitters, the plumbers, but we’ve also seen a lot of what we call the white collar workers. They had offices there. We’ve seen people that worked in the offices that would walk through the plant and get exposed.

Of course, the superintendents, the people that were supposed to be in the main part of the plant, but they didn’t do the hands-on work, but they’re right there when the other crafts are doing it. We’ve seen people like that get this cancer.

The problem with asbestos exposure is, particularly with mesothelioma, nobody really knows how much it takes to develop the cancer. We know that it’s a dose response system or disease process. The more exposure you get, the more likely that you’re going to get it.

But nobody knows whether it’s a day, a week, a month and reported studies have shown that relatively low dose infrequent exposures have been sufficient to cause this disease. I don’t want to be flippant or cavalier, but a lot of people that just came through the plant for a variety of different reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of these processes we’ve discussed, have developed this terrible cancer. The only exposure that we could ever relate for any of these people was specifically the period of time that they worked at one of these two plants.

What to Do If You Have Mesothelioma Due to Asbestos Exposure at Ford Motor Company

John: Okay, so if you were an employee at Ford in Louisville, Kentucky, and you have lung cancer now, or asbestosis or mesothelioma, what should you do?

Paul: Well, we’ve talked about this in a prior podcast. The biggest problem with this cancer, mesothelioma in particular, and even lung cancer to a certain degree, mesothelioma is nearly always fatal. Most people are going to die within six to 18 months of diagnosis and it’s tough.

Certainly, getting one’s medical situation as under control as possible, I think is certainly the first and foremost responsibility and task that they should undertake. But once that occurs, they really should seek representation of counsel. There is a lot of burden that people are going to take on with this cancer and they’re going to have to stop working at some point, they’re going to incur hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars in medical expenses.

Some of that they’re going to be responsible for themselves. Unfortunately, many of our clients and people that are afflicted with this disease will experience indescribable pain and suffering. There are ways to help with all of that. You can’t do it on your own.

I wish that it was true that you could, but to hire counsel who has had experience, not just with asbestos cases, not just with mesothelioma cases, but with these particular locations, I think is key to having a successful outcome. The biggest issue is we’re talking about exposures that occurred in some instances 60 or 70 years ago. In many instances, more like 30 or 40. But who remembers everything that happened 30 and 40 years ago? I mean, hardly anybody does. It takes a little bit of time to reconstruct your work history and to figure out all the possible ways that you were exposed.

Unfortunately, time is of the essence. It’s of the essence for a few different reasons. But one of the biggest ones is if you’re the claimant, if you’re the person that has the cancer, your medical situation may take a downward turn abruptly. To be able to hit the ground running and file your claim and try to identify all the parties that are responsible for causing your cancer is key.

Without the claimant, without the person who’s actually suffered from the disease, it may be very difficult to reconstruct what occurred. So, it’s always important to act quickly. We’re prepared to act quickly because we’ve dealt with both of these plants and we know what to do. Finding somebody that knows what to do and doesn’t have to spend a bunch of time researching and trying to figure it out is going to more than likely increase your chances of a good outcome.

Finding somebody you’re comfortable with and somebody that you feel like is ready to fight for you and battle for you, that’s certainly very important as well. I also recommend that trying to identify anybody and everybody that you work with, there were many people that worked at these plants, still do, and you may not know the things they know. They may not know the things you know.

So, it’s good to put everybody’s collective minds together and try to figure everything out and timelines and products and that sort of thing. The number one mission after you figure out what your medical plan’s going to be is to be proactive. Don’t wait to take action. Don’t wait for things to happen. Make them happen and the best way that you can make them happen is to hire somebody that has experience and knows what they’re doing.

Statute of Limitations on Filing Claims Against Ford

John: Yeah, and speaking of waiting, is there a statute of limitations on filing a claim against Ford Motor Company in Louisville?

Paul: Absolutely, and that’s another reason to move quickly. Kentucky has a fairly harsh statute of limitations. We only have a year from the date that we know we’re injured or should know we’re injured and also know or should know what caused our injury.

But the number one rule of thumb is a year from the date of diagnosis. I don’t like leaving it in the hands of a court or a jury to decide when anybody knew or should have known anything. If somebody’s been diagnosed with mesothelioma, and today’s August 4th, 2023, I would say that that lawsuit better be filed within a year from today, or you’re not going to have an opportunity to recover, and it’s harsh. Courts have no discretion.

If you blow your statute of limitations by one hour, you’re done, and our courts can’t do anything at all to help you even if they want to. That statute of limitations doesn’t just apply to Ford. In many instances, claimants won’t be able to sue Ford if Ford was their direct employer, but we know all the manufacturers, we know the distributors, suppliers, and that statute of limitations applies across the board.

To the extent that a worker’s compensation claim could be filed against Ford, you’d actually have another couple of years beyond that to file that kind of case. But what we’re talking about, what we do and what would really help a victim and his or her family do, is to file a lawsuit against those responsible, and that better be filed within a year or you’re really looking at a difficult time to recover for your injuries.

Filing Suit in the State Where the Exposure Occurred

John: Right, and that would be the case, even though Ford Motor Company is like a nationwide company? I don’t know where their national headquarters is, but you couldn’t get around that by filing a claim against Ford at whatever state that their headquarters is in or something like that?

Paul: More than likely not. Ford’s located in Michigan, and I’ll be honest, I don’t know what Michigan’s statute of limitations is, but most states will take the statute of limitations from the state where the exposure occurred.

John: Okay.

Paul: If the exposure occurred in Kentucky, even if a lawsuit was filed in Michigan and a lawsuit could be filed against Ford in Michigan, but the Michigan Court would still take the Kentucky statute of limitations. More than likely, I hate to speak in “exactitude” because you never know, but I would never feel comfortable in assuming that another state will apply their longer statute of limitations when I know what we would do in Kentucky.

In Kentucky, we would take the statute of limitations from the exposure state. Of course, in some instances that’s longer than what we deal with, but don’t think you’re going to get around it by trying to file someplace else. You might get away with it, but more than likely you’re not. If that’s a gamble you take and it doesn’t work out, you’ve cost yourself potentially millions of dollars in recovery.

Contact Satterley & Kelley for Help

John: All right, well that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks, John, I appreciate it.

John: For more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley and Kelley at satterleylaw.com or call (855) 385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

Mesothelioma Cases at AT&T in Louisville, KY (Podcast)

In this podcast, Paul Kelley talks with John Maher about asbestos at AT&T in Louisville, KY. He explains how employees, contractors, and customers may have been exposed to asbestos. Then, he outlines how to file a lawsuit if you contracted mesothelioma or lung cancer due to exposure.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm Satterley & Kelley, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today, we’re talking about mesothelioma cases at AT&T in Louisville, Kentucky. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Good morning, John. How are you doing?

AT&T in Louisville, Kentucky

John: Good, thanks. I think most people have heard of AT&T phone company, but tell me a little bit more about at AT&T’s presence in Louisville, Kentucky.

Paul: Well, AT&T’s presence is everywhere. They’re our phone company, and they have had an interesting history over the years. For those of us that are old enough, and I think you and I both qualify there, John, there was the original Ma Bell.

Brief History of AT&T

Of course, it broke up in the early 1980s because it was a huge monopoly. I mean, I think AT&T at one point probably employed over a million people nationwide. It provided long distance telephone service coast to coast. In the 1980s, the federal government made it break up and it broke up into what are called the Baby Bells.

We won’t get too far into the weeds, but what ultimately happened is when AT&T busted up, there were all these other regional Bell companies that opened up. Here in Kentucky, it was South Central Bell, and further south I think it was Southeastern Bell, and out West it was Pacific Bell, and in Texas area, Southwestern Bell. All these Baby Bells crept up, and eventually the Baby Bells got huge.

What ultimately happened is one of the Baby Bells got so big that it bought the old original AT&T, and the old AT&T became the subsidiary of…I think it was Southwestern Bell. And then Southwestern Bell renamed themselves to AT&T.

It’s been a fascinating journey in that regard. But what AT&T did back in the day before it was busted up is it controlled every facet of the telephone service. It had other subsidiaries. It had a subsidiary called Bell Laboratories, and Bell Laboratories was the research arm of the company.

It was also the safety arm of the overall company. It had Western Electric, which was the manufacturing and installation service of the company. A lot of people don’t know this. We all run around with our cell phones today and a few people have landlines.

But back in the day when you got a telephone, you didn’t go to the store to buy it. It came from the phone company. You couldn’t go to whatever the store was. Here in Kentucky, Targets are big. You didn’t go to Target and buy a phone. You had to get it from the telephone company. Western Electric made those phones. Western Electric made those phones basically at the behest of AT&T, and Western Electric charged AT&T a big premium for those phones. And then AT&T charged you through your services to cover the cost of those phones.

Asbestos Fireproofing at AT&T in Louisville, KY

And that’s one of the reasons why they broke up is because there was no competitor and they were able to charge you essentially whatever they wanted to charge you. That was the history and what was interesting of how we got to where we are today. But to answer your question more directly as how it’s related to asbestos, well, really a couple ways. Every major hub city has what’s called a central office, and the central office is essentially what controls your phone service. Here in Louisville, we have a nine-story building and it’s downtown.

It’s been in existence forever, 1950s, and it’s occupied both by AT&T, or historically it was occupied by AT&T, and then it was also occupied by South Central Bell, which was the local phone company. AT&T controlled your long distance service and South Central Bell controlled your local and AT&T was your long distance. I misspoke. They had floors also there that were dedicated to just equipment, just the equipment that operated all the phones. There’s all these wires and cables that are running through the building.

And what a phenomenal fire hazard that is. Because in order to run wiring cable from floor to floor and from room to room, you have to drill holes or put holes in the walls. When you put holes in the walls, it creates the prospect of massive airflow, and the prospect of massive airflow can mean a fire results in the entire place engulfed in flames. And not only is a building destroyed and, God help us, a lot of people could get injured or killed, but we lose our phone service.

It was very important to AT&T at all of these central offices throughout the United States, including Louisville, to make sure that if there was a fire that busted out, that it would only impact the location of where that fire occurred, and hopefully they could prevent it from expanding to other floors and devastating the whole operation. In order to do that, they would cover the holes in the floors with something called transite. The transite is historically an asbestos containing product, and it’s basically a piece of cement that has asbestos fibers in it.

Everybody’s seen cement before, so you know what that looks like. Well, this one has asbestos in it, and the reason it does is because asbestos was very heat-resistant. It could prevent the degradation of the product so that they wouldn’t have to constantly replace this piece of transite. Well, it’s hard to explain, but if you’ve got a communication cable and you need to run it from floor eight to floor nine, you’re drilling a hole in floor nine and a hole in the ceiling of floor eight. You have to keep that completely and entirely airtight.

But you’re not just putting one piece of cable in at a time, they might put in 10 at a time. But that piece of that area, that specific area, might be able to hold 25, 30 cables. You put the first 10 in, but you’re going to expand that particular opening at some point in time to maybe 30. In order to fit 30 cables in, that hole has to be bigger. The people who installed those cables, they were constantly cutting into this transite material. They would take a band saw or some circular saw and they would cut into it.

It had to be precision. There couldn’t be any gaps whatsoever. It had to be completely and entirely airtight. Essentially they had to jam those cables in there to make sure that no airflow could come through at all. Folks that did the installation work were heavily exposed when they were cutting into the transite boards. There are dozens, if not hundreds of these boards that were all over these central offices, probably dozens per floor. You’re cutting the transite on the floor.

Using Raw Asbestos to Fill Cable Holes

Now, there’s always going to be a gap between the ceiling and the floor. That’s another opportunity for airflow to come through. One of the things that AT&T did, and they did it way back in the ’50s and ’60s when they started operating these central offices, is they had bags of raw asbestos that they stuffed into these holes. It contained chrysotile asbestos, is I think what we have determined. It was in a flour sack material, so the bags didn’t really do anything to contain what was in them.

They would stuff 20, 30 bags into a hole. Every day that an installer had to work on that particular opening, they had to take the bags out at the beginning of the shift. They had to do whatever cutting was associated with the transite. And then, at the end of the day, they had to put the transite boards back down. They had to put all of those bags back into the holes and make sure that that entire area is sealed as completely as possible to prevent the airflow. We’ve represented people who did those jobs.

Between the transite drilling and that exposure, they got a lot of dust, and then those bags just did nothing to contain the dust. They got a tremendous amount of dust exposure from doing that. Over the years we’ve seen air sampling studies that were taken by these entities. I don’t want to single out AT&T, but you had AT&T, Western Electric, and Bell Laboratories that were all collaborating together on all of this.

AT&T’s Awareness of Asbestos Risk

In the mid 1970s, they took some air sampling when somebody drilled into those transite boards, and the results were so bad that they said, “We’ve got to get rid of these. We can’t do this anymore.” The good news is that they recognized the hazard and they developed a plan to get them out of there. The bad news is they didn’t take them out all at once. They waited until there was a need to completely replace that board. At that point, they put steel in, and with steel, there are certainly other hazards that may be associated with cutting steel, but not asbestos.

But in 1974 or 1975, they made this determination that this is not a good thing and we have to get this out. But they still had those boards in the 1980s and people were still being exposed to them. It’s the same thing with the bags. They recognized the bags are a hazard. They claimed that there really weren’t that many bags that were at all these offices, but that seems to be contrary to the evidence that we’ve developed over the course of time. Here in Louisville, the central office had hundreds of boards, hundreds of bags.

The people who installed them, which were typically Western Electric employees, got a lot of exposure from doing that. And then the AT&T and the South Central Bell employees, once Western Electric did its job as the installer, once it did that, then the South Central Bell and AT&T employees took over the maintenance work. There may be situations where they had to cut and saw and have exposure to some of these bags and that sort of thing. There are some other things as well that I think are worth mentioning, the telephones that we talked about.

Asbestos in Old Plastic Phones

You know what I’m talking about, the old rotary phones that kids today would go crazy with. That’s all you had. They were made of plastic, and there were lots of electrical components that were in those plastic phones. Western Electric made those phones and they made them with asbestos. We didn’t have a facility in Kentucky where they made those phones, but there are facilities throughout the United States where Western Electric made those from molded plastic parts called phenolic molding compounds.

They were exposed to dust from these compounds that were used to make the phones. Eventually, by the time you and I were teenagers, you could walk into a store and buy phones. That was one of the byproducts of the phone breakup, that we weren’t stuck with buying AT&T phones anymore. And that practice largely changed. Then of course they, generally speaking, used other materials to make them.

Asbestos in Building Materials

One other way that we see, or a couple other ways that we see exposures, the floors at these central offices were made from asbestos vinyl tile. They had to drill into the floors as well, so you drill into the transite, but you also have to drill into the floors. The installers would get exposure from drilling into the floors. People that worked out in the field that connected, basically, the lines that went from the building into the poles. Obviously this is sophisticated process, and I’m making it as simple as possible, but I’m sure that people are familiar with the term “conduit”, and conduit is usually a pipe of some sort where all the lines are contained.

Because when you put something underground, you don’t want to have mud and branches and all kinds of things that are growing down, so they protect them in a pipe. For many years, those pipes were made from the same transite materials that the covers were in the central offices. Installers or people that had to maintain those lines would have to use saws to tap into those pipes, and they would get an exposure to asbestos from doing that.

I guess I can’t say this with absolute confidence, but I would venture a guess and say that some of those pipes are still around today and some of our poor telephone workers may still have some exposure to them. But AT&T and all of its related entities, they’ve been heavily involved in asbestos for many years.

They were a part of all the big organizations back in the ’60s and ’70s when asbestos became a bigger topic, National Safety Council and Industrial Hygiene Foundation and all these organizations that learned a lot about asbestos, but then didn’t take all the appropriate steps to protect all their various workers. It’s really fascinating the first time I got involved in one of those cases, really marveled at how AT&T controlled everything for so long.

But ultimately that control was not just a bad thing for consumers like you and me, but it was very bad for the people that had to put all of this in place and had to be exposed to terrible things without really the slightest bit of protection.

What Should You Do If You Were Exposed?

John: Right. If you were one of these employees who might’ve been exposed to asbestos, especially these Western Electric installers or the various people that did work in these plants, and now you have lung cancer or asbestosis or mesothelioma, what should you do next?

Paul: Well, time is of the essence. Unfortunately, this cancer, mesothelioma in particular, is a devastating cancer. Right now, the best statistics are that people pass away from it within six to 18 months of diagnosis.

Lung cancer has a much better survival rate, but depending on when it’s caught. People certainly pass away from that. And regardless, they both have terrible treatments that are just time-consuming, expensive, intrusive, and frequently cause a lot of pain and suffering as well.

I always tell people in the abstract before they’ve been diagnosed with this disease that it’s always important to reach out to a lawyer to find out what your rights are. It’s critical, of course, that you get your medical situation in the best control that you can.

Here in Kentucky, we have great doctors that treat this cancer and there are great physicians across the country who perform surgeries and have unique experience. Treating mesothelioma, your chances of survival are so much better, your quality of life is so much better if it’s caught early and the doctors can be aggressive.

Certainly, do everything that you can do to research and determine all of your medical options. Is surgery good for you? Is chemotherapy, radiation? What’s best for you? But unfortunately, while you’re dealing with that, if you’re interested in holding those accountable for what’s happening to you, then you need to contact an attorney immediately. It’s tough because I don’t think that I would’ve guessed the kinds of exposures that we’re talking about here until I got heavily involved in handling these kinds of cases.

I think a lot of lawyers would say, “Oh, well, you worked at the phone company. I mean, what are you doing? You’re putting lines in. There’s probably not an exposure there.” It’s critical to identify an attorney who has handled these kinds of cases, knows who the stable of defendants are, knows what the evidence is, and knows what to do with it. I would encourage folks to really do their research and try to find somebody that meets all of that criteria. Of course, finding somebody that you have a good rapport with, that you feel comfortable with.

I mean, most of my cases last two, three years and, heaven forbid, some last even longer, and you’re going to spend a lot of time with that person. Somebody that you feel like is good for you, that is going to fight for you and be friends with you I think is certainly critical. Not wasting time, John. I mean, that’s really the biggest issue, and I hate it for people.

I hate that they have this medically devastating issue they’re dealing with on one side, but the legal world doesn’t stop for you. Any time wasted has a potentially devastating impact on your ability to hold those accountable for causing you or your loved one this deadly cancer.

Statute of Limitations on Filing Claims Against AT&T

John: Speaking of time constraints, is there a statute of limitations on filing a claim against AT&T in Louisville?

Paul: Yeah, that’s a good question. We have a one-year statute of limitations. What that really means is you have a year from the date that you know or should know what your injury is and know or should know what caused that injury.

Typically, that’s easy to figure out. Sometimes it’s not so easy, but what I generally tell people is a year from when you’ve been diagnosed. You don’t want to run the risk of a court determining that you should have known earlier than what you did. Of course, if you hired me, we’re not getting anywhere near that year, unless you came to me late.

But if you came to me a couple weeks or a couple months from diagnosis, we’re filing quickly. It’s very harsh. Our courts don’t have any discretion. If they don’t think that you’ve filed it timely, they can’t help you out even if they want to. Time is of the essence. You want to do everything you can do to preserve evidence. You want to do everything you can do to collect evidence. Hiring the right attorney will help you do that and really point you in the right direction of what you need to do.

And then as I tell everybody, when you hire me or my law firm, once we get the initial information that we need, this is our issue at this point. We worry about the case. We do the things that need to be done in order to be successful for you. You have a very important task, and that’s to be with your family, to continue to fight this cancer and pursue all of the medical treatment and remedies that you can find. Once you get that lawyer part out of the way, then you can get back to focusing on what’s really important, which is your health and spending time with your family.

Contact Satterley & Kelley for Help

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks, John.

John: For more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

What to Do When Your Loved One Gets a Mesothelioma Diagnosis

Getting a mesothelioma diagnosis is often completely overwhelming for patients and their loved ones. After the initial shock, there is often a whirlwind of emotions, from frustration and anger to fear and anxiety, and it can be difficult to process those emotions while also trying to process so much new information about the road ahead.  

If your loved one is diagnosed with mesothelioma, you may not know what to do next, or how to best show your support and strength for them. However, you should know that loved ones of mesothelioma patients are uniquely capable of providing empathy and understanding as well as practical assistance in the wake of a mesothelioma diagnosis. While it is often difficult to know where to start, we can offer some crucial tips on how to best show up for your loved one in their time of need.

While every mesothelioma journey is different, and each person will need their loved one to show up in different ways, loved ones might consider the following:

  • Gather information. After a mesothelioma diagnosis, patients are often flooded with information and asked to make very important decisions. In many cases, patients are still in shock and attempting to handle the emotional weight of what they have been told and may find it difficult to process this information fully. Loved ones can offer essential support in paying careful attention to the diagnostic care team. As your loved one’s eyes and ears, you may want to record whatever is said by writing it down, asking for a print-out, or simply recording the appointment with your phone. Knowledge is power and can help your loved one tremendously.
  • Help with research and exploring treatment options.  Simply put, mesothelioma comes with a lot of homework. Patients often have to learn about the condition, get second opinions, and figure out the best specialists, treatment centers, and treatment methodologies for them. While your mesothelioma care team can help you with this process, it is often wise to have as much research and information under your belt as possible. Many mesothelioma patients find this part of the process too overwhelming or anxiety-inducing, so loved ones can fill the crucial role of researcher on their behalf.
  • Come to medical appointments and serve as a medical advocate. In addition to a lot of homework, a mesothelioma diagnosis comes with a lot of medical appointments. As your loved one embarks on their mesothelioma treatment journey, one of the best ways to support them is by being physically present with them for these appointments. Many mesothelioma patients feel lonely, vulnerable, or just plain bored going to their many doctors’ appointments on their own. Being present for these appointments will also help you advocate for your loved one and stay informed about their care.
  • Listen, encourage, communicate, and support emotional needs. One of the most essential and often overlooked things that loved ones can do for mesothelioma patients comes down to empathetic communication. Make space to actively listen to your loved one, and to really hear what they say to you. Make sure to check in with them regularly and to be truly available for them. Ask them about their fears, concerns, and any other emotions they might be feeling, and let them know that you are here for them. Create an environment where they feel safe expressing themselves and letting you know about what they are experiencing physically and emotionally, as well as what they might need.
  • Create a wider emotional support network: Having a rare cancer like mesothelioma can be very isolating for patients, and while loved ones can provide a great deal of essential support, most mesothelioma patients need a wider, more comprehensive network to get the support they need. Loved ones can help create or reinforce that network, both by facilitating regular visits with friends and family members, and by connecting with communities of people who know what the patient is going through. Mesothelioma support groups—whether online, in-person, or both—can provide essential support, as well as insights and a sense of community, camaraderie, and shared struggle that mesothelioma patients might otherwise lack.
  • Maintain privacy and dignity: Many mesothelioma patients are taken out of their comfort zones during treatment, feeling exposed and vulnerable as their private information is discussed frequently by many people they may or may not know. Loved ones can be an essential bolster against the loss of privacy that mesothelioma patients experience. Whenever possible, do not discuss a mesothelioma patient’s medical condition, symptoms, treatment, or prognosis with others without their permission. This will help retain their sense of boundaries, privacy, and dignity, which drastically improves quality of life.
  • Help with daily tasks and logistical/practical treatment matters. As mentioned above, mesothelioma comes with a lot of homework, and a lot of logistical puzzles to solve. You can help your loved one tremendously by handling those logistical and practical matters, which can range from figuring out the cost of treatment financially, to pursuing legal recourse for asbestos exposure, to figuring out how to get the patient to and from appointments, or any number of other practical matters that need to be handled for mesothelioma patients. In addition, remember that the physical needs and abilities of mesothelioma patients have often changed significantly since diagnosis, and they may not know how much help they need—and in some cases, may feel embarrassed to ask. Be proactive in helping your loved one with daily tasks like cooking and cleaning in addition to larger logistical problem-solving.
  • Create a healthy, supportive, and encouraging environment for treatment. Another essential element of success for mesothelioma patients is having a healthy, supportive, and encouraging environment during treatment. Whether this environment is at home or at an inpatient facility, mesothelioma patients need an environment conducive to healing, and loved ones can be essential in creating that environment. Make sure your loved one has a clean, healthy living space that is accessible to them, and that they eat a nutritious diet, comply with their medication regimen, and exercise as much as is recommended. In addition to a healthy physical environment, loved ones are essential in maintaining a positive, hopeful, and encouraging emotional environment for mesothelioma patients, which is one of the most central forms of support they can provide.
  • Listen to what your loved one wants and honor their wishes: Mesothelioma comes with a number of very serious decisions, and those decisions belong first and foremost to the mesothelioma patient themselves. At the end of the day, the best way for a loved one to support a mesothelioma patient is to respect that these decisions are complex and personal, and to honor whatever the patient chooses. In some cases, loved ones do not agree with the choices made by mesothelioma patients, especially those who choose not to pursue aggressive treatment. However, as a loved one, you can best show your care, dedication, and support by allowing mesothelioma patients to retain their agency and make their own choices.

Are you or a loved one looking for more information about mesothelioma? Call (855) 385-9532 to learn more.