Can You Take Legal Action if Your Child is Injured?

If your child is injured because of another party’s negligence or intentional act, you may be able to pursue an insurance claim or lawsuit for compensation for that injury. There are some unique requirements for these legal actions, but overall, the issues and laws involving these cases are the same as if an adult is injured.

What Types of Injuries Could Be Covered?

Not all injuries, whether to a child or an adult, are worth an insurance claim or lawsuit. They may be minor, or the injured party may be mostly or completely at fault, so the potential recovery is too small to justify the expense and effort needed in these cases.

However, legal action may be worth considering if an injury is severe or fatal and another party played a role in causing it. These types of injuries include those caused by the following:

Vehicle Accidents

If your child is in a vehicle involved in an accident and injured, they can be compensated for the harm they suffer. For vehicle accident cases, a common defense is that one party is at least partially to blame for the crash.

An injured child as a passenger in a car seat or belted in could not have done anything to prevent the accident or their injuries.

The party responsible for the injuries may be the one driving the vehicle your child was in, the driver of another car, or a party that’s responsible for dangerous conditions that led to the accident.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents

A child getting struck by a vehicle as a pedestrian may suffer life-altering injuries. You must teach your child about safety and how to walk and bike on roads. If the accident is the result of your child darting out into the street without looking, you may have a difficult case to prove.

Kentucky law requires those under 12 to use bike helmets. If they suffer head injuries in a bicycle accident and aren’t using one, the driver may not be held responsible, or the damages award may be limited. Even if they’re 12 or older, the fact they’re not using a helmet could be used against them

Crimes

Parents can take legal action if their child was injured (physically or emotionally) due to a crime. The perpetrator and others may be held accountable.

If your child is being supervised by a school, church, or other organization that’s negligent in screening its employees or volunteers or fails to manage them properly, and your child is sexually abused or assaulted, that church, organization, or school may be liable for the harm they cause. If your child is attacked at school by another student, their parents and the school might be responsible

Slip and Fall Accidents

Property owners and those running commercial businesses must keep their premises safe for all those using them to reasonably prevent slip and fall accidents.

If they fail to take proper precautions or actions to repair a dangerous situation and your child falls and is seriously injured, they may be held liable.

Dog Bites

Dog owners are responsible for the injuries their dogs cause. Children are especially vulnerable to serious injuries caused by an aggressive dog.

So if your child is attacked or bit by a dog, you can seek financial damages from the owner.

Drowning Accidents

If your child is with others and is swimming in a pool or lake, if those supervising or hosting them are negligent, they may be liable for the harm they cause.

This also applies to water parks that are paid to provide a safe environment for customers.

Medical Malpractice

Serious medical mistakes can affect a patient for as long as they live.

For a child, that impairment or disability could last for decades and impact their ability to do well at school, earn an income, socialize with others, and their overall quality of life.

Sports Injuries

Some sports, even when correctly played, carry a risk of injury. But that doesn’t mean your child has no rights if they’re injured.

If another player goes well beyond the rules and hurts your child, or referees look the other way when play becomes dangerous, there may be a basis for legal action. Coaches may also be responsible if they put players in danger by having them play when they’re injured, don’t allow them to hydrate, ignore their medical needs, or encourage dangerous and violent play.

Even if you signed a waiver for participation, that shouldn’t prevent you from contacting a lawyer and discussing your options because it may not be enforceable.

Speak To A Personal Injury Attorney Today

If someone else’s negligent or intentional acts injured your child, Satterley & Kelley PLLC attorneys are here to help. We will be with you every step of the way, protecting their best interests and ensuring your child gets the compensation they deserve. You do not have to deal with this alone.

To take advantage of a free initial consultation where you can discuss what happened and your legal rights, call our office in Louisville at 502-589-5600 (toll-free at 855-385-9532). You may also complete our contact form if it’s more convenient.

Mesothelioma at Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, IN (Podcast)

In this podcast, John Maher and Paul Kelley discuss what happened in Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, IN. This plant is known for having many employees, contractors, and others exposed to asbestos, which puts them at serious risk for developing mesothelioma and other related diseases.

John Maher: Hi, I’m John Maher and I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos claims. Today, we’re talking about mesothelioma at the Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, Indiana. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey, John. How’s it going today?

John: I’m well, how are you, Paul?

Paul: Doing fantastic. Thank you.

What is Warrick Power Plant and Where are They Located?

John: Good. So Paul, tell us a little bit about the Warrick Power Plant and what they are, what they do, and where they’re located.

Paul: Sure. So the Warrick Power Plant Powerhouse, it’s located in Newburgh Indiana, and it’s actually for all intents and purposes, it’s next door to the Alcoa plant, which is aluminum producing plant. And actually, Warrick predominantly supported the Alcoa plant. But in addition, Warrick also provides power to other facilities and other customers in the Indiana, that Newburgh Indiana area.

The plant started operation in 1960 ultimately, and we’ll talk a little bit more about powerhouses, but basically a powerhouse has a turbine and a boiler. And the turbine creates the energy and the boiler creates the steam, which goes to the turbine to create the energy. So we’ll refer to it as a unit. So every unit has a turbine and a boiler. So there were four units at the Warrick Powerhouse, and all four units were built between 1960 and 1970. The last one being built in 1970 and went online in 1970.

And so, three of those units are actually owned by Alcoa. And the fourth unit is owned by a company called SIGECO. It’s Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company. And I believe that SIGECO operates all the units. So Alcoa owned three and SIGECO owns one and operates all four of them. And so powerhouses were infamous for having lots of asbestos. And turbines and boilers contain asbestos, and there were lots of different products. And we can talk about that in a minute. But basically from 1960 to 1970, this plant was built, and I believe that it’s still in full and complete operation today.

The Alcoa plant, I think it’s still in operation. Steam turbines and they’re coal operated plants are starting to be phased out. And so this one, if it hasn’t already been, it will be. But for 50 to 60 years, it provided power to both the Alcoa plant as well as to other customers in the Newburg, Indiana area.

Was Asbestos Used at Warrick Power Plant?

John: Yeah, so talk a little bit more about asbestos and where and why that was used in the Warrick Power Plant.

Paul: So asbestos is an excellent heat retention product. Power houses generate an incredible amount of heat. The boilers are thousands of degrees producing heat. The turbines have lots of heat. And so asbestos insulation in particular was a great heat retention product. And so the turbines were insulated with asbestos. They usually had a block insulation material that went over it, and then there would be muds that would use to fix it. There were some periods of time where they used the big asbestos blanket that they wrapped the outer shell of the turbine.

With all the piping containing asbestos, the valves that were connected to the piping were covered with asbestos. These boilers are many stories buildings. Imagine a seven or eight story building. That’s what these boilers are. And the boilers have fire brick and refractory material. Sometimes the outer shells of the turbines, or I’m sorry, parts of the boilers contain asbestos. All the piping that was connected to the boilers contained asbestos. So that’s just the turbine and the boiler. You have miles of pipes that goes throughout a power house.

Most of those pipes carry steam. All the steam lines were covered with asbestos insulation. Some of those pipes contain high temperature chemicals. Those would also be insulated with asbestos. Lots of the pipes were connected with asbestos containing gaskets. You had things like precipitators and smoke stacks and all kinds of different types of equipment that required high temperature that were all insulated with asbestos. You had valves and motors and pumps that were insulated with either packing or some other type of insulating material because of the high temperature associated with motors, for example.

Sometimes they had equipment there that contained breaks. These were industrial type breaks that contained asbestos. Even offices in some of these plants would’ve a ceiling tile and floor tile that contained asbestos. And so much thermal insulation, so many gaskets, so many valves and pumps that were all stuffed with asbestos packing. It was a wide variety of stuff.

Given the time period that this plant was constructed, all four units contained asbestos. All four turbines were originally insulated with asbestos. All four boilers were originally insulated with asbestos. And it was pervasive throughout the facility. And my educated guess is that if you went into that facility today, you’d still see a lot of asbestos that’s there. Hopefully it’s protected, but it’s still there.

What Types of Employees Were Exposed to Asbestos at Warrick Power Plant?

John: Right. So the asbestos was all over the place in this plant. Who were some of the employees or types of employees that might’ve been exposed to that asbestos?

Paul: The short answer is everybody, but the long answer is certainly they’re in the construction phase. It takes a lot of people to build a powerhouse, and they were fairly well building it continuously over that ten year period of time. And so certainly everybody that participated in building it, you’d get a wide variety of crafts that built it. We’ve represented electricians, insulators, and pipe fitters. If I didn’t say millwrights, those type of crafts.

So, the millwrights put in a lot of the equipment. Conveyors. You had coal that was used to heat the boilers and so they would build conveyors. They built scaffolding. They built all kinds of different types of conveyors. They’d set a lot of the equipment and they would be there during the insulation phase. Insulators, I mean, I told you before, all that plant had to be insulated. Some of the insulators were just there constantly insulating pipes and boilers and turbines and equipment. The pipe fitters who installed all those miles of pipes and they were present when all those pipes were insulated.

I mean, electricians have to connect all that equipment together. They have to work on the boilers, they have to work on the turbines. They have to work with asbestos insulated wire and cable. They had to set motors. They had to connect equipment to motors. Of course, the boilermakers. Boilermakers are the ones that built the boilers. They’re the ones that had to get inside the boilers and build the tubes. And sometimes they were present during the installation of the fire brick and refractory material.

The engineers that participated in designing and building, they had to oversee the project. They were there during the insulation phase. So certainly everybody that was there during construction. Well, when they put unit one up and they started building unit two, the people that are now operating unit one, they’re exposed both to the operation of the equipment in unit one that contain asbestos. And they’re also being exposed to what’s going on in unit two. I mean, these units weren’t super close together, but they were close enough.

So frequently we would hear that people would walk through unit two during the construction phase from time to time, and they were exposed even if they weren’t participating in that. Operating this equipment, a power plant is just a unique place. It’s loud, lots of vibrations in the plant, lots of insulation that deteriorates and falls down on people. Lots of maintenance activities where pipe fitters and other maintenance workers are tearing off insulation and exposing the people below them.

They would overhaul these turbines and boilers every so often, usually four or five, six years, depends on what the needs. And when they do that, they have to completely shut it down. They tear off all the insulation. They rip out all the fire brick in the boilers. They remove all the gaskets and then lots of times tear the packing out. These gaskets, once they are put on the pipes, I mean just absolutely affixed. The best I can describe it is if you stick a piece of gum on something and it sticks there for a long time, it just doesn’t come off in one piece. You’ve got to scrape it off.

And that’s what folks had to do with the gaskets. That’s what they had to do frequently with the packing and these valves. The pipe insulation, I mean it’d just crumble apart right in your breathing zone when it was occurring. We’ve had millwrights that participate in the overhauls. So it’s hard to explain without visual, but a turbine is usually a 50 to 75 foot vessel. And there are pipes above it and below it. And so, lots of times the millwrights would have to go below the turbine floor where there’s all these pipes that are all insulated, and they would actually stand on the pipes while they’re working on the turbine itself.

And all these pipes are insulated, and all the insulation is just pouring off the pipe because it’s deteriorated by this point. And just again, imagine just taking your finger and you could just crush it with your finger. It just comes apart. And then all that dust proliferates and you are in a very enclosed tight space. And so that’s just one example. But if you had somebody who’s highly specialized and educated person who’s running the plant, they’re exposed every day. The people that work in the office who answer the phones to procure products, they’re exposed on a frequent basis. People who deliver products are exposed on a frequent basis. Plant visitors.

I mean, I hear from people all the time who, well, we have a pretty good engineering school at the University of Louisville called the Speed School, and they had a co-op program. And so a lot of these kids, when they were going through their education, they would get sent to power houses. That was their co-op job, learning on the job. And they’re sent to a power house to participate in some aspect of either construction or operation, maintenance, over hall, whatever. And these twenty-year-old kids that don’t know anything are being exposed to asbestos.

So, it’s a very difficult environment and power houses aren’t clean. They are very dusty and dirty places. And because of the high temperature, they had to reinsulate a lot because that insulation would deteriorate within a year or two. And so they were just constantly removing and reinstalling. And yeah, there became a point in time where they replaced with non-asbestos stuff. But it sure did take a long time to get to that point. And we’re talking deep into the seventies, if not eighties before new asbestos came on or new non-asbestos came on. But certainly they didn’t just come through and take all the old off in one shot.

It’s still there today. They take it off as needed and people were frequently exposed. And there just really wasn’t much way to avoid it if you went into that plant and did anything from the time that it was built through probably the late eighties, early nineties.

What Should You Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos at Warrick Power Plant?

John: So, if you were exposed to asbestos or potentially exposed because you worked at the Warrick Power Plant, what should you do next?

Paul: Well, I think it’s important to determine your legal rights. It’s obviously important to determine your legal rights. We have had a number of cases from that plant. There are entities that can be held accountable. Who those entities are going to depend on your personal situation. But I think it’s important to consult with a lawyer immediately and try to figure out whether you have a case and then determine whether the attorneys counsel you on how to pursue that case.

Of course, you’ve got a medical diagnosis that’s difficult. Mesothelioma is a very difficult disease. It’s almost always fatal, and it’s very important that you get your medical plan in place and determine what treatment you’re going to do. From a standpoint of what we do, we don’t necessarily have an opinion as to how you should pursue your medical care, except you should certainly find the best doctors in the country to help you do that and then determine the best plan for you and your family. While you’re doing that, ideally, we’re out there doing what we do.

And if you come to us and you worked at the Warrick Power Plant, we can probably get a case filed pretty quickly because we know the defendants and the parties that provided asbestos to that plant. But time is always of the essence. It’s of the essence because of your medical situation and the potential consequences of the diagnosis of mesothelioma. And it’s also of the essence because unfortunately, you don’t have a ton of time under the law to pursue your case. It’s also of the essence because your co-workers are older and people that worked in the plant who can provide product identification and tell us what was there or testify about what was there, they’re getting older and there’s fewer of them today.

So, we want to be able to identify all those people and get them deposed, get you deposed. So it’s unfortunate. I wish I could tell people that they had more time and they could figure it all out, but you don’t have a lot of time. You don’t have a lot of time to figure out your medical plan. And you don’t have a lot of time to figure out your legal plan. And so it’s important to identify lawyers that not only practice mesothelioma cases, but have had experience with a particular location that you worked at or locations that you worked at, because that could have a critical impact on how quickly a case can get filed.

And the quicker that the case gets filed, the quicker resolution comes to you and your family. It can take a long time to finalize the case from beginning to end. So if it takes six months to get a case on file, well, it’s probably going to take at least two years, two and a half years, to completely wrap the case up. It may not seem like the difference between two months and six months is a huge difference, but for somebody with a terminal cancer, it’s a huge difference.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Cases?

John: And then another thing that you run into with mesothelioma cases is the statute of limitations. Can you talk a little bit about what the statute of limitations is in Indiana and how that relates or affects a mesothelioma claim like this?

Paul: Absolutely. In Indiana, you have two years basically from either the date of diagnosis or when or should know that you have a disease and what the cause of that disease is to file a claim. So it’s better than… I do a lot of cases in Kentucky and we only have one year. So two years better than one, but it certainly goes by fast. And as I’ve mentioned, you really don’t want to get anywhere close to that. You want to try to get that case filed as quickly as possible. You don’t want to run the risk that the judge disagrees with you and thinks you should have filed your case sooner. But more importantly, you just want to get that case filed so that you have a meaningful opportunity to participate in the case.

The statistics are not real good for prognosis for people with mesothelioma. It’s typically six months to 18 months from the time of diagnosis. There are certainly people, thank goodness, who live for years following diagnosis. But most people fit within that period of time. So getting the case filed and moving it along while you’re still able to participate, that’s our goal. We know that our clients, they want help for themselves and they want the peace of mind that what we’re doing is hopefully going to help their family. And they just want to be able to see that that’s happening before something terrible happens and they succumb to the disease.

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John. I appreciate it.

Get More Information About Asbestos Exposure Cases

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, you can visit the law firm of Satterley and Kelly at Satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

Did You Have a Vehicle Accident While Working?

If you’re injured on the job in a vehicle accident, you may receive injury compensation from different sources. Satterley & Kelley, PLLC lawyers represent clients injured by others in vehicle accidents, whether they’re on the job or not.

How Many People Drive as Part of Their Job?

You might need to drive for your job, whether that’s what you do full-time or how you get to where you need to be to work on construction sites, repair appliances, make sales presentations, or, in our case, appear in court for our clients. The more you’re on the road, the higher the risk you’ll be in an accident.

There were 54,750 nonfatal work-related transportation accidents causing one or more days of lost work in 2020, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). They also state that 1,778 fatalities were caused that year in work-related vehicle crashes.

About 30% of the US civilian workforce drove as part of their job as of 2016, according to the BLS. Those who delivered packages and worked in law enforcement spent more time on the road, while nurses drove the least of the 32 types of workers listed. Others who drive for their job include:

  • Construction managers
  • Insurance sales agents
  • Lawyers
  • Home health aides
  • Corrections officers
  • Construction laborers
  • Financial managers

BLS estimated that the share of those working in these positions who drive ranges from 70.5% to 10.5%. BLS also estimates that in March of this year, 1.9 million people were employed in Kentucky. If the 30% figure is still accurate, that means about 570,000 people in the state drive vehicles while on the job.

You Should Receive Workers’ Compensation Benefits If You’re Injured on the Job

You should collect workers’ compensation benefits if you are on the job while driving, in an accident, and injured. Workers’ compensation is a system of benefits for employees injured or ill due to their jobs. Injuries caused in a vehicle accident while driving somewhere to benefit your employer should be covered.

You could get the following benefits:

  • Partial replacement of your lost income
  • Compensation for a permanent disability
  • Vocational retraining, if you’re too disabled to go back to your job
  • Medical and rehabilitation care

If you’re killed in the accident, your next of kin can seek death benefits. Workers’ compensation benefits don’t include compensation for pain and suffering. You’ll also only get part of your lost income.

Filing an Insurance Claim or Lawsuit Against the At-Fault Parties May Be an Option

If you choose no-fault insurance, through your personal vehicle insurance, you may get benefits beyond what you get from workers’ comp. They should cover your medical care, but insurance may provide you the difference in your lost pay and any additional costs you’ve paid due to the accident.

Under certain circumstances, you can go beyond your no-fault coverage and file a claim with the other party’s insurer. If we can’t agree on a settlement, we may file a lawsuit seeking compensation for what workers’ compensation hasn’t provided you if the injuries result in at least $1,000.00 in medical bills or the following:

  • A permanent disfigurement
  • The fracture of a weight-bearing bone
  • The compressed, compound, or displaced fracture of any bone
  • A permanent injury
  • A permanent loss of a bodily function

If you decided not to take no-fault insurance, you could file a claim with the insurer covering the responsible party without these limitations or a lawsuit.

Who’s at Fault Matters in Insurance Claims and Lawsuits

Workers’ compensation is a no-fault system. You need not prove your employer caused your injuries, and you will receive benefits if you were hurt while on the job unless you were intoxicated or intentionally caused the accident.

Insurance claims and lawsuits are based on Kentucky’s system of comparative negligence. To be successful, you would need to prove the following negligence elements:

  • There was a relationship between you and the defendant (the party sued) because you both shared the road, and the defendant owed you a legal obligation or duty to do or refrain from doing something given the situation
  • The defendant failed that obligation or breached that duty
  • That failure or breach is the factual and legal (or proximate) cause of the accident and your injury
  • You were harmed by the accident
  • Under Kentucky law, the defendant must pay you damages (the harm you suffer measured in dollars)

Your damages recovery would be reduced by your share of the blame, if any, for causing the accident.

Your legal rights to compensation for a work-related injury not caused by your employer go beyond vehicle accidents. They apply to any situation where a third party’s negligence harms you, including a slip and fall, electrocution, a defective tool, burns caused by fire or chemicals, or an illness resulting from a toxic or biological exposure.

Speak To A Satterley & Kelley, PLLC Personal Injury Attorney Today

If you’re injured at work because of someone other than your employer, Satterley & Kelley PLLC lawyers are here to protect your interests and legal rights to compensation.

To schedule a free initial consultation to discuss your situation, call our Louisville office at 855-385-9532. If it’s more convenient, you can also complete our contact form.

Mesothelioma at Harvey Aluminum in Lewisport, KY (Podcast)

For years employees, contractors, and visitors to Harvey Aluminum in Lewisport, KY were exposed to dangerous asbestos. Since then, many have been diagnosed with mesothelioma and other asbestos exposure related diseases. Knowing what happened and what your legal rights are is essential for these types of cases.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher and I’m here today with Paul Kelly. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley and Kelly, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos clams. And today we’re talking about mesothelioma at Harvey Aluminum in Lewisport, Kentucky. Welcome Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey, John. How are you doing today?

John: I’m doing well. How are you?

Paul: Doing very well, thank you.

What is Harvey Aluminum?

John: So Paul, tell us a little bit about Harvey Aluminum, where they’re located and what they do.

Paul: So, Harvey Aluminum is located in Lewisport, Kentucky. It’s actually not called Harvey Aluminum anymore. It’s owned by a company called Aleris, and it’s changed hands a number of times over the years, but when it was built, it was Harvey Aluminum and the plant was built in the mid-1960s, I think 1966, 1967 when it was built and when it went online.

Harvey Aluminum is a aluminum rolling mill. So they take ingots or unfinished pieces of steel, aluminum and they run them through these mills. They flatten them into a piece that then they can ship out and sell to customers and other entities to make whatever it is that they make. And that plant has substantially been in operation for almost 50 years now, pretty much doing the same thing and has unfortunately had a fair amount of mesothelioma claims that have come out of it.

How is Harvey Aluminum Related to Asbestos and Mesothelioma Claims?

John: Okay. Yeah. So tell me a little bit more about that and how Harvey Aluminum is related to asbestos and mesothelioma claims

Paul: So, Harvey Aluminum built in 1966, unfortunately, that’s the timeframe where virtually every industrial plant, manufacturing plant, powerhouse was made with asbestos containing materials.

And the things that we see at Harvey Aluminum are pretty standard for that period of time. A lot of thermal insulation, thermal insulation that was wrapped around the piping, all the steam lines that run through the plant. A lot of the equipment operates off of steam. Steam, very hot hundreds of degrees running through these pipes. And so in order to maintain the internal temperature of the pipes that are wrapped with a high temperature thermal insulation, also to protect people from burning themselves from touching the pipes, this insulation would do that as well.

The problem is that it contained asbestos and when people were exposed to dust from the installation and removal of thermal insulation it would produce dust and people would breathe that dust, it gets deposited in the lungs. And many of those people developed cancer many years down the road.

A lot of the equipment ran off of steam as well. And there were piping that was connected to the rolling mills, and they had furnaces and ovens that also were wrapped in insulation. They had valves and pumps all throughout the plant. The valves would stop and start the flow of steam and chemical processes from flowing through. And so the valves would be necessary to stop and start that when necessary.

Lots of the valves were insulated. They contain asbestos packing that was shoved into the innards of the valves. Sometimes there was insulation that was actually covered the tops of the valves. There were pumps all throughout the plant. The pumps were all stuffed with asbestos packing.

There was something there called pot lines. Pot lines were where sometimes the raw ore was made and those pot lines were insulated. And the insulation contained asbestos gaskets, lots of piping that was connected together by two gaskets. There were flanges and then gaskets went around the flanges. And those gaskets for many, many years contained asbestos.

And so, there was just a wide variety of equipment that contained thermal insulation, contained packing, contained gaskets, contained refractory materials, and all those things throughout the ’60s and ’70s, ’80s. And even today there’s probably still asbestos located in that plant that people who work there at least have a potential to be exposed to.

What Types of Employees Were Exposed to Asbestos?

John: So, you talked about the different places where asbestos was used in the plant. What types of employees might’ve been exposed to asbestos because of that?

Paul: So, we have represented a lot of people that helped build the plant. A lot of millwrights. They millwrights install and set up the equipment like the rolling mills, and they’re around when the insulators, so insulators are exposed, and the insulators are the ones that insulate the pipes and equipment all throughout the plant.

The pipe fitters who install the pipes and also install the gaskets that we’ve talked about. They were heavily exposed group. You had electricians that were there for all the various installation of electrical equipment, cable, and then they’re being exposed both to the things that they’re installing. A lot of the wire and cable contain asbestos. But they’re also exposed during the installation process and during the gasket installation, during the packing installation. So a lot of the folks participate in construction.

In addition, you’ve got a huge maintenance staff to keep a plant like that. In operation they can’t afford to have downtime and so they had a maintenance staff that would fix pipes if pipes got busted. If a pipe carrying a hot temperature chemical or a high temperature steam broke, needed to be replaced or worked on in some way, they had to take the insulation off. And so the people that worked on those, usually just the maintenance staff, and they were heavily exposed.

The operators, the operators of all the equipment that worked in the plant. This equipment isn’t just some silent piece of equipment that is harmless and doesn’t do anything. The buildings vibrate, shake, any insulation that comes off of it. The operators are exposed. Sometimes they’re around when the maintenance staff is working on things that contain asbestos. So all the operators of the various equipment.

They had numerous additions, renovations, retrofitting of the plant. And so they had various outside contractors that came in and did a lot of work with the pipes, did a lot of work with the equipment, a lot of work with gaskets and valves and packing and pumps. And so all the same trades that worked in there during the construction process, the mill rights, insulators, electricians, pipe fitters, those kinds of crafts came in later on and did work in the facility. And they were exposed. We would see people who were more professional types, engineers, plant managers, superintendents.

Mesothelioma or asbestos and then the diseases that are caused by asbestos, predominantly mesothelioma, it doesn’t care what your job title is. All it cares about is what your exposure is. And so if you show up in a shirt and tie every day because that was your job, but there’s lots of asbestos that’s being removed and installed when you’re there, you get an exposure.

And those type of people who didn’t work hands-on with the product, they were frequently exposed, and it frequently developed cancers and other asbestos diseases as a result of that exposure.

Certainly, people who may have visited the plant on more than one or two off occasions, even they’re not doing anything, they were exposed. And the differences in how plants treated asbestos back then versus how they treat it today are profound.

And so, a lot of people would come in and out of those facilities. I mean just people delivering products. I mean, a plant like that has trucks and deliveries every day. And lots of times people who were just merely delivering products we’re getting exposed to asbestos when they came into the plant.

And unfortunately, we’ve seen a number of people whose spouse or parent worked in the plant. The spouse or parent was heavily exposed. The asbestos got on their clothing, they took the clothing home unknowingly, it got into their home and their child or their spouse years later developed mesothelioma. And their only possible exposure, based on their history, was from their parent or their spouses, the asbestos that they brought home on their clothing.

So the bottom line is the people that performed any work in that plant under any appreciable period of time, and by appreciable I mean more than a day or two, they were exposed and they were at risk of developing disease. And unfortunately, we’ve seen a number of people who did in fact develop disease after either working in the plant or their loved one worked in the plant.

Did Office Workers Get Exposed to Asbestos?

John: Right? And like you said, even people who worked in the offices there at the plant, they wouldn’t just stay in the office all the time. They’d be taking trips down to the floor of the manufacturing plant where all the machines are and things like that. You wouldn’t work in a place like that and never come into contact with those places, or come into contact with some of the workers who are down there, like you said, the foreman or the supervisor or something like that. So yeah, almost anybody who worked there would’ve had at least some exposure.

Paul: I mean, virtually impossible. I mean, they probably had cleaning people who cleaned the offices and those areas. And what we’ve heard from a lot of people is, and this is just a fact, it’s impossible to remove the asbestos. And so it’s just there.

So even when they’re not working directly with asbestos products, I mean if somebody comes through and used compressed air on their workstation at the conclusion of a day, and there is asbestos in the area, they’re just swirling the asbestos about it just moves from space to space.

And so yeah, people that worked in the office, I mean if they walk through the plant 15 minutes a day for 10 years, they’re getting one massive exposure over the course of that period of time.

Do they have the same risk as the people that worked eight hours a day in it for 10 years? No, they don’t. But they had a very substantial risk. And the process, the disease process, mesothelioma, there is no safe exposure. Science has not identified any threshold level for which disease couldn’t be caused.

And so even a few hour exposure, even a day of exposure has been known to cause somebody to suffer from mesothelioma. So hundreds, if not thousands of people that worked in that plan over the last 60 years, they’re at risk. And unfortunately, we’ve seen some people who’ve suffered the consequences of that risk.

What Should Someone Exposed to Asbestos Do Next?

John: So, if somebody did work at Harvey Aluminum and now they have mesothelioma, what should they do next?

Paul: So, mesothelioma is a terminal disease. A lot of progress has been made over the years in prolonging people’s lives and increasing the quality of their life. But unfortunately, the stark reality is that most people will pass away from it within a couple of years of the diagnosis and some a lot sooner. A lot of the people that were exposed the heaviest, a lot of my clients, and they were exposed in the ’60s and ’70s, and that’s a long time ago.

And so, you’ve got two things that you have to worry about, and you have to worry about your medical care and figuring out the best path for you medically as to how you’re going to treat this cancer.

There are surgeries that are available, there’s chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy. Some people don’t choose any of those things depending on where you are in the country, particularly in Kentucky, we have a lot of fantastic doctors and specialists in Kentucky, but mesothelioma is a pretty rare disease.

And so, some people travel outside of Kentucky for different types of options. And so when you’re diagnosed with this disease, figuring out the best medical path for you and your family obviously is anybody’s biggest concern.

But right alongside that, you have to consider your legal options. And that’s where we come in. You need to speak with an attorney, speak with an attorney that does mesothelioma cases. This is a very specialized area of the law. Not a lot of lawyers do what we do. History matters.

This particular plant, like many plants in Kentucky, we’ve represented multiple people that worked in the plant over a period of time. And so it’s important to hire somebody that knows what they’re doing, both from the type of case, but also has experience with a particular location that you’re at.

Memories don’t get better. Evidence typically doesn’t get better over the passage of time. You want to do everything you can do to give yourself the best chance possible to be successful. I’ll be perfectly blunt with everybody. The best evidence I’m ever going to have as a lawyer is my client’s testimony.

And if my client can give a deposition, hopefully can be at trial. But if my client can give a deposition and tell me, the judge, the jury, defense counsel, how they were exposed to asbestos in a particular plant like Harvey Aluminum, that is going to go a long way in assisting us help you and your family.

If somebody becomes too ill or they pass away before we’re able to do that, it’s not impossible. In fact, it’s very possible that we can develop the evidence, but it is a lot harder because nobody else experienced what you experienced. You’re the only one and you’re the only one that can really give the full story. Your coworkers can give a decent account and they can certainly provide enough information that may assist in being successful. Sometimes though, that’s not possible, sometimes there are no coworkers. They’ve passed away too. They’re gone for whatever reason.

So unfortunately, while you have this unfortunate medical situation that you’re dealing with, it’s important to go ahead and figure out all of your legal options and try to hit the ground running on that so that while you’re dealing with your medical lawyers like us or whomever you feel comfortable with, can investigate, get the lawsuit filed and hopefully everything lines up so that when you have your medical plan figured out that we have the legal plan figured out, and we can then do everything in a way that makes sense for you and your family and is not invasive. It gives you the best chance possible.

Waiting almost never works. And if somebody contacts me in 11 months and we have a one-year statute of limitations, the good news is I can probably get something filed. But if you call the wrong person and that person can’t get to me until 13 months, well then the statute of limitations may be gone and you’ve lost your ability to pursue a case.

So sometimes it takes a little bit of investigation to figure it out. Not everything’s easy. So time is of the essence not wasting time. And I hate to use the word waste because once you get to that point, all time is precious.

But for what we do and for what we can do for you, the sooner that you can let us start working for you, we believe the better the outcome’s going to be for you and your family.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Cases?

John: Talk a little bit more about that one-year statute of limitations and what that means and how that’s calculated, and also who is it in a mesothelioma case that you’re actually suing?

Paul: Sure. So in Kentucky where I’m at, we have a one-year statute of limitations. It’s really one year from the date that you know or should know you have an injury and what the cause of that injury is. And that’s not always a year from your diagnosis. Sometimes it could be a little bit longer than that.

However, if you file that case within one year of your diagnosis, then you’re good, there’s no chance that a court could dismiss your case.

If you file it after the year and claim, well, I really didn’t know what caused my injury or I didn’t know for sure that it was asbestos related, then you’re really at peril of your case being dismissed.

So, we will always file your case well within the year, we would try to file your case very quickly within a month or two if you come into us, if not sooner. But certainly the rule of thumb is get that lawsuit filed within a year from the diagnosis, and you have absolutely no problem.

Most of our judges would certainly like to give you the benefit of the doubt and try to maintain your lawsuit, but the law is very harsh in that regard, and they don’t have much discretion. So even if they want to maintain your case, if they think that you filed it late and that you should have known and filed it earlier, they don’t have any discretion and they’ve got to dismiss your claim.

John: Right. They can’t just start making exceptions for people and then all breaks loose and everybody starts filing their cases late.

Paul: Absolutely. And the law has established some clear delineable exceptions that the court can follow, but that’s not that. Yeah, it’s just rolling the dice at that point, hoping for the best.

But as we said, we don’t want to get anywhere close to that because we want to hit the ground running and give you the very best chance of being successful and waiting the 10, 11 months after the diagnosis occurred. That’s probably not going to be the best recipe for success.

Not that it’s not impossible, it just is harder. And then to answer your question about who could be sued, it depends on who you are. It depends on whether you were a direct employee of Harvey Aluminum or the company that owns it. Now, if you’re a direct employee, you can’t sue the employer. We have workers’ compensation protection under Kentucky Law, and that’s true for most states.

And so typically speaking, we would not be able to sue your employer. But, there’s manufacturers of products, there are distributors of products, there are contractors that installed some of the products that are all still out there. Everything’s a little unique depending on the timeframe that you work there and the individual facts of your case.

Now, if you happen to be a contractor or an employee of the contractor that worked at the plant, you very well may be able to sue the plant owner directly. And so that’s a possibility. And sometimes we’ve seen cases where the victim person with mesothelioma was the child of an employee of the company. And under those circumstances you can sue that company because the child didn’t work there. So they don’t get any sort of protections.

So everything’s kind of dependent on the particular circumstances of your facts, but there’s generally speaking, a pretty wide cast of defendants that can be pursued or in some instances a narrow set, but a very culpable set of defendants that can be held accountable for causing your disease.

And lots of times in a plant like this, we already know who to go after, but you may tell us something that increases or decreases who we can sue.

John: All right, well that’s all really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John.

Get Legal Help for Asbestos Exposure

John: And for more information about mesothelioma or asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley and Kelly at SatterleyLaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

Steps to Avoid Motorcycle Accidents

As the temperatures rise, more Kentuckians will be on their motorcycles. If you ride one, you have a much greater risk of severe or fatal injuries than someone in a vehicle. Here is some advice to help you avoid an accident, but if you have one, lessen the injuries you suffer. They may also help you get as much compensation as possible from an insurance claim or lawsuit against the party causing your accident.

Compensation claims for injuries caused by accidents are based on negligence law. Kentucky has comparative negligence laws. Even if you’re partially to blame for the accident you can recover compensation, but your share of the blame will reduce it. That compensation can also be reduced if you made mistakes that worsened your injuries.

Insurance companies love blaming accident victims for their injuries. If you avoid negligent acts that could lead to an accident and take steps to be as safe as possible, you will simplify your case and maximize your recovery. Not being the safest or smartest motorcyclist won’t necessarily prevent recovery, but you’ll face obstacles that need not be in your way.

Never Ride While Impaired

Riding while impaired increases your chances of an accident. That impairment can be caused by the following:

  • Alcohol
  • Drugs, legal or illegal
  • Fatigue

You don’t need to be drunk, high, or falling asleep to be impaired. Just a single drink, one allergy pill, or missing a couple of hours of sleep may be enough (and they will be plenty if you have a combination of these issues). You risk being unable to perceive the dangers of your ride or respond to them effectively or quickly enough to keep you upright.

Always Wear a Helmet

Kentucky law requires you to use a helmet under limited circumstances. It’s mandatory if:

  • You’re younger than 21
  • Have an instruction permit
  • Have your motorcycle license for less than a year

If you fall into these categories and get into an accident without a helmet and suffer a head injury, the insurance company will argue that you broke the law and ran the risk, and their insured shouldn’t take the blame. Whether that’s a valid argument depends on the facts of the situation, but at the very least, expect a cut in the recovery you may have received otherwise.

Even if you need not wear a helmet under Kentucky law, failing to do so will hurt your injury claim. Just because doing something is legal doesn’t make it a good idea. Using a helmet reduces the risk of suffering head injuries, including those that may kill you, according to a 2008 medical journal article.

The fact something solid like a helmet on your head will offer more protection if it hits another vehicle, the pavement, or another hard object than riding without one is not rocket science. It’s common sense.

Head injuries can cause catastrophic brain damage that can shorten or severely limit your life. It may be the bulk of your injury compensation claim, and if you rode without a helmet, you may end up with a fraction of an award you would’ve received otherwise.

Always Ride Defensively

You must be aware of your surroundings at all times. That includes vehicles in your lane, oncoming traffic, bicyclists, pedestrians, and road conditions. You need to plan evasive action to prevent an accident or at least reduce your injuries if one happens.

Issues you should be aware of include:

  • Accidents involving vehicles turning into the path of motorcycles are common, so don’t assume a driver in the opposite lane approaching an intersection or driveway will stay there
  • Be wary of potholes, frost heaves, or spilled oil on the road, which could cause you to lose control
  • The faster you travel and the less light, the more difficult defensive driving becomes. You’ll have a harder time seeing possible threats and less time to react

Don’t let your guard down if you’re close to home. Many accidents happen when drivers near the end of their trip. They’re more relaxed in familiar territory and assume they’re safer than they are.

Speak To a Satterley & Kelley, PLLC Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Today

If you or a family member is injured in a Kentucky motorcycle accident, we want to hear from you because we can help you recover the full and fair compensation you deserve. Let us be your boots on the ground and guide you through the process.

If you want to speak with an experienced lawyer at our firm, contact our Louisville office to schedule a free initial consultation. Call us at 502-589-5600 or reach us online through our contact form.

Mesothelioma at Anaconda Aluminum Co. in Sebree, KY (Podcast)

In this podcast, John Maher and attorney Paul Kelley discuss Anaconda Aluminum Co in Sebree, KY. Many people who worked in and around this facility were exposed to asbestos and may be suffering from mesothelioma or other related diseases as a result. Learning about potential legal rights from this situation is essential.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher, and I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos claims.

Today we’re talking about mesothelioma at Anaconda Aluminum Company in Sebree, Kentucky. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey, John. How are you doing today?

John: Well, how are you?

Paul: I’m great, thank you.

About Anaconda Aluminum Company and Asbestos

John: So, Paul, tell us a little bit about Anaconda Aluminum Company, what they are, where they’re located.

Paul:  So, Anaconda Aluminum is an aluminum smelting operation that’s located in Sebree, Kentucky West or Central Kentucky. And it was built approximately in 1972, 1973. It’s changed hands a few times over the years. A lot of these aluminum companies are bought up by other companies, but the timeframe that we were most interested in it, it was Anaconda Aluminum and it made aluminum products and it was a smelting operation. And so what they did as a smelting operation is they took raw ore and they basically heated it and it produced a steel or aluminum product. And then that product was actually sent somewhere else to make another piece. And then that was sent somewhere else into the final customer for whatever it is that they did with it.

There are a lot of smelting and rolling mill operations in that area of Kentucky, and Anaconda Aluminum was one of them. And it still operates today under a different name. I think a company called Century Aluminum operates that facility in Sebree now, and it’s provided a product continuously for over 50 years now.

John: Okay. And so how was Anaconda Aluminum related to asbestos and mesothelioma cancer claims?

Paul: Well, so this again is one of those time periods where the plant was built right at the time that the Occupational Safety and Health Act was enacted. And before that time, virtually every industrial plant in the United States was constructed with asbestos. And even though this plant kind of came up right at the time that OSHA was enacted and became into operation, it was constructed with asbestos. And we know that because we have had the opportunity to help some people that worked there during the construction phase, during operations, and then that wide variety of stuff. And so they had thermal insulation was located all throughout the facility.

The plant had lots of steam piping located throughout the plant. These steam pipes carried steam that was hundreds of degrees in temperature Fahrenheit, and they were wrapped with asbestos. Lots of the piping contained chemicals that were very hot and they were wrapped with asbestos. The steel at that facility or the aluminum at that facility, they were made in something called pots. There were pot lines in the plant. And so the pot lines were just these long rows of pots. And the pots were significant size and diameter, several feet probably in diameter and several feet high. And they were where liquid was poured in to essentially make the ingot and the pots were insulated with asbestos. And there were lots of them, hundreds of pots that were in the plant. And they contain refractory material, they contain insulation, and all of those materials were contained asbestos at one point in time.

The pipes were frequently connected together, the pipes were connected to the gaskets. Gaskets contained asbestos during that period of time. There were valves all throughout the plant. The valves all were packed with asbestos packing. There were pumps that were all throughout the plant. The pumps were also stuffed with asbestos packing. There was just a wide variety of insulating products that were located throughout the plant. And probably some of those products are still there today. But certainly, when the plant was in operation in the seventies and eighties, it was all over the place and there were lots of people in various capacities that were exposed to it for many, many years.

What Types of Employees at Anaconda Aluminum May have Been Exposed to Asbestos?

John: So, who were some of the types of employees that might’ve been exposed to asbestos when working here at Anaconda Aluminum?

Paul: Sure. So of course, there are people that constructed the plant and there was a lot of different crafts that participated in building that plant. There were millwrights and the millwrights put in a lot of the equipment conveyors. They put the pot lines in. There was insulators, insulators insulated the pipes and the pot lines and other equipment in the plant. There were pipe fitters and the pipe fitters installed all the piping and they put the gaskets in. Lots of times, the pipe fitters and the millwrights both installed the gaskets and the valves, and the pumps. With the asbestos packing, there were electricians that worked in the plant. There were engineers that worked in the plant that all participated in the construction phase of it.

Then the plant came into operation and you had all the people that operated the equipment. You had maintenance staff plant of this size, and it was a many-acres facility plant that size. It’s going to have a lot of maintenance people that are participating in the day-to-day affairs of keeping the plant running. It was an aluminum smelting operation. They couldn’t afford to have large periods of inactivity. And so they made sure that they kept it running and lots of times maintenance staff would have to fix equipment and tear insulation off in order to do that or pull pipes apart to contain gaskets and have to scrape those gaskets off frequently. They would’ve overhauls of the equipment that was in the plant. So like the pot lines, for example, they had to be relined every now and again, or the pots that were in the lines had to be relined. And so somebody would come in and they’d tear all that insulation out. That was typically the mill rights. Sometimes it was insulators. And those kinds of people would be exposed when they did that.

Eventually, they might have had some people that come in to remove those things permanently. And even though they supposedly used the latest, greatest, safest, best methods, there’s still a potential for exposure for people to perform those types of activities. I mean, even people like the plant superintendent or the general foreman, the engineers, the people who worked in an office somewhere, if they walk through the plant, they were exposed.

If they spent time out there supervising their staff, they were exposed. People who delivered products to the plant when it was an operation, the custodians of the facility, people that might’ve worked in the offices cleaning, but they had to go through the plant, visitors to the plant for whatever reason. I’m not necessarily saying this happened at Anaconda, but I’ve heard numerous places that they would have parties for families right there in the plant at various points in time and people would be exposed to whatever was in the plant because once asbestos is there, it’s always there. And it can be disturbed in numerous ways if it’s not…

How Does Someone Get Exposed to Asbestos?

John: It might be in the air, or it might be on a surface, and then somebody touches that surface and it gets in the air and you can breathe it in.

Paul: Absolutely. I mean, if it’s on the floor and people are shuffling their feet, it gets disturbed. If there’s a window open and a breeze comes through, it can get disturbed. It takes highly specialized equipment to remove asbestos. And most companies didn’t do that until much, much later when they needed to get it out because of more stringent regulations and that sort of thing.

So there were a lot of people and a lot of different crafts who were regularly exposed. And then there was a lot of people who spent a little bit less time or maybe didn’t do things directly hands-on, and they were exposed too. We’ve heard Dr. Selikoff is one of the most famous scientists, physicians, researchers of mesothelioma. He kind of blew the door open on exposing the health risks associated with asbestos. And then this disease process, mesothelioma, and Dr. Selikoff is famous for saying, “Asbestos doesn’t care what job you had. Asbestos doesn’t care who you are, what your education is. All asbestos cares about is do you have lungs and did it get into your lungs?”

And if that’s what happened, then you were at substantial risk for contracting disease. Some people at a higher risk than others. But certainly, if you worked in that plant, you had a heck of a lot higher risk of contracting mesothelioma than people who worked in office like I do and don’t go to places like that. It was a tough place and it was a place where people had a lot of exposure and a lot of people had exposure over the years.

Were Office Employees Exposed to Asbestos?

John: But even if you worked in the office, say at Anaconda Aluminum, like you said, the likelihood that you would never go into the manufacturing plant and get exposure there is unlikely. They had parties there, company parties and things like that. And then, of course, you’re coming into contact with other people who probably do work down on the manufacturing floor. So there’s just no getting away from it.

Paul: Absolutely. I mean, if you worked in the office and you never went into the plant, you weren’t doing your job. And I doubt that that was a realistic scenario. And in fact, I know it’s not realistic because I’ve talked to a lot of people that had those kinds of jobs and they were exposed. It was a pervasive exposure, and it was one that you couldn’t avoid unless you were fortunate enough not to set foot in the plant. But even then, we’ve seen family members of plant workers who were diagnosed with mesothelioma, and their only known exposure was to their loved one’s clothing.

A lot of people, let’s just use as an example, the insulators that came and insulated those pots, they didn’t know. And so they got asbestos all over their clothes. They did the very best they could to blow them off of the air compressor at the end of the shift, but they didn’t know any better. So they got in their cars, they drove home, asbestos fell all throughout their car. They get to their house, they hug their kids, they sit on their couch, they shuffle in through their carpeting and unbeknownst to them, they’ve exposed the whole family to asbestos.

And they do that every day, day in and day out.

John: Sure.

Paul: And so even people who didn’t work in the plant were exposed. And to the extent that there are still people out there that are alive that were exposed in that way, I will predict that there’ll be a handful of them that will develop mesothelioma.

What Should You Do if You are Diagnosed with Mesothelioma?

John: Right. So if you have mesothelioma now, and you worked in the Anaconda Aluminum Company plant, what should you do next?

Paul: I think it’s important to determine what your legal rights are. What I think most people do when they are diagnosed with this disease is they start to research it. And you’ll probably find things from me and other lawyers and you’ll find things from medical providers. And so you’ve got a lot of decisions you have to make. One, of course, is determine what the best medical plan is for you and your family. And there’s so many different options, and you can discuss that with your team of doctors that most likely you have. But you also have to determine whether or not you have a lawsuit. And so this particular facility, the Anaconda facility, I mean, I can tell you that you’ve got a potential claim that you can pursue against a number of entities and potentially even Anaconda depending on who you are.

But unfortunately, time doesn’t stand still for you. And while you have this really important medical issues that you have to determine, you also need to figure out your legal plan as well. It’s important to hire attorneys that you’re comfortable with. It’s important that you hire that have experience with asbestos and mesothelioma cases. And I think it’s really important that you hire attorneys that have experience with the particular location that you worked.

The difference between getting your case filed in a month or two versus six or eight months could have devastating consequences. Most people, unfortunately, are going to die from this disease, mesothelioma within six to 18 months of getting the diagnosis. And some may live for a bit. They get really sick. And the best evidence I’m ever going to have, what your exposure was, how you were exposed, how long you worked there, and all the things that we have to navigate through in order to be successful, it’s going to come from you.

And so it’s important that a case gets filed while you still have the ability to participate. And the sincere hope is that you live for five years beyond diagnosis. You live for years beyond the lawsuit. But unfortunately, the stark reality is that things may not work out the way you want from a health standpoint. And in order to help you in the short run, your family in the long run, I think it’s important to go ahead and get things going.

Memories fade, evidence is lost. There’s just a variety of negative consequences that occur from delay. And by the way, when a case is filed, our adversaries have every incentive to slow things down, to stop progress. And so the last thing we want to do is give them an assist and impede our own progress. So it’s important while you’re assessing and evaluating and determining your medical plan, it’s also important for you to assess and evaluate and determine your legal plan.

What is the Statute of Limitations in Kentucky for Asbestos Cases?

John: So, is there a statute of limitations in Kentucky for filing a claim against Anaconda Aluminum, and how does that play a role in a mesothelioma claim like this?

Paul: Absolutely. In Kentucky, we have one year from the day that you know or should know that you have an injury and no one should know the cause of your injury. So it’s not necessarily the date of diagnosis. However, we always file within a year of diagnosis just to make sure there’s no problems. But more importantly, we want to get that lawsuit filed as quickly as possible. As I alluded to a moment ago, there’s just a wide variety of reasons why six months or eight months or 10 months down the road, evidence may be lost, your ability to participate, so we don’t want to do anything or either to increase the risk that you won’t be able to participate in your case.

But that having been said, there’s all kinds of different reasons as to why cases get close to the statute. It’s really important to get it filed within that year. Even if a judge would like for you to be able to pursue your case, if the judge believes that you filed it late, they don’t have much discretion. And so it’s important to get the case filed.

Because it’s important to get the case filed, it’s important to talk to lawyers early. It’s important to give the lawyers the opportunity to investigate so that we don’t run the risk ourselves of getting close and still not really knowing everything. This particular location that we’re talking about today, I know a lot about, but there could be other locations that you’ve worked at that we still have to conduct some investigation, figure out, talk to witnesses, try to find documents and that sort of thing.

So, the later we’re able to get started, the longer it takes to get the case filed, the longer it takes to get the case filed, the longer it takes to start receiving compensation from the parties that have caused your cancer. And then we, of course, know how much you need it for yourself, and we also know how much your family needs that financial assistance. So, delay, waiting, it’s almost never a good thing.

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John. I appreciate it.

Get More Information About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

The Agency Responsible for Inspecting Federal Buildings for Asbestos Is Failing to Do So

The federal government is running about a $828 billion budget deficit this fiscal year. One way to help reduce that is to sell unused federal office buildings. But that’s complicated by the fact that two-thirds of federal buildings, occupied or not, haven’t been checked for asbestos within the last five years.

The presence or absence of asbestos in a building is required information because the government would decide whether to abate the asbestos before a sale or inform potential buyers of the building’s status, according to Reason. Asbestos in a building would cut the number of potential buyers, and those who bid on it would probably offer less than if asbestos wasn’t a problem.

Inspection Policies Ignored

The federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) GAO reviewed the General Services Administration’s (GSA) policy on environmental contaminants in federal properties. The GSA manages federal properties.

The GSA may be responsible for cleaning up environmental contaminants (like asbestos) on a federal property it manages if the building is sold. If an agency wants to sell one of its unneeded buildings, it must tell GSA of contaminants so they can be removed or disclosed to the next owner.

GSA policy requires a baseline asbestos inspection for buildings built before 1998, with re-inspection surveys every five years unless a prior inspection finds no asbestos, according to a GAO report. Yearly inspections of buildings with asbestos are required to determine if the asbestos products’ condition changed.

GSA has fallen short of its requirements. GAO found it hasn’t completed asbestos inspections for about two-thirds of its buildings in the last five years. That means 638 out of 955 buildings were not in compliance. That includes:

  • 228 buildings where the date of the last inspection is unknown
  • 410 buildings whose last inspection was more than five years ago
  • 214 of these buildings were inspected more than ten years ago

The report found that 15 of the 22 properties GSA sold during fiscal years 2018 through 2022 likely had asbestos or other contaminants. GSA stated this wasn’t an important issue since they can sell properties “as is” if they provide proper disclosures.

GSA Promises to Clean Up Its Act, Sort of

GSA responded to the GAO report by stating it was updating its policies away from annual inspections. They plan to prioritize inspections based on the risk of dangerously degraded asbestos in buildings. Testing would be done if asbestos products were found to be degraded or disturbed. But that risk assessment requires knowledge of all of GSA’s buildings, which it lacks due to its failure to inspect them regularly.

Mesothelioma at Alcoa in Newburgh, IN (Podcast)

In this podcast, John Maher talks with Attorney Paul Kelley about Mesothelioma and other Asbestos related issues that people face. Many people who worked at or around an Alcoa facility in Newburgh, IN have been victims of these conditions and need to know about their legal options.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher and I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos claims. Today we’re talking about mesothelioma at Alcoa in Newburgh, Indiana. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Good morning, John. How are you doing today?

John: I’m doing good, thanks. How are you?

Paul: Doing well, thank you.

What is Alcoa in Indiana?

John: So Paul, tell us a little bit about Alcoa in Indiana and what they do.

Paul: So, Alcoa is a aluminum steel producing plant. It has a smelting operation as well as a rolling mill. The smelting operation is for them to take the raw ore, heat it up, and extract it, basically into the beginning of a finished product. Metal, iron, steel, something along those lines, usually made in the form of an ingot, which is going to vary in size from small to very large.

The rolling mill operation is where they take those ingots and they essentially flatten those pieces into some sort of size so that they can produce something else with it later on, or a customer can produce something with it later on. The Alcoa facility was a massive plant. It was built in 1960. I think that has operated in some form for 60 years. Employed thousands of people over the years. Had dozens of types of crafts that worked in there. Had hundreds of contractors that worked in the facility at one point or another. It was a big plant and it produced a lot of product for a lot of years supporting the area that I’m in. Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois provided steel and aluminum all throughout the country.

How was Alcoa Related to Asbestos and Mesothelioma Cancer Cases?

John: Okay. And so how was Alcoa related to asbestos and mesothelioma cancer cases?

Paul: Well, unfortunately, given the time period that Alcoa was built, the facility went up around 1960. That is a classic period of time that plants were built with asbestos containing materials. The predominant things that we would see would be thermal insulation that was used throughout the plant. Steam was used to power equipment and machinery. We’ll talk about it at another time, but there was a powerhouse next door that provided power to the Alcoa facility. Those power was provided through steam turbines and steam boilers, and the piping that was connected between the two plants were all insulated with asbestos.

Many of the machines, the rolling mills, the smelters had piping connected to them that were insulated with asbestos. They had something in the smelting area. They had something called potlines, and the potlines were the areas where the steel and aluminum was smelted, and each potline had many, many different pots. The pots were substantial in size. Many, many inches in diameter, and the potlines were insulated with refractory material and other thermal insulation that all contain asbestos during this period of time.

There was something there called hot tops that were put over these pots and the hot tops were intended to capture metal impurities that would be produced during the smelting process and hot tops contained asbestos. The pipes were connected frequently with gaskets and the gaskets for a long period of time contained asbestos. The plant had pumps and valves all throughout. Valves that are controlling the flow of steam and water and chemicals from various pipes to various pieces of equipment. The valves frequently were stuffed with asbestos-containing packing material. It was just a fibrous material that frequently came in sheets or rolls, and it was shoved into the valves. Pumps. The pumps were there to operate a lot of the machines. Connected to pipes, connected to valves, connected to machines, and lots of the pumps that had asbestos-containing packing in them as well.

You would have asbestos-containing floor tiles, ceiling tile in offices throughout the plant. So many pieces of equipment had to be insulated. Ovens. They had lots of ovens that were there and the ovens had firebrick and refractory material. They contained asbestos, just a wide variety of things. It was pretty common for that period of time that this plant was built in an operation, but certainly there was a lot of it that was there. And a lot of people that have either worked directly for Alcoa or who worked for contractors that worked in the plant have been exposed to asbestos frequently, again, over the last 50, 60, 70 years.

When Were Alcoa Employees Exposed to Asbestos?

John: Right. So how and when were the employees at Alcoa exposed to asbestos? It sounds like it could have been almost anybody who worked at that facility given the wide range of different places where asbestos was found.

Paul: Absolutely, John. So first, you had the people that helped build the plant, and again, the facility came online in 1960, so it was going to be built in the late fifties. They had several renovations and additions, but the people that built. You had insulators that insulated the pipes and the equipment. You had electricians that worked all throughout the plant, connecting wires and equipment together. Lots of times, I forgot to mention, that a lot of electric wires and cables contained asbestos insulation, so electricians were exposed.

Millwrights. Millwrights were heavily involved in the construction of power houses. Those potlines that we talked about. Millwrights typically installed the pots into the potlines and then the insulators came along and insulated the insides of the potlines. And so millwrights were exposed. Pipe fitters were exposed, pipe fitters connected and installed all of the piping. They were the ones that dealt with the gaskets. If they weren’t the ones that insulated the pipes, they were certainly present when the pipes were insulated. So certainly anybody that was involved in the construction process.

Then, you’ve got the people who were required to maintain the facility. It’s a huge plant and they had a very substantial maintenance staff for most of their existence, and all the maintenance folks who worked on pipes and worked on equipment installed gaskets, took out gaskets, removed piping, replaced piping. They had to take insulation off, they had to reinstall insulation.

They were present for the reinstallation of insulation. And so anybody that certainly worked in the maintenance aspect. These plants have to be updated, from time to time, and so there would be various crafts that we come in. So all the same types of crafts that participate in the construction of the plant also came in at various points in time to update and renovate.

We’ve had engineers who worked in the plant who participate in designing certain features, and then they were diagnosed with asbestos diseases many years down the road. Anybody that was involved in supervisory positions, so they didn’t necessarily deal with any of the asbestos products hands-on, but they were present frequently when all of that work happened, and so they were exposed.

We would see companies who would send people in to oversee some of the installation of things like the potlines and the furnaces and ovens and things like that, and then they were exposed during those processes. So you led us off the right way. If you worked in that plant from the 1960s to 1980s, even for a brief period of time, there is a strong likelihood that you were exposed to asbestos from whatever you did. The degree of exposure is certainly going to be dependent on the type of work that you did, with people like the millwrights and electricians, pipefitters, insulators. They certainly were going to have the heaviest exposures, but if you were in that plant for any appreciable period of time, there was virtually no way to avoid being exposed to injurious levels of asbestos.

What Should You Do if You were Diagnosed with Mesothelioma?

John: Okay. So then if you were an employee of Alcoa and now you have mesothelioma or asbestosis or another asbestos related disease, what should you do?

Paul: Well, most of the people that we talk to, John, have a disease called mesothelioma. It’s uniquely associated with asbestos exposure and unfortunately, there’s no cure for it. It’s a fatal disease. Most people are going to die from that disease within 6 to 18 months from diagnosis. It’s a devastating diagnosis, and there’s a lot of things that people have to deal with when it occurs.

Obviously, the most important aspect of anybody’s life when that occurs is what medical treatment are you going to receive? What’s the best approach for you and your family? Age has an impact, overall health condition has an impact, geography has an impact, where you are. Sometimes you have different options depending on where you are in the country. So certainly, everybody who’s diagnosed with this disease needs to quickly get a firm grasp on what their medical plan’s going to be. That’s usually something that is dealt with in conjunction with your family, your treating physicians, which will be a team of folks, from surgeons to family practitioners, pulmonologists, oncologists to radiology oncologists. And so it’s an overwhelming process and procedure.

Unfortunately, while you’re doing that, time doesn’t stand still, and there are certainly legal remedies that you have for contracting this terrible disease, particularly if you worked at a place like Alcoa, where I assure you there are parties that can be held accountable for causing you this disease. In Kentucky, and Alcoa is in Indiana, but all states have a statute of limitations. And so, the problem is while you’re trying to figure out the best approach for your medical treatment, you also have to try to figure out the best approach for how you’re going to pursue or if you’re going to pursue any claim. And so my recommendation to everybody is you need to get on it as quickly as possible and consult with an attorney to determine all of your legal rights and options that you have.

Attorneys who do this, like me, don’t generally start from scratch on a case. And so, once you speak with that attorney, the attorney can, generally speaking, give you a lot of information right away, tell you what can and can’t be done, and then they worry, worry about it. You hire me, your problem becomes my problem, and I focus on the legal aspects of it, and you focus on what you need to focus on, which is your family and your health and the things that you need to do to stay as healthy as possible.

Time is of the essence. As I said, you only have so much period of time to file your lawsuit. But even more importantly, considering or determining what your health situation is, you may have even less time than what the statute of limitations provides. And so you don’t want to waste time. And I know it’s hard and there’s so many other things that people have to deal with, but it’s really important to speak with an attorney, hire an attorney that you feel comfortable with, hire an attorney that knows what they’re doing.

You can’t really afford to hire somebody that’s never handled an asbestos mesothelioma case before. You can’t really afford to hire somebody that dabbles in this kind of litigation because this litigation isn’t for somebody that dabbles. It’s for somebody that has done it over and over and over again and knows what to do. And so my advice is to speak with an attorney immediately and hire somebody that you’re comfortable with as soon as you possibly can so that you can hit the ground running.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Asbestos Related Cases?

John: Right. Now, you mentioned the statute of limitations. What is the statute of limitations in Indiana and can you file a claim as an employee against your employer in Indiana or do you have to find other parties to go after with the claim?

Paul: Typically speaking, you can’t file a claim against your employer in Indiana. You can file a workers’ compensation claim and sometimes, very rarely, there are exceptions of that rule. However, you can sue manufacturers of products, you can sue suppliers, distributors, you can sue contractors. There’s still a wealth of parties that can be held responsible. Now, if you were not a direct Alcoa employee and you worked for one of those contractors, or sometimes we have employees or sometimes we have clients who didn’t work for the company but their husband or their spouse did. And in those circumstances you can sue Alcoa. We call them a household exposure case, so that’s always possible.

But in Indiana, the statute of limitations is two years to file a claim. And two years certainly seems like a long time, but it can go by very quickly. And even more importantly, we don’t want to get anywhere close to that statute of limitations. You have so many things that can make that time go by quickly. Memories don’t get better over the course of time. Companies, just as a matter of practice, they destroy and discard documents every so often. There are some companies that destroy them once they hear about lawsuits as well. So getting something filed as quickly as possible. But you do have a couple of years to investigate and to figure out all the parties and all the responsible entities that may be held accountable for causing your disease.

John: And is that two years from when you’re diagnosed?

Paul: Typically, two years from your diagnosis. There are exceptions of those rules that could extend that period of time. But the general rule of thumb is get it filed within two years from the date of your diagnosis and you will not have any problems. Our courts have very little discretion. If you file it beyond the two years, if the court thinks that there’s no reasonable excuse for not filing it after the two-year from diagnosis, the court has zero discretion and has to dismiss your case. So don’t get close to that to that two-year date. Talk to your lawyer immediately, and hopefully the lawyer will be able to file a lawsuit very, very quickly.

John: All right, well that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks, John.

Get More Information About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure Illnesses

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley and Kelley at Satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

A Permanent Way to Dispose of Asbestos is to Turn It Into Something Else

After asbestos is removed from a home, factory, or office building, it could be safely contained and properly disposed of at a landfill that can safely contain this toxic substance. But that only moves the asbestos from one place to another. If something goes wrong at the landfill or someone digs into it, these cancer-causing fibers could be released again into the air or water. What might be a way to permanently end the threat of asbestos waste?

There’s More Asbestos Waste Than Can Be Safely Landfilled

The proper disposal of asbestos is becoming more of an issue in Europe, according to the BBC. It’s estimated that about 200 million tons of asbestos were produced globally until about 2010 (but asbestos is still being mined, and products containing it continue to be sold).

About half of that asbestos may be in Europe, with six million tons in the United Kingdom and about 30 million tons in the US, either still in buildings or in landfills.

At least 230,000 tons of asbestos-containing waste go into landfills annually in England. More than 1.2 million tons of asbestos waste was landfilled in Australia from 2022 to 2023. By one estimate it may take at least another 25 years for all of Europe’s asbestos to end up in landfills.

Poland is an example of a country trying to properly dispose of asbestos-containing products because of their lack of capacity. Their national asbestos abatement program started in 2002 after an estimated two million tons of asbestos fibers were imported into the country and ended up in about 15.5 million tons of products.

Under Polish rules, all such waste is to be buried in landfills capable of handling hazardous waste. It’s wrapped in plastic foil, placed in special pits with strengthened sides, and topped with six feet of soil. The Polish government found they would need 84 such landfills to deal with their asbestos. By 2022, there were 59 asbestos landfills, and only 31 were available for use.

If Asbestos is Changed to Something Safe, It Need Not Be Landfilled

Instead of landfilling asbestos containing-products, a group of companies have developed ways to make them non-toxic (or “denaturing” asbestos) and safe to re-use in other products. Those ways include heat, microwaving it, or changing it with chemicals and encapsulating in another material (such as glass).

  • In Rotterdam, the Netherlands, an industrial plant owned by Asbeter takes asbestos cement sheets, wets and shreds them. They create a slurry by milling and heating these sheets to 212 degrees and then exposing them to an alkaline solution. In chemistry, pH is a scale of how acid or base a substance is. Something that’s alkaline is more base and less acidic. The process turns asbestos fiber and the cement into a non-toxic material, calcium silicate hydrate, which can be used in concrete
  • Thermal Recycling in Britain uses heat to physically and chemically change asbestos fibers to the point the end product isn’t asbestos. It’s called Calmag and can be used as cement to create paving stones. The company is permitted to treat 29,500 tons of asbestos annually
  • A French company, Inertam, heats asbestos to high temperatures, where it becomes a glass-like material

Other companies are working on using fungi or lichen or “activated landfills” that use fungi, bacteria, and plants that could help break down or cover asbestos products to prevent fibers from becoming airborne.

What’s the Goal?

All this research, investment, and work is to prevent the fourth wave of asbestos exposure. The waves are:

  • First: Those who worked with asbestos and created asbestos-containing products and family members who were exposed to fibers on workers’ clothes
  • Second: Those who installed asbestos-containing products and family members who were exposed to fibers on workers’ clothes
  • Third: People living or working in buildings with damaged products releasing asbestos fibers into the air
  • Fourth: People who suffer environmental exposure around landfills with fibers in the air and water

Given these landfills are often located in areas where populations generally earn less money and their property is worth less than in other parts of countries, this potential future burden would be on those least able to afford it.

Celebrities With Mesothelioma

Though mesothelioma is a relatively rare cancer, it has affected hundreds of thousands of people around the world, from all walks of life. This includes some well-known celebrities, from musicians to movie stars to athletes. Mesothelioma patients in the spotlight have shed light on the broader issue of asbestos exposure. Learning about their personal struggles can help raise awareness about the importance of mesothelioma screenings for those who have been exposed to asbestos—no matter how long ago that exposure occurred.

Steve McQueen

The original “King of Cool”, Steve McQueen was one of the most iconic movie stars of the 60s and 70s. His roles in films like The Thomas Crown Affair, The Great Escape, and The Cincinnati Kid made him one of the biggest names in Hollywood, and by 1974, he was the highest-paid actor in the world. He was also well-known for his penchant for racecars and motorcycles.

In 1979, McQueen was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. He had been exposed to asbestos extensively during his service in the U.S. Marine Corps (1947-1950), where he had been tasked with removing insulation from pipes aboard troop ships. He was likely further exposed during his career, as asbestos was commonly used to insulate movie sound stages and to fireproof protective race-driving suits and helmets. He ultimately passed away in early November of 1980, at the age of 50.

Leonard Bernstein

One of modern history’s most notable composers and conductors—and the subject of Bradley Cooper’s Oscar-buzzing 2023 biopic, Maestro—Leonard Bernstein wrote, performed, and conducted prolifically throughout his long career, with contributions including Broadway musicals like West Side Story.

When he was in his early 70s and in failing health from emphysema (linked to his lifelong heavy smoking), Bernstein was diagnosed with mesothelioma. It is unclear exactly where he was exposed to asbestos, but it is likely that his smoking and chronic lung disease may have caused his condition to develop sooner than it otherwise may have. In October 1990 he announced his retirement from conducting, and passed away from a mesothelioma-related heart attack five days later.

Stephen Jay Gould:

Stephen Jay Gould was an important paleontologist and evolutionary biologist. He wrote extensively in Natural History magazine, and contributed greatly to the field of evolutionary biology.

In July 1982, Gould was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma, linked to asbestos exposure while working at Harvard’s Museum of Comparative Zoology, which housed its specimens in asbestos-lined cabinets. Gould was told the median survival time for peritoneal mesothelioma was 8 months. Though this median seemed shockingly short, Gould delved into the statistics and medical literature, and discovered that the odds were actually in his favor to live far longer than the median survival time. In a 1985 Discover magazine column (titled “The Median Isn’t the Message”), he describes this realization, explaining that while statistical averages are often useful, they are ultimately abstractions that do not account for the varieties of human and medical experience.

After his diagnosis, Gould underwent a then-experimental multimodal mesothelioma treatment plan, consisting of multiple surgeries, radiation, and aggressive chemotherapy. Despite severe side effects, the treatment was ultimately successful: Gould went on to live another 20 years after his initial diagnosis.

Warren Zevon:


Classic rock singer, songwriter and musician Warren Zevon was the man behind iconic hits like “Keep Me in Your Heart” and “Werewolves of London”, and was known for his hard-edged but poetic style. He was a frequent guest on Late Night with David Letterman and collaborated with artists like Bruce Springsteen, The Everly Brothers, Fleetwood Mac, Jackson Browne, and Tom Petty.

In the fall of 2002, after experiencing shortness of breath and dizziness, Zevon was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma. He had likely been exposed to asbestos repeatedly throughout his life, including in the attic of his father’s carpet store, where he used to play as a child, and while performing around the country in venues with asbestos-coated ceiling pipes. His band’s drummer would often bang on the pipes during sets, sending asbestos particles into the air.

Zevon ultimately refused aggressive treatment, and instead focused his energies on making a final album, The Wind, which deals with illness and the end of life bravely and candidly. On October 30, 2002, Zevon debuted several songs from The Wind on a special hour-long episode of the Late Show with David Letterman. When asked if he had learned anything about life and death from his mesothelioma journey, Zevon famously replied that people should “enjoy every sandwich.” He passed away on September 7th, 2003, two weeks after The Wind was publicly released.

Ed Lauter:

Esteemed character actor Ed Lauter was known largely for playing authority figures, military men, and edgy bad guys during his four-decade film and television career, including roles in The Longest Yard, Mulholland Falls, Cujo, Born on the Fourth of July, and The Artist.

In June 2013, Lauter was diagnosed with mesothelioma, and passed away soon thereafter in October 2013 (shortly before his 75th birthday). Lauter had been exposed to asbestos extensively while working at various Los Angeles movie studios and sets. After his death, his family filed a lawsuit against many big-name plaintiffs, including CBS, Ford, GE, Union Carbide, and Viacom, among others, alleging that they knowingly exposed Lauter (and many of his colleagues) to asbestos on set. The lawsuit is still pending. In the meantime, Lauter’s widow Mia set up the Ed Lauter Foundation, which offers scholarships to aspiring actors.

Merlin Olson

Merlin Olson was a record-breaking defensive tackle with the LA Rams who went on to have a successful TV sports commentary and acting career, ultimately starring in the NBC drama, Father Murphy, among other roles.  

In 2009, Olson was diagnosed with peritoneal mesothelioma. He had been exposed to asbestos repeatedly while working construction jobs during his Utah youth, and then during his career in sports and television. Later that year, while undergoing extensive chemotherapy, Olson filed a lawsuit against 25 defendants (including NBC, Fox, Georgia Pacific, and Sherwin Williams) for exposing him to asbestos over the course of his lifetime. He ultimately passed away in March 2010, at the age of 69.

Are you or a loved one looking for more information about mesothelioma? Call (855) 385-9532 to learn more.