Secondary Exposure to Asbestos: The Primary Cause of Mesothelioma in Women

Mesothelioma is often thought of as a male disease; when most people think of the average mesothelioma patient, they think of a man. This is supported to some extent by the numbers. It is, in fact, true that mesothelioma tends to affect men more than women, by a sizable margin: over 75% of mesothelioma patients are male.

This gender disparity in mesothelioma has often been linked to the primary cause of mesothelioma, which is exposure to asbestos fibers. Asbestos exposure has most commonly, widely and consistently occurred in the workplace, and specifically in traditionally male-dominated workplaces. To fully explain this phenomenon, there are some important things you need to know about this more common form of asbestos exposure, usually referred to as “primary exposure.”

What is Primary Asbestos Exposure?

Primary asbestos exposure is direct exposure to asbestos, which often occurred in the workplace.

Asbestos is a mineral found in many parts of the world. It is especially heat-resistant and is a very effective fire-suppressant, which led to its widespread use as insulation in many fields–especially in mechanical, shipyard, industrial, aeronautic, military, and construction applications.

Asbestos is composed of tiny, microscopic fibers, which are so small that they are individually invisible to the naked eye. The fibers naturally form in bundles, which remain intact unless disturbed. However, if disturbed (as they are in many professional applications of asbestos), the fibers shake loose from the bundles and get sent up into the air.

Those loose, airborne fibers are often inhaled by people handling the asbestos, or people working nearby. Inhaled asbestos fibers can travel to the lungs as well as the pleura, a thin membrane of tissue that covers the lungs. These fibers cannot be broken down or removed by the body, and often lodge in the tissue of the affected organ or tissue lining. Asbestos fibers are harmful to lung and pleural cells, and pleural injury and gene mutation caused by lodged asbestos fibers can lead to pleural mesothelioma over time. Asbestos can also cause other forms of lung cancer, as well as lung scarring (asbestosis).

In addition, asbestos fibers can also travel to, lodge within, and affect other protective tissue linings around the heart and the abdominal organs, leading to pericardial mesothelioma (and associated cancers and heart diseases), and peritoneal mesothelioma (and associated cancers and diseases of the abdominal organs).

Who is at risk for mesothelioma via primary exposure to asbestos?

Out of the total population, there is a relatively small number of people who have been exposed to asbestos in a high enough concentration for a long enough time for mesothelioma to form.

Since the late 1970s, when it became clear that asbestos exposure is directly linked to mesothelioma and associated diseases, asbestos has largely been discontinued in many of the industries in which it was once widely used. This change began in the late 1970s but was not complete for many years. Indeed, asbestos is still not entirely absent from certain fields, though it is handled with increased safety regulations.

Most people who develop mesothelioma are able to trace their asbestos exposure to the workplace, usually workplaces in the fields mentioned above (i.e., shipyards construction, industrial, manufacturing, or military) that widely utilized asbestos before restrictions were put in place in the late 1970s.

Fields in which extensive asbestos exposure leading to mesothelioma were most common include:

  • Firefighting
  • Work related to the merchant marines
  • Demolition
  • Drywall work and drywall removal
  • General construction
  • Lathing (making frameworks for buildings)
  • Bricklaying and Kiln work
  • Plasterwork
  • Mining (especially asbestos-related or asbestos-adjacent mining)
  • Steelwork (especially in steel mills)
  • Papermill work
  • Power plant work
  • Foundry work
  • Naval yard work
  • Millwrighting (repair for industrial machinery)
  • Boilermaking, boiler engineering, and boiler repair
  • Automotive engineering, production, or repair
  • Aircraft engineering, production, or repair
  • Manufacturing of products containing asbestos
  • Electrical work and electrical repair
  • Chemical work (especially in chemical plants)
  • Oil work (especially in oil fields and refineries)
  • Plumbing and pipefitting

During the time that most dangerous asbestos exposure occurred, these fields were male-dominated, and the jobs which would put a worker at risk of primary asbestos exposure were largely if not entirely held by men. As a result, there has been a general disparity in mesothelioma cases, with more men than women developing mesothelioma.

What is secondary asbestos exposure?

While primary asbestos exposure accounts for around ¾ of all mesothelioma cases, that still leaves a significant percentage of mesothelioma cases unlinked to primary exposure. These cases were almost all the result of secondary asbestos exposure, and account for nearly all of the known cases of mesothelioma in women.

Those subject to secondary exposure did not work in the fields where primary asbestos exposure was most common. Rather, they were often associated with asbestos in less direct–but nonetheless very dangerous–ways. These included:

  • Secondary asbestos exposure in the home via primary asbestos workers: Many victims of secondary asbestos exposure were family members living in the same homes as the workers who were victims of primary asbestos exposure. This is sometimes referred to as “take-home asbestos exposure.”

Since asbestos fibers are jagged, the edges snag and can attach easily to surfaces on a worker’s person, whether that surface is an item of clothing (shoes, uniforms, clothes, and/or protective gear) or a part of the body (i.e., skin or hair). Many men who were primarily exposed to asbestos at work often came home with asbestos fibers attached to them. In doing so, they unknowingly exposed the other members of their household to asbestos indirectly, or via “secondary exposure”. The asbestos fibers attached to the workers were shaken loose and cast into the air, where they could then be inhaled or swallowed by other people in their households, especially those who handled he workers’ clothing.

Of course, the people who were most often responsible for washing and maintaining the work clothes of affected workers were women: whether they were wives, mothers, or other female family members.

  • Secondary asbestos exposure in the home via household products and construction: Another means of secondary exposure is through asbestos products that were used in home construction, and the disturbance of asbestos fibers via household renovations and construction projects.

aAsbestos was very widely used in home construction, and many products commonly used in home construction contained asbestos. Homes built before the 1980s likely contained (or still contain) asbestos. Spray-on asbestos was widespread, which was especially dangerous since it sent many asbestos fibers up into the air at once. A number of other household construction products also contained asbestos, including:

  • Textured paint
  • Siding/undersheeting
  • Insulation (especially around boilers and steam pipes)
  • Vermiculite (which was often contaminated with asbestos)
  • Roofing felt used under shingles
  • Vinyl floor tiles

            Asbestos fibers were frequently disturbed and sent into the air during home renovations, repairs, and general construction. Sometimes, all it took was drilling into drywall or gathering up insulation to replace. Secondary asbestos exposure through home construction often affected women who identified as homemakers and housewives, as they would be home overseeing or even participating in the repairs or renovations.

  • Secondary asbestos exposure via non-conventional workplace: Like most homes built before the 1980s, most larger public use buildings–especially governmental agency buildings, public hospitals, nursing homes, and schools–were built with products containing asbestos. When construction, repairs, and even some forms of dusting were done on these buildings, those who were required to remain inside–namely, teachers and school workers, healthcare workers, and people working in social services–were exposed to the resultant asbestos fibers sent into the air.

This form of asbestos exposure, which is considered secondary exposure, most commonly affected women. Just as the primary exposure fields were mostly male-dominated, the fields of education, public healthcare, and social services were mostly female-dominated.

In addition, some women were subject to secondary workplace exposure because they worked in factories that handled products containing asbestos, or because they worked adjacent to primary asbestos exposure (i.e., at the lunch truck). Though these occupations are not considered primary forms of asbestos exposure, they resulted in extensive secondary exposure, often among women.

  • Secondary asbestos exposure via environment: A smaller but still notable number of people endured secondhand exposure to asbestos through asbestos contamination of the environment where they lived. This usually occurred when the person lived close to an industrial facility, factory, oil field, or deposit where asbestos was being mined, refined, or utilized. This sort of environmental contamination can result in secondary asbestos exposure through the air, as well as through food and water.

Are you or a loved one concerned about secondary asbestos exposure and mesothelioma risk? Call us toll-free at 855-385-9532 or fill out our contact form to schedule a free consultation.

Common Traits of Mesothelioma Patients Who Beat Their Prognosis

One of the most overwhelming and potentially discouraging things about a mesothelioma diagnosis is the outlook moving forward. Many mesothelioma patients are given a rather daunting prognosis–that is, a projection of how the disease is likely to progress–especially when it comes to projected survival rates and lifespans.

What is the average prognosis of someone with mesothelioma?

When considering average prognoses, we have to remember that averages are not absolutes. Averages are just that: average, or the most common experience among a wide range of experiences. Just because an experience is average doesn’t mean that it will directly correspond to or a define each particular individual’s experience. 

The average mesothelioma prognosis is a little more than one year. This time frame is based on the average survival rates from all past mesothelioma cases, taking into account potentially prognosis-improving new therapies.

However, when you get more specific, average prognoses vary depending on a number of factors, including:

  • Type of Mesothelioma: Different types of mesothelioma have different average prognoses. While pleural mesothelioma, which affects the lining of the lungs, has an average prognosis of 6-12 months, peritoneal mesothelioma, which affects the lining of the abdomen, has an average prognosis of around 2-5 years.
  • Cell Type: Just like there are different types of mesothelioma based on where the cancer develops, there are also different types of mesothelioma based on what types of cancer cells compose the tumor. There are three major types of mesothelioma in terms of composition of cancer cells: epithelioid, which is the most common, sarcomatoid, which is less common, and biphasic, which is a mix of epithelioid and sarcomatoid.

Generally, patients with epithelioid mesothelioma have better prognoses, as these cells are less aggressive, spread slower, and respond better to treatment. Patients with sarcomatoid tend to have worse prognoses, as these cells are more aggressive, faster spreading, and less responsive to treatment. When it comes to biphasic mesothelioma patients, prognosis will depend on relative percentages of epithelioid and sarcomatoid cells–with higher percentages of epithelioid cells meaning better prognoses.

  • Stage of Cancer at Diagnosis: Cancer is diagnosed and described in terms of TNM stages, which describe the tumor location, lymph node involvement, and metastasis (or spread). Generally, the higher the stage, the more advanced the disease. Patients whose mesothelioma was diagnosed while still in early stages tend to have better prognoses, while patients with later-stage diagnoses tend to have worse prognoses.

If mesothelioma is diagnosed at Stage 1 or Stage 2, there are more treatment options, and the prognosis is therefore usually better (on average, 21 months or longer for Stage 1 diagnoses, and 19 months or longer for Stage 2 diagnoses). However, if the mesothelioma has already begun to spread, as in Stage 3 diagnoses, or has already spread to distant parts of the body, as in Stage 4 diagnoses, average prognoses are more limited (around 16 months and 12 months, respectively).

  • Age: In cases of mesothelioma, as with most types of cancer, the younger a patient is, the better their prognosis tends to be. Patients who are 75 and older tend to have a shorter prognosis than those who are 50 years and younger at the time of diagnosis. Patients under 50 tend to have much better prognoses than older patients: one study suggested that patients diagnosed with mesothelioma at age 44 or younger lived almost six times as long as those diagnosed at 75 or older.
  • Gender: Generally, women tend to have better average mesothelioma prognoses than men. It is not fully understood why, but one study suggested that this difference is quite significant, showing among its subjects that women lived eight months longer than men with mesothelioma  on average.
  • Overall Health: Fighting cancer is very taxing on the body, and patients in poorer health may have fewer viable treatment options than those in better health. As a result, those who were already in poor health or had pre-existing conditions when they got their mesothelioma diagnosis may have worse prognoses than those who are diagnosed while in otherwise good health.
  • Blood Chemistry: Some characteristics of a mesothelioma patient’s blood may impact their mesothelioma prognosis. Certain blood-related biological characteristics, such as elevated white blood cell counts, high platelet counts, and low hemoglobin levels, tend to worsen

What do people who beat their prognoses have in common?

Now that we have a sense of what an average mesothelioma prognosis looks like, there’s some better news: mesothelioma patients sometimes beat their prognoses, and more and more mesothelioma patients are joining their ranks as time and medical science progress onward.

New treatments and therapies are making it possible for some people to outlive their prognoses by years, and to improve their quality of life both during and after treatment.

While there is no “magic bullet”, it is worth noting that many of the mesothelioma patients who have beaten their prognoses and surpassed the expectations of their doctors have several things in common. In addition to pursuing the course of treatment ultimately recommended by their medical team, mesothelioma patients who beat the odds often utilized the following:

  • Getting a Second Opinion: As is the case for all cancers and serious conditions, it is absolutely worth it to get a second opinion after your first mesothelioma diagnosis. Don’t worry about hurting your doctor’s feelings or insulting them: no credible doctor will be offended if you seek out the opinion of a second doctor, as this is considered standard in the field.

Second opinions are so important because they give you access to more information, and potentially more options. Doctors are still human, and their opinions are subject to human error. A second opinion may reveal that your mesothelioma is not as advanced as the first doctor believed. Alternatively, your first doctor may not have offered certain treatments if they believed the risks outweighed the benefits. A second doctor may disagree, and help you get a better sense of what your treatment options actually are.

Many mesothelioma patients who beat their prognoses sought out second opinions, and in doing so learned important information that helped improve their odds.

  • Finding a Mesothelioma Specialist or Specialist Cancer Center: Once you have your diagnosis, you should absolutely try to find a mesothelioma specialist or s cancer center that specializes in treating your specific type of mesothelioma. Mesothelioma is a relatively rare cancer, and general oncologists may not have the knowledge or tools to provide you with the best treatments possible.

Many mesothlioma patients who beat their prognoses sought out and received care from top mesothelioma experts or highly rated mesothelioma treatment and research hospitals. These specialists and centers/hospitals will have access to the latest information and the most cutting-edge treatments in order to give you the best shot at beating your prognosis.

  • Experimental Treatments and Therapies: Many prognosis-beating mesothelioma patients utilized one or more of the standard, first-line mesothelioma treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation). Many also utilized experimental treatments, which are not considered “first-line” for several reasons, but which may work wonders on individual cases of mesothelioma. These include:
  1. Immunotherapy: Immonotherapy is a cancer treatment that uses the patient’s immune system to fight cancer in a targeted way. One of the most common immunotherapies for pleural mesothelioma is a combination of Opdivo (nivolumab) and Yervoy (ipilimumab). Another immunotherapy being used to treat mesothelioma is CAR T-cell therapy, which reprograms t-cells to target and attack mesothelin (a protein produced by mesothelioma cancer cells), often used in combination with Keytruda (pembrolizumab), an immunotherapy drug similar to Opdivo.
  • Photodynamic Therapy (PDT): Often used in combination with other treatment methods, PDT uses light to kill cancerous cells. It works by giving the patient a photosensitizing drug that collects in cancer cells but not healthy cells, making the cancer cells vulnerable to light of specific wavelengths. Fiberoptic cables are then placed in the body to focus light in that wavelength onto the tumor, producing a toxic oxygen molecule that kills the cancer cells.
  • Angiogenesis: Since cancer cells rely on a regular supply of blood, and must develop a network of adjacent capillaries and larger blood vesels in order to get enough blood (a process which is called “angiogenesis”). There is currently extensive research being done on how to slow down, reduce, or stop angiogenesis in order to cut off the tumor’s blood supply and starve cancer cells to death.
  • Clinical Trials: Clinical trials are a huge boon to many mesothelioma patients, and have been shown to be helpful in a sizable amount of cases where mesothelioma patients beat their prognoses. These trials, which may give patients access to otherwise unavailable treatment options, were the lynchpin for a variety of prognosis-beating mesothelioma patients. One of the reasons why it is important to find a mesothelioma specialist or specialist treatment center is their ability to connect patients with ongoing clinical trials, and potentially with prognosis-beating treatments.
  • Nutrition: Whether or not you have mesothelioma, nutrition is one of the key building blocks of health and improved health outcomes, especially when it comes to medical prognoses. Studies have shown that nutrition may help patients before, during, and after their treatment for mesothelioma. While there is no magic bullet food you can eat or not eat to shrink a tumor, maintaining a nutritious diet supports mesothelioma treatments and can therefore improve outcomes. Many cancer treatment centers and mesothelioma specialists will be able to refer mesothelioma patients to an oncology nutiritionist who can help patients make changes to their diet to facilitate treatment.

The National Cancer Institute’s Exceptional Responder’s Initiative (ERI), which studies patients who outlive their initial life expectancies, found that 50% of prognosis-beating cancer patients changed their diet after recieving a cancer diagnosis, mostly by decreasing red meat and carbohydrates and increasing fruits and vegetables.

  • Exercise: While it may be difficult to maintain an exercise regimen during mesothelioma treatment, fitness training seems to be effective in helping mesothelioma patients improve their prognoses. Research shows that exercise like resistance training and aerobics may help reduce fatigue during treatment, reduce the risk of cancer returning after treatment, and improve life expectancy. 33% of ERIs interviewed by the National Cancer Institute started exercise programs or increased their exercise levels upon diagnosis.
  • Complementary/Alternative Therapies and Supplements: Both complementary and alternative medicine and vitamin or mineral supplements may improve a mesothelioma prognosis in some circumstances. They may also reduce mesothelioma and treatment symptoms and improve overall quality of life. Alternative therapies like acupuncture, yoga, meditation, massage, and biofeedback are widely reported among patients who beat their mesothelioma diagnoses, with 60% of ERIs reporting that they utilized at least one of these therapies. Supplements like calcium, folic acid, magnesium, beta-carotene, amino acids, magnesium, protein, selenium, and vitamins A, B12, D and E can help ensure mesothelioma patients are getting everything their bodies need to put up the best fight possible. Over 50% of ERIs reported that they took supplements of some sort during their cancer treatment.
  • Community Support: One of the most essential boons for mesothelioma patients in improving their prognoses is spiritual/communal strength and support.  A diagnosis like mesothelioma can be isolating and alienating for patients, which means it’s more important than ever to strengthen and rely on community support networks to remind them that they are not alone.

Many mesothelioma patients who beat their prognosis reported that their strong network of support was pivotal in improving their outcomes. There was also a high reported rate of participation in support groups, where patients were able to touch with other people with similar prognoses. In addition, professionals like counselors/therapists and mesothelioma patient advocates can be enormously important resources for patients looking to improve their odds and their quality of life.

Are you a mesothelioma patient or loved one looking for more information? Call us toll-free at 855-385-9532 or fill out our contact form to schedule a free consultation.

Coal Mining Equipment and Mesothelioma (Podcast)

In this podcast, Paul Kelley from the Personal Injury Law Firm, Satterley & Kelley PLLC, talks about the link between coal mining equipment and mesothelioma. He explains what people should do if they were exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma.

John Maher: Hi, I’m John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky Personal Injury Law Firm, Satterley & Kelley PLLC, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today we’re talking about coal mining equipment and mesothelioma. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Good morning, John. How are you doing today?

How Were Coal Miners Exposed to Asbestos?

John: Good, thanks. So Paul, I’ve heard of asbestos mining, but how could coal miners be exposed to asbestos?

Paul: John, coal miners can be exposed to asbestos in a variety of ways. And it’s not really just the miners, it’s others that work in coal mines. But there’s really two ways that folks that work in coal mines can get exposed to asbestos. One, unfortunately, is through naturally growing or naturally occurring asbestos that is located in the mines where coal is mined. Both coal and asbestos are naturally occurring products, they’re both mined, and frequently they’re found in some of the same places. So coal miners who actually mine coal sometimes will encounter asbestos, unknowingly, of course, but that’s certainly one way they can be exposed.

The other way that folks are exposed to asbestos in coal mines has to do with the equipment that’s used, and we’ll talk about that in a little further detail. But all this equipment, whether it’s for a surface mine that’s, of course, above ground, or an underground mine, all of the equipment at one point in time contained asbestos products. Those products were brakes to stop the machines. Those products were packing material, which we could talk about in a little further detail. There was gasket material that was located on these machines. And it wasn’t just a little bit, it was a lot.

Asbestos in Explosion-Proof Boxes in Mining Equipment

Paul: Underground coal mines were particularly dangerous because you have a real problem with explosions occurring in those mines. They’re typically what’s called gassy mines. And any sort of spark could cause a catastrophic explosion, which would kill numerous people and damage the mine, and be catastrophic on numerous levels. So one of the things that the equipment had to do was it had to be explosion proof. But the problem is all that equipment is electrical, and it can’t be gas fueled, for obvious reasons, it was electrical. Electrical is certainly safer in an underground mine, but you’re still at high risk for an explosion that’s caused by some sort of spark occurring.

So all of these pieces of equipment that mined, and the kinds of equipment we’re talking about are the shuttle cars that shuttle coal back and forth from the point of retrieval to the surface of the mine, the scrapers that actually extracted the coal, the long wall equipment, which helped solidify the walls and the ceilings or the high points of the mine. All of that equipment was electrical and had electrical cables that ran sometimes to other equipment outside the mine. And then, of course, there were wires and cables that were all connected throughout the machine.

So there was something in those machines called explosion proof boxes. And those explosion proof boxes are essentially where the electrical connections occurred. And all those boxes at one point in time, and when I say one point in time I mean probably prior to 1990, all those boxes contained asbestos, asbestos packing. And they were packed airtight so that nothing could come in from the outside, nothing from the inside could get out. And the purpose of this packing essentially was to retain heat because asbestos has a very high heat retention quality. And that if there was a spark, some sort of electrical occurrence that happened inside that box, the packing would essentially prevent anything from getting outside, anything from causing an ignition outside the mine.

The problem is that the asbestos packing was extremely deadly itself. It was a rope packing material. It was typically manufactured by a company called Johns Manville back in the seventies and eighties. And it was not a product where the asbestos was really encapsulated or the fibers were kept in. In fact, Johns Manville acknowledged that and told the mining equipment suppliers that it doesn’t bind and contain the fibers. So people who handle this material can be exposed to a considerable amount of asbestos.

Asbestos Exposure From Brakes on Mining Equipment

Paul: And then the brakes on these machines, all of the brakes through the mid-1980s contain asbestos. These machines are many thousands of pounds. They are going uphill frequently at steep inclines. They have to change those brakes frequently. And for many years, those brakes contained asbestos and people that worked on them who both took out the old, put in the new, would be exposed to asbestos from working on those products.

And I’m sure that this won’t come to any great surprise to you, but you can’t have downtime in a mine. So it is critical that when a machine needs normal maintenance or when a machine breaks down, it was all hands on deck and they had to get the machines fixed as soon as possible, so that they don’t run the risk of having any downtime. And, as you know, time is money and coal companies operate to essentially earn a profit. And so it was very important to make sure that this equipment ran properly. And it was equally important that it was safe from the standpoint of no ignition. But, unfortunately, it wasn’t safe to the people who worked on these machines.

Which Coal Miners Were the Most Likely to Be Exposed to Asbestos?

John: Right, and now you said that the coal miners have a lot of different jobs, a lot of different jobs of people working or in a coal mine. What are some of the job classifications of coal miners who were the most likely to be exposed to asbestos?

Paul: The two most likely exposed are going to be the mechanics and the electricians. The mechanics did all of the typical kind of work on these machines. They certainly did the brake work. If a belt needed changing, any type of work.

But the electricians were the ones that were dealing with the electrical connections and dealing with this packing material. The electricians, of course, had to be highly skilled workers. They had to be certified. They had to be certified by what’s called MSHA, the Bureau of Mines. They had to be knowledgeable electricians. And so electricians were the ones that broke into those explosion proof boxes. They took the packing out, they unconnected or disconnected the wires, they made the new connections, they replaced all the packing. They either put the old back in or put brand new back in.

But, certainly, anyone who worked alongside those employees were also going to be exposed. I mean, the coal operators themselves, the miners that were extracting the coal, the folks who drove the shuttle cars back and forth, the folks who handled long walls. I mean, in an underground mine, you’re in a very tight space. And although these mines were supposed to have pretty good airflow and be well ventilated, they were not for something like asbestos. They were not for something like coal either. They were ventilated for the purposes of keeping airflow to, again, help reduce the likelihood of an explosion.

But in terms of protecting folks from occupational disease, the mines were not really all that well ventilated and protective of dust exposure. So, again, your mechanics and your electricians, they’re going to bear the brunt of it, but anyone that works in an underground mine is going to have significant exposure because it’s just simply unavoidable.

Coal Mines With Documented Asbestos Exposure

John: Right. So are there specific mines where asbestos exposure has been particularly documented?

Paul: Well, in Kentucky, I would say every mine. We have dealt with Peabody Coal Company in western Kentucky. We’ve dealt with Smith Coal Company, which is also in Western Kentucky. Those are surface mines. The underground mines in eastern Kentucky, which is predominantly what there was in Eastern Kentucky. I mean, Scott’s Branch Mine is a mine that had kinds of equipment. But, essentially, if someone worked in an underground coal mine prior to, I would say, probably 1995, maybe even 2000, more than likely there was equipment in those mines that contained the asbestos products that we’re talking about.

And I think it’s still possible today that some is out there. They probably aren’t using brand new asbestos anymore, but certainly old asbestos products are probably still hanging around out there. And anytime somebody comes into contact with a brake or comes into contact with packing material, they need to be especially cautious and inquisitive. What is this? What is it that we’re working on?

But because of the type of work that was being done, because of the particular risk associated with those mines, I can’t imagine that there were many mines anywhere, Kentucky, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, the places where coal was historically mined in this country, I can’t imagine there were any mines that didn’t have at least some of this equipment that contained asbestos.

Now, John, I would note that there were other materials that were available prior to the nineties that didn’t contain asbestos. There was rubber packing, accomplishing the same goal, preventing ignition and explosion, that didn’t contain asbestos. That was available, but it frequently was not used, probably for cost purposes. Certainly there were non-asbestos brakes that were available, but most companies, again, used asbestos brakes.

And typically what I’ve heard is, well, it was safer to use the asbestos products at the time because they were a known quantity. We know that they would stop the machines in the case of the brakes. With respect to the packing, it was a known quantity. We knew that it would stop ignitions from occurring. But the reality was, they designed those machines for asbestos products and changing the design for another non asbestos product was time consuming, it was costly. And most of these companies, they weren’t going to have to worry about it for 20 or 30 years because that’s how long it takes people to get sick from asbestos exposure.

Illnesses From Asbestos Versus Coal Dust

John: Right. Now, as we know, coal mining is a dangerous job and there’s other diseases that people can get from working in coal mines. Is it possible to tell if someone is sick from asbestos exposure versus exposure to something else like coal dust?

Paul: Yeah, it can be difficult in the short run, but certainly in the long run it would be fairly easy to make that distinction. So, I’m sure you’ve heard of black lung disease, that’s the coal disease. It’s called pneumoconiosis, and it’s a terrible disease. I mean, here in Kentucky, so many people have been afflicted with black lung and it can be fatal. But it’s not a cancer, it is more of a nonmalignant scarring of the lungs. And there are ways that a pulmonologist can evaluate someone and make a determination as to whether they suffer from black lung disease.

Now, with respect to asbestos, there’s really two types of asbestos lung diseases. There’s asbestosis, which is also a non-malignant lung disease. It also is a scarring of the lungs, but it presents differently on a chest x-ray and a CT scan so that doctors can make a determination this is asbestosis versus black lung.

The other disease, lung disease from asbestos exposure is, of course, mesothelioma, which is a cancer, not of the lung, but of the lining of the lung. It’s going to produce far different symptoms than black lung would. It will even produce far different symptoms than what asbestosis would. Because mesothelioma forms in the chest, typically, the early symptoms that we hear are not just breathing problems, which is what you get with black lung or what you get with asbestosis, but severe chest pain because it’s a tumor growing in your chest, severe shortness of breath. They’ll start to experience pain in other parts of their body, whether it’s chest pain, sometimes it’s back pain, depending on the size of the tumor. So when somebody works in a coal mine and they start experiencing lung problems, I think the first inclination is, well, gosh, I probably have some level of black lung.

Black Lung Versus Asbestos-Related Diseases

John: Sure.

Paul: And that could very well be true. But it’s critical, it’s critical when those symptoms start to occur, it’s critical for the former coal mining worker to tell their doctors everything that they did. And to tell them, look, coal, big problem, of course, had lots of exposure to coal dust. But I probably had some exposure to asbestos, if not a lot of exposure to asbestos. And all options need to be, or all possibilities need to be explored.

The diseases, from a symptoms standpoint, they do present similarly. But from a medical standpoint, once the doctors get in and conduct their evaluation, they figure it out pretty quickly. This is not black lung, but this is some sort of asbestos disease. But, unfortunately, it’s two terrible things that these brave coal miners and coal mine employees were exposed to.

What to Do If You Got Mesothelioma From a Coal Mine

John: Right. So what should someone do if they believe that they got mesothelioma from working in a coal mine?

Paul: Sure. So what we always tell everybody is obviously your medical treatment is always the most critical part. Early detection is absolutely critical to the best outcome possible. Unfortunately, mesothelioma carries a very dire outcome, and the prognosis for most people is that they pass away from the disease within 12 to 18 months. However, the treatments are getting better and have gotten significantly better over the last 15 or 20 years. And we’re seeing people live for a very long time, five years, 10 years, 15 years, under the right circumstances. So get your medical care established first, that’s always important.

But there are parties out there that are responsible for causing you this disease. Most of the manufacturers of the equipment that I talked about, the shuttle cars and the scrapers and the long wall equipment, I mean all of that equipment, those manufacturers are still out there. Those manufacturers were well aware of what they were putting in these machines, that they were specifying asbestos containing products.

And it would be important to consult with a lawyer to talk about your options. It would also be important to collect as much information as you can concerning the type of exposure that you had. Maybe you don’t remember the manufacturers of the machines that you worked on, but maybe your former coworker does. So it’s critical to conduct some sort of investigation on your own to try to figure out what equipment was used, refresh your recollection, but that’s what we do.

And I remember five years ago, and I’m going to tell on myself a little bit. Five years ago, I didn’t know anything about coal mines and asbestos exposure in coal mines. I thought that it was all from the naturally occurring deposits that might have been in the mines where the coal was found and extracted. But the first case that we had that came in four or five years ago, we got into it a little bit. And I learned an awful lot about how severe the risk was from the exposure to the equipment that we’ve talked about. And since that time, cases that, quite frankly, I might have turned away 4, 5, 6, 10 years ago, now I know exactly where the exposure came from, and we can help you figure that out.

And so my recommendation is, and always is, get your medical plan squared away, but come talk to us, come talk to another lawyer that handles these cases, because we can help. And we can help figure out your exposures and we can help get compensation for you and your family in what, quite frankly, is the most significant time of need that you probably have ever had and ever will have.

Contact the Law Firm of Satterley & Kelley for Help

John: All right. Well that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks John, I appreciate it.

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & and Kelley PLLC at satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

Power Plants and Mesothelioma (Podcast)

In this podcast, Paul Kelley, a  partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm Satterley & Kelley, talks about asbestos-exposure in power plants. He explains what people should do if they believe that they have developed mesothelioma due to working in a power plant.

John Maher: Hi. I’m John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm Satterley & Kelley, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today, we’re talking about power plants and mesothelioma. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hi, John. How are you doing this morning?

Where Was Asbestos Used in Power Plants?

John: Good. Thanks. Paul, where has asbestos historically been used in power plants?

Paul: Well, the main areas where power plants had asbestos, and I’m predominantly talking before 1990, mid-’80s, is going to be in three ways. One is going to be the boilers that were located at these steam generation power plants, the turbine generators and also all the hot steam lines that were located throughout the plant. Typically, these things were covered with thermal insulation. Thermal insulation contained asbestos certainly before 1972, but they contain asbestos all the way into the ’80s. In fact, you could go to a lot of these power plants that still exist today and still find it at least wrapping the steam lines.

Just a little bit of information on power plants, so the old coal fired power plants, they had a boiler that was fueled by coal. The boiler reached 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit. It heated water into steam, and then the steam was used to power the turbine, and then the turbine spun and it generated electricity, and that’s how we got electricity. The boilers were typically stories tall, I mean seven, eight, 10 stories, so imagine a 10-story apartment building. That’s how big these boilers were. The boilers generated extreme amounts of heat, a couple thousand degrees up to.

For safety purposes as well as for purposes to retain the heat, they had to be covered with thermal insulation. They had to be covered with other types of asbestos-containing products, sometimes of liquid, powdery material that, when applied with water, it would go around and encase the boiler, and then the same thing with the turbine. The turbine also needed to retain heat and, also for safety purposes, so that people didn’t touch it and burn themselves, the turbines were covered with asbestos, usually an asbestos blanket, except a lot of blankets because these turbines are huge.

If you imagine the boiler being 10, 12 stories tall, the turbine is probably, I don’t know, maybe a hundred feet long, not stories tall, but probably a hundred feet long or so, and so they’re covered with asbestos insulation and asbestos blankets, and then all the steam lines that connected in the building. I mean, first of all, they would heat the building, and then also the steam lines were connected to the turbines and the generator. All those steam lines were, again, extremely hot, and so they were all covered in asbestos.

People who installed the thermal insulation on these products, they were exposed. People that were around when that product was installed, they were exposed. People who were there when things were taken off, replaced, they were all exposed. You had asbestos containing gaskets all throughout the facility. All these pipes had to be connected and, again, because of the high heat that was generated, two pipes connected would have a gasket sealed in between the two pipes and, for many years, those things contain asbestos.

You probably have driven by a powerhouse before and see something called a precipitator or a smokestack and you see basically smoke coming out of it. Those things contain asbestos. They had lots of firebrick and refractory. Sometimes, the actual piece of equipment itself was made of an asbestos type concrete or cement, so unfortunately power plants were loaded with asbestos for decades, probably from the 1930s all the way to present day, unlikely the new asbestos is being installed anywhere, but certainly old asbestos.

Do Power Plants Still Have Asbestos?

John: Right. You mentioned that there still might be some steam lines and things like that that are aligned with asbestos even today. Do some power plants still use equipment in parts with asbestos in them?

Paul: Absolutely. Again, I think that, probably, the boilers and turbines, they are using other type of things, but the steam lines, if there hasn’t been a reason to remove that steam line, it still contains asbestos today. Lots of times, they just cover it with some sort of encapsulating material and hope that nobody ever really needs to work with it, but it’s still there. Gaskets are probably still around. Some of the old piping that contains asbestos is probably still around.

The good news is I wouldn’t expect anybody to be installing anything brand new that contains asbestos anymore, but, certainly, anybody that works in a powerhouse built before 1980 needs to be very cognizant of their surroundings and what materials they’re working with and around and at least be inquisitive as to whether or not that contains asbestos, because I get calls like that all the time.

I’m just amazed in 2022 that I’ll get a call from someone that says they worked in a powerhouse or some other type of place and say, “They made me remove this insulation around these pipes and then, three weeks later, OSHA came in and said, ‘Oh, that’s asbestos.’ Well, I’ve just spent two days tearing it all out.”

People need to be cognizant of their surroundings and not be afraid to ask their employer or any contractors around what’s actually here, what is this that I’m doing because there’s still a pretty good chance that they can encounter asbestos and, unfortunately, the consequences are deadly and they won’t be fully reached for another 20 or 30 years.

How People Were Exposed to Asbestos in Power Plants

John: Right, so what are some of the ways that workers at power plants could be exposed to asbestos?

Paul: Yeah. The main ways were when they installed all the equipment, and, again, this could be in the 1950s or ’60s, it could have been certainly in the 1970s, but because of the massive size of these boilers and turbines, I mean, it wasn’t a weekend job to come in and insulate these machines. I forgot to mention that lots of times inside the boilers had asbestos in them. They had firebrick and refractory. All that stuff contained asbestos.

There was always a schedule of events, and there’s the metal erection of the boiler and then, when the boiler is finally erected and put together, really the last thing that happens is the insulation comes on, and so all the people, whether they were the actual insulators themselves or whether they were people that were operating other units within the power plant that had already been put together, electricians, millwrights, plumbers, pipe fitters, I mean all those crafts are all exposed when they’re putting those materials on.

In the 1950s and ’60s, companies were not terribly safety conscious in how they applied those materials. They would just put them on and wrap them and cut all the insulation. I mean, it didn’t just come in nice, convenient sections. They would’ve to saw, cut, drill, tear. There was, quite frankly, just a massive exposure.

Did Power Plant Workers Wear Masks When Working With Asbestos?

John: They wouldn’t have been wearing masks at the time or anything either probably, right?

Paul: Most wouldn’t. I mean, we’ve represented more than 20, 25 people over the years that have worked in a powerhouse. If they were given a mask, it was a paper mask. It was not a filtered or air purifying respirator that would really protect somebody from exposure, and they rarely were told why they were given this mask. They were rarely made to wear the mask. Sometimes, they just got the mask and said, “Oh, you can wear this if you want.”

Don’t forget that, again, the temperatures in these powerhouses are extreme and wearing anything more than what you needed to was hot. We would get a lot of complaints from folks that, “Gosh, wearing a mask, or even if they had given me a respirator, I mean, it was difficult to do because it was so hot and it was so uncomfortable, and then a full respirator is a pretty bulky piece of equipment, and so it’s hard to get in small spaces in those sort of things,” but, universally, what I have been told by numerous people is, “Gosh, had they told me that this was to protect me from something that was going to cause me to get sick 20 or 30 years down the road and told me how devastating that illness could be, I most certainly would’ve worn this mask or respirator.”

Unfortunately, everybody in the chain failed. The employer failed. The manufacturer of the equipment and specified the asbestos, they failed. The companies that made the asbestos blankets and all the refractory and fire brick, they failed. The outside contractors that installed it failed. You’ve got numerous entities in the chain that all had knowledge and all had opportunities to notify the workers of the risks associated and either at least give them some knowledge on how to protect themselves or, even better, protect them as part of what they were doing, and they didn’t do it.

We get calls from people, if you can believe it, even in 2022. I get calls from people that were exposed in the 1950s that developed mesothelioma in their 80s and 90s. Even more devastating than that though is we get calls from their kids that say, “I was born in 1954. My dad worked on the construction of a powerhouse,” which by the way takes eight, nine, 10 years to fully build a powerhouse. We have some good examples here in Kentucky, but usually, given the size of the area that they’re supposed to produce electricity, there’s five or six units. What that means is there’s five or six boilers. There’s five or six turbines. There’s all that piping that’s associated with those turbines. There’s five or six precipitators.

You’ve got all this equipment, and so usually what happens is they build a unit, it takes a couple years to build that unit, and they start operating that unit, and so you’ve got a whole group of people that’s operating the power plant and then you’ve got another group of people that’s building the next unit. They usually just build one at a time. They’ll build one, work on another, finish that one and then start on the next unit. If you’ve got a powerhouse that has five units, it probably took upwards of seven or eight years to build that powerhouse and, sometimes, some of those people were there during the construction of all five of them in some capacity, so we’ll get calls from their kids that say, “I was born in 1955 and, from 1958 to 1966, my dad was involved in the construction of this particular powerhouse, and he had lots of asbestos exposures in my understanding.”

I say, “Well, of course, he did because I know that powerhouse, and I know that powerhouse had, unfortunately, a lot of asbestos in it, and then someone in their 40s or 50s is diagnosed with this devastating disease and they didn’t do anything other than be born and have the misfortune of living in a house with a family member that went to work every day to do an honest day’s work unknowingly exposed to asbestos themselves and unknowingly bringing it home to their family members, and then they develop cancer and have to deal with it.”

Sometimes, it’s hard to prove the exposure because the family member, the father or mother may be deceased, but that’s what we’re good at and that’s what we’ve been able to figure out for most of the powerhouses in Kentucky, where the exposure was, how people would’ve been exposed and, certainly, how to find people that can demonstrate that particular person’s exposure.

Family Members of Power Plant Workers Were Exposed to Asbestos

John: Right, and those family members would get that secondary exposure to asbestos because the workers, like you said, would be going to work every day at the power plant and working on this material, and then it would get on their clothes and things like that, and then they’d come home and do the laundry or shake off the dust off their clothes, and then that would get into the air inside the house, and that’s how the family members could be exposed.

Paul: Yeah, that’s absolutely right. Lots of times, the powerhouses did not give or require changing of clothes or give uniforms or anything like that, so people were just wearing their own clothes to work, and then they come home and either they wash them themselves or sometimes they would give them to their spouse or even their kids. All that dust, I mean, I hear it all the time, “We have to shake the dust out.” Back in those days, it would get into the carpet of your home. It would get into the furniture and those sorts of things.

Once asbestos is in your home, I mean, you can’t get it out. You especially can’t get it out if you don’t really know it’s there. I mean, a regular Hoover vacuum in the 1950s wasn’t going to remove asbestos from the house. All it was going to do was swirl it up and do something that we call re-entrainment, which means that dust that’s on the floor, when it’s disturbed, gets re-entrained back into the breathing zone, and so people are exposed that way and they didn’t know it.

The only way that you can really completely clean asbestos from anywhere, whether it’s your home, a power plant, industrial center, any place is to have specially made equipment that is designed to remove asbestos. No families had that kind of equipment for their house at any point in time nor should they be expected to have it because they didn’t know that that’s what they were having to deal with. The stark reality is, once it got into your home, it was there and you could continue to be exposed for years, even years after the family member that worked in the power plant no longer worked there anymore. I mean, it’s there. You’re stuck with it. You just don’t know it is the problem.

Power Plants With Documented Asbestos Exposure

John: Right. Are there specific power plants where asbestos exposure has been documented in particular?

Paul: Absolutely. As I mentioned before, we’ve represented probably 25, at least 25 people that were exposed in power plants throughout Kentucky. For the most part here in Louisville, which is where I’m at, you’ve got the Louisville Gas and Electric. It was and still is the electric company here, and there were several powerhouses. One of the biggest ones was the Cane Run plant and then also the Mill Creek plant. Cane Run construction was started in the 1950s. Mill Creek was started construction in the late 1960s, but both of those plants had all the same type of equipment that we’re talking about here. Kentucky Utilities, which is another power-generating company that operated outside of the Louisville area, it had the Ghent powerhouse, and the Ghent powerhouse, again, was being constructed in the early to late 1960s.

I can tell you stories about some of the things that we’ve uncovered about these power plants. Perhaps, that’s for another day, but what I will tell you is that, at least with respect to some of these places that they were supposed to be non-asbestos and, when it became critical from a timing standpoint that we needed to get this powerhouse built, decisions were made, “We’re going to use asbestos because it’s convenient and it’s available right now,” rather than the non-asbestos as the spec. That’s not just the power plant problem. That’s the engineer’s problem. That’s the supplier-of-the-materials’ problem. It’s not just the particular power plant at issue that creates that.

In addition to the ones I’ve talked about, I mean, the D.B. Wilson Station in Ohio County, Kentucky, which is towards western Kentucky, the E.W. Brown power plant in Harrodsburg, Kentucky, the Kenneth C. Coleman plant in Hancock County, the Paradise Steam plant in Paradise, Kentucky, you’ve probably heard of the John Prine song, Paradise, and it’s about this coal mining town in Paradise, Kentucky, the Robert Reid Power Plant, Trumbull County Generating Center, and then the Shawnee Fossil Plant in Paducah, Kentucky, so we’ve worked on cases involving these and many others and, quite frankly, none of them are unique or different. They all have the same types of asbestos materials. They all were designed in a similar way. They all were designed by companies for the most part that should have known better. They were insulated by companies that should have known better. They lack safety controls. They lack education and, as a result, many workers and several of those workers’ family members have been diagnosed and suffered from mesothelioma.

What Should You Do If You Believe You Got Mesothelioma From a Power Plant?

John: What should someone do if they believe that they got mesothelioma from working in a power plant?

Paul: Sure. Again, I think that we’ve had a lot of experience working on these kinds of cases. I would certainly welcome the opportunity to talk to you or your loved one who is diagnosed with this disease. I think we can help. I think that we know a lot of information concerning where asbestos was, when it was put in, who put it in. Certainly, from a standpoint of whether you want to pursue litigation or not, you should talk to a lawyer immediately, and you should talk to a lawyer that has experience with these places.

Certainly, what I tell everybody, and I think this is always important, when this diagnosis comes in, people are going to be confused. They’re going to be devastated. They’re probably going to get a lot of bad news about what the prognosis is in the future, and so it’s important, A, to develop your treatment plan and to figure out what doctors you’re going to go, figure out where you’re going to go to out of state for treatment, any surgeries. That’s critical, and that’s certainly what people ought to do is make sure that they have their medical situation absolutely locked in so they can do everything they can do to get better, but they need to contact a lawyer and they need to get going.

Unfortunately, time is always of the essence. There’s a statute of limitations applicable that requires people to file cases within a certain period of time. In Kentucky, it’s pretty much a year from the date of diagnosis. There are some caveats to that, but I tell everybody you can’t go wrong if you get your case filed within a year of your diagnosis. The stark reality is you don’t want to wait a year. You want to get that case filed as soon as possible both because your health may deteriorate to the point that you can’t provide information concerning your exposure. If we’re talking about people who had exposures in the ’50s or ’60s, any witnesses that are available who are probably in their 60s, 70s, 80s in age. Finding people that can provide information or corroborate your experience is important. It’s just that it’s unfortunate, and I wish that there was something that I could tell folks to say, hey, you got time and you can take your time to figure it all out, but, unfortunately, the reality is that you can’t.

When you hire us, and I tell this to every client, and it’s something that I feel very strongly about, you hire us, and you can worry about what you need to worry about. You need to worry about your health. You need to worry about getting better. You need to worry about the things that you need to do for your family and that your family needs to do for you. You let us worry about your case. There will be a time and a place where, yes, you have to worry about it yourself, and there are certain things that we need help from our clients so that we can help them, but we live with the case every day. You live with your medical treatment. You live with doing the things that you can do to get better, and let us work on your case. Let us worry about your case. I take every one of them seriously. I treat everybody like it was my own family. Because we’ve done this so many times, we just know how devastating the impact is, and one less thing to worry about is one less thing to worry about.

Contact the Law Firm of Satterley & Kelley for Help

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks, John. Have a great day.

John: For more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

Louisville Gas & Electric Mesothelioma (Podcast)

In this podcast, Paul Kelley from Satterley and Kelley talks about asbestos exposure at Louisville Gas & Electric. He explains how employees and their family members may have been exposed. Then, he outlines what to do if you have been affected.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher. I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 30 years of collective experience in handling cases involving mesothelioma and asbestos exposure. Today we’re talking about Louisville Gas & Electric, and mesothelioma. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Morning, John. How are you doing?

What Is Louisville Gas & Electric?

John: Good, thanks. Paul, what is Louisville Gas & Electric?

Paul: Well, broadly, Louisville Gas & Electric is a power company. And it pretty much covers power in the Louisville, Jefferson County area and surrounding counties, and has for quite some time. It’s owned by a bigger company now, but everybody in this area of the state recognizes Louisville Gas & Electric, or LG&E, as the company that provides us with power.

Asbestos Exposure at LG&E

John: Okay. And how is Louisville Gas & Electric related to asbestos and mesothelioma cancer cases?

Paul: Well, predominantly Louisville Gas & Electric operated power plants starting many, many years ago, close to 100 years ago. But there are two particular power plants that have been well-known sources of asbestos exposure. One is the Cane Run power plant, the other is the Mill Creek power plant. And those power plants were loaded with a variety of asbestos containing products, insulation, boilers, and turbines that were heavily insulated, and they had asbestos-containing fire brick, refractory material, and gaskets.

Asbestos gaskets were loaded all throughout the plant to connect pipes and on various pieces of equipment. Asbestos packing was stuffed into valves that were used to control the flow of steam through the facility. There was wiring cable connected to the panel boxes, various pieces of electrical equipment, the turbines, all of that wiring cable for a pretty significant period of time contained in asbestos insulation.

There were panel boxes and control boxes that were made from asbestos containing phenolic material called a bake light material that contained asbestos. And then all sorts of tanks and vessels that carried chemical processes, steam processes that were all insulated with asbestos. There was a variety of products, probably from the 40s all throughout the 1980s, and perhaps even into the 1990s that contain asbestos of those power plants.

LG&E Employee Exposure to Asbestos

John: So asbestos was used pretty extensively throughout the power plants, but how were employees at LG&E exposed to that asbestos?

Paul: Quite different ways. The Cane Run plant, for example, that consists of, I believe, six units… Now, when I say six units, that means there are six different sections of the plant that have a boiler and a turbine. The boiler essentially creates the steam, and the steam goes to the turbine, and the turbine is what essentially creates the electricity.

So there were six of those units at Cane Run. It took 15 to 20 years to build all of those various units. The boilers themselves are six, eight, maybe 10 stories tall. And then take a pretty substantial period of time to build. One way that Louisville Gas & Electric employees were exposed is during the construction of the various units. They had outside contractors that certainly constructed the facility. They had outside engineers and architects that designed the facility, but there were certainly LG&E personnel that were present during the initial construction of each unit at the power plants.

Well, once a unit became active and operated, then there were Louisville Gas & Electric employees there that were during the operation of a particular unit. Well, then the next five at Cane Run, and I believe at Mill Creek, there were four units. Those other units are being constructed, and so people in there operating the plant are exposed during the construction phase. And so what’s being installed during the construction phase? All of the things that I mentioned.

These power plants have miles of pipes that contain steam lines, and those steam lines are insulated with asbestos. So employees that are in the area are exposed to the cutting, the sawing, the application of the insulation to the steam lines. They are exposed to the application of the fire brick, which contains asbestos, into these giant furnaces or boilers. They are exposed to the insulation that is installed onto the turbines.

They have to cut and saw all those kinds of materials, and it created a substantial amount of dust. One way people were exposed was during the construction phase. Well then once the building’s in operation, as you can imagine, there’s a significant amount of maintenance that has to occur. And so a steam line goes out, somebody has to go in and remove the insulation and then fix the steam line.

Well, they had insulators there that did that. They had pipefitters that did that work. So the people that helped maintain the facility. They had electricians that worked on the turbines. A turbine’s a very sophisticated piece of equipment. It had to be in operation, they couldn’t have downtime, certainly of all six units. And so electricians would work on these turbines and they would be exposed to the insulation that was on the turbines.

They might have to remove a piece or somebody would have to remove it for them, and they would be exposed in that way. The wire and cable I mentioned earlier, a lot of those turbines had panel boxes and control equipment that contained asbestos containing wire and insulation. And so electricians would be exposed, pipe fitters would be exposed, the maintenance people would be exposed. There were a wide variety of people that it takes to operate a powerhouse.

You’ve got the control operators and all of the boilermakers, and the boiler operators, and people that operate the turbines. And cleaning crew, commonly called laborers. You had engineers that came into the plant. And so all of these people are exposed one way or the other during the construction phase, during maintenance activities, also during what we call overhauls. They were frequently, usually on a yearly or maybe every two year basis, they had to completely refurbished the inside of the boiler. So all that refractory and fire brick that contained asbestos had to come out, and then it had to go back in.

And at least until the mid 1970s, early 1980s, they just used new asbestos to replace the old asbestos. And so anybody that worked in those power plants, say from the 1950s to the 1980s, I think it’s practically impossible for them to avoid exposure in some meaningful, substantial way to asbestos at either of those two facilities.

Asbestos Exposure During LG&E Construction

John: Right. And you said that during the construction phase, they would build one of the boilers and bring that online, and then they would be building the next one and then the next one, and then the next one. So there’d be for a period of years perhaps where they’d be construction of some one of the boilers going on.

And then after they’re all online, then they’re doing maintenance on one or the other of these boilers. It just seems like constantly there’d be either something under construction or something being maintained, or something being overhauled, and there’d just be almost no escaping it.

Paul: That is a very accurate description. It took 15 years to build Cane Run, maybe 10 years to build Mill Creek. So absolutely, they tried to keep the construction separate from the operation, but quite frankly, it was impossible. Based on descriptions that I’ve received from our clients and their coworkers, the powerhouse is a very dusty, dirty place. And they’re constantly working on all of these various pieces of equipment, including the piping.

And I would say that on any given day somebody was disturbing asbestos containing materials at those facilities for a very long period of time, and most of the people that worked at these plants worked there for a very long period of time. Twenty-five, 30 years is the norm for the LG&E employees that I’ve represented over the years, and I think that was a pretty common experience for most folks. It’s virtually impossible that if you worked at one of those powerhouses, either during the construction or during the overhaul with any of the pieces of equipment, it’s virtually impossible that you weren’t exposed to asbestos.

What Should You Do If You Have Lung Cancer, Asbestosis, or Mesothelioma?

John: We know that asbestos exposure can lead to diseases like mesothelioma. If you were an employee at LG&E and you have lung cancer or asbestosis or mesothelioma, what should you do?

Paul: Well, certainly the most important thing for anyone to do who’s been diagnosed with one of these diseases, is to get their medical situation under control, make sure that their doctors understand the environment in which they worked. It’s not necessarily critical to the treatment of mesothelioma that the physicians know the precise details of exposure, but it can’t hurt, and it’s important to be able to provide the doctors with accurate information.

But certainly, I think it’s important to understand your legal rights. We’ve represented a number of people, and sadly, probably more than 10 or 15 people that have worked at these facilities who have been diagnosed with some form of asbestos disease, many of them with mesothelioma, many with lung cancer, quite a few with asbestosis. And then there are companies, manufacturers of products, and contractors that are still out there that can be held responsible for causing the disease.

We’ve sued manufacturers of products. We’ve sued the engineer architect who designed the powerhouse, and the construction companies that assisted. And so it’s critical to talk to a lawyer, talk to someone that has experience with these particular locations to get a better understanding. Because I think there’s a lawsuit there, and I think there are definitely companies that can be held responsible for causing this terrible cancer, or some of these other diseases.

The big problem, John, with mesothelioma in particular, is it’s very aggressive. It will require a substantial amount of treatment, there is no known cure for this cancer. And so the average life expectancy, unfortunately, is only six months to 18 months from the time of diagnosis. So if you are interested in pursuing a claim and understanding your legal rights, I know you have a lot of important things to worry about with respect to your health, but it’s important to hit the ground running and to talk to a lawyer so that we can make a decision together as to what’s the best plan of action for you under this unfortunately terrible circumstance you’ve been presented with.

Choose a Lawyer Who Has Experience With LG&E Cases

John: Given that you have to move so quickly on this, is it important to have a lawyer like yourself who really knows LG&E? And like you said, you know exactly who those subcontractors are that designed or installed these boilers, and the pipes and things like that. As opposed to working with somebody who would have to maybe start from scratch and try to figure out all of that information.

Paul: Absolutely. If somebody came to me today and said that they were exposed to any of the kinds of things that I’ve mentioned today, I could probably have a lawsuit drafted and filed within the next two or three days. We’ve litigated out of these plants more than a dozen times. We really don’t have to do a lot of what’s called discovery to get information concerning the types of products that were there, the manufacturers that were there.

We’ve conducted all of that already, and we would really be in a great position to be able to hit the ground running and to expedite the process. Unfortunately, John, our legal system is fantastic, and we have terrific judges, and I can’t say enough about our judicial system. The only drawback is that things take time.

And right now if I have a case and it’s already filed, and then I have the plaintiff’s deposition and the plaintiff being my client, and I go to court and I ask for a trial date, even the most sympathetic judges are going to say, “Mr. Kelley, I can’t get you a trial date for a year.” And then the defendants, there might be 10 defendants, which means there are 10 other lawyers’ schedules to deal with. And inevitably, some of those lawyers are going to say, “Well, I can’t try the case in February of 2024.”

And then before you know it, it’s May, June, July. And that’s tough. But the reason why I bring that up, the sooner we get started, the sooner we can get to that part, because we understand what the time limitations are with respect to the court. And it takes somebody three, four months to investigate and figure out who to sue, that’s three or four months later than what your trial is going to be.

And that’s three or four months later than a resolution of the case. Because most defendants will not settle, even consider settlement of a case, unless there’s a trial date staring them down and they know that they’re going to have to either settle the case or try it. And sometimes they don’t settle. And if they don’t settle, that means we get a trial date. But time is always of the essence, and whenever I get any type of mesothelioma case, whether it’s Louisville Gas & Electric or some other place, the ultimate goal for us is to get that case filed as quickly as possible so that we have a chance to get that case to trial while our client is alive, still generally healthy and able to participate. And at least can have that peace of mind that resolution has been had during their lifetime, and that they’ve been able to take care of their family.

Statute of Limitations on Asbestos Exposure Cases

John: Right. Another time constraint that you’re under is the statute of limitations. Can you talk a little bit about the statute of limitations on filing a case relating to asbestos exposure at Louisville Gas & Electric?

Paul: Absolutely. It’s generally one year from the date that you know or should know you have an injury, and also know or should know the cause of that injury. Typically speaking, my best advice to anyone is go a year from the diagnosis date. If you’ve been diagnosed with asbestosis or mesothelioma, it was caused by asbestos exposure, so you know what caused your injury.

Lung cancer has some other causes, but if you were exposed to asbestos and you know it, go by that date. There are some exceptions to the rule, but you can’t go wrong. As I mentioned before though, John, a year is the deadline, and you got to get it in within that year. But if you come to us, we’re getting that case filed as quickly as possible, perhaps even within a matter of days because of all the issues that I’ve identified about the difficulty of getting the case to trial and the dire situation that most of our clients are in, and trying to expedite a resolution for them.

But sometimes they don’t come to us until 10 months after their diagnosis and we’ve got to hustle to make sure that we get the case filed. And it’s just important. A lot of people don’t realize that they don’t have that much time to file a case. Some states have a longer statute of limitations, Kentucky does not. Very important to talk to a lawyer immediately upon diagnosis so that you make sure that you can get your case filed on time.

Contact Satterley & Kelley to Learn More

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thanks, John.

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at satterleylaw.com. Or call (855)-385-9532.

Explore More Podcasts
Legal Process and Lawsuits:
Corporate Responsibility and Bankruptcy:
Specific Companies and Industries:
Health and Treatment:
Industry and Product Exposures:
Accidents and Injuries:

BREAKING: Tiger Brands Faces Mounting Talc Asbestos Litigation  

Those who follow mesothelioma and asbestos-related news will already be familiar with the lawsuits faced by American pharmaceutical giant J&J regarding their baby powder and potential asbestos contamination.

For the uninitiated, J&J’s talc-based baby powder has been the company’s signature product since its inception in the 19th century and has helped create and promote J&J’s safe, family-friendly reputation.

In recent years, however, J&J’s baby powder has been the subject of over 38,000 consumer safety and class action lawsuits, largely alleging that the talc-based baby powder caused serious health problems in consumers. Some of these claims allege that J&J baby powder tainted with asbestos has caused cancer in plaintiffs and their loved ones, including ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.  

J&J has continuously maintained that these lawsuits are based on “misinformation”, and that their product has been falsely portrayed as dangerous, further claiming that their baby powder and other talc products have never been carcinogenic or dangerously contaminated with asbestos.

However, consumer rights advocates, plaintiffs, and juries seem to disagree. So far, lawsuits over J&J baby powder contamination have resulted in $3.5 billion in verdicts and settlements. Over $2 billion of those settlements was awarded in a single class action suit brought by 22 women, who claimed that they or their loved ones were exposed to carcinogens via J&J baby powder that had been contaminated with asbestos.

In 2020, J&J stopped selling talc-based baby powders in the U.S., and in August of this year, they announced that they would stop selling talc-based baby powders internationally in 2023. While J&J will not be discontinuing their baby powder, they will be changing the main ingredient from talc to corn starch. They maintain that this decision is sales-based rather than safety-based.

However, recent news indicates that other baby powder companies are taking note of J&J’s legal troubles—and at the very least, that there is an increased awareness of the need to prevent talc-based asbestos-contamination in baby powder.

Less than a month after J&J announced its international recall of talc-based baby powder, Tiger Brands, one of the biggest packaged goods producers in Africa, announced a recall of their Purity Essentials Baby Powder due to trace amounts of asbestos found in their talc test samples.

Tiger Brands, which is South Africa’s largest food producer, is also a major food and packaged goods producer in Cameroon, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Nigeria, and Mozambique. Tiger Brand products can also be found in South America, primarily in Chile.

Despite the proximity to the J&J announcement, Tiger Foods Chief Operating Officer Noel Doyle stated that the asbestos testing and subsequent September 8th recall “was unrelated to anything linked to J&J issues.” He emphasized that once the current recall is completed, Tiger Brands will continue selling their talc-based baby powder.

“While we found trace levels of asbestos in the raw material”, said Noel, “we’ve acted to recall everything that’s on the market, despite the fact that previous testing did not show any trace levels.”

Baby Powder, Talc, and Asbestos: What You Need to Know

Baby powder, so-named because of its use to prevent diaper rash, is a moisture-absorbing astringent powder that is also commonly used by adults to prevent chafing and for cosmetic purposes. Its traditional primary ingredient is talc, a common mineral made up of silicon, oxygen, hydrogen, and magnesium.

There are several general causes for concern about talc that have been raised by these lawsuits and investigated by medical authorities, scientists, consumer advocates, journalists, and litigators.

One major concern raised by talc-based baby powder (and other talc products) has to do with ovarian cancer, and whether women who regularly apply these products to their genital region are at increased risk. Studies regarding talc and ovarian cancer are still ongoing: some lab studies on rodents showed tumor formation from talc, and while some human studies seemed to indicate a slightly increased risk, the results are still largely inconclusive. Still, the potential link between ovarian cancer risk and genital application of talc-based baby powder has been recognized. In fact, the WHO has classified the use of baby powder and talc powder generally around the genital area as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans.

Another major concern has to do with asbestos contamination. Asbestos is a mineral that was once widely used in manufacturing and construction but has since been found to be carcinogenic—most frequently causing a cancer known as mesothelioma.

Talc and asbestos deposits are often found in similar or adjacent areas and are often mined in similar ways. As a result, when talc is mined and processed, it can sometimes get mixed with asbestos—and talc that is contaminated with any detectable amount of asbestos has been classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be carcinogenic.

This means that it is essential for all companies utilizing talc in their products to carefully monitor and test for asbestos contamination, and to immediately act and issue recalls when contamination is found.

Investigations into J&J’s practices suggested that they may not have been doing their due diligence when it comes to asbestos monitoring in their talc supply. In fact, one such investigation, published by Reuters in 2018, found that asbestos had been found in J&J talc products since 1971 at the earliest, continuing throughout the 2000s—and that J&J had been aware of this fact. This investigation—among others—contributed significantly to the strength of the lawsuits against J&J.

Advocates are hopeful that the recent news from Tiger Brands is indicative a shift in corporate thinking, in which companies utilizing talc are beginning to take heed of their responsibility to consumers—as well as the potential repercussions of not upholding that responsibility.

Check out a similar story about Johnson and Johnson here or call us at 855-385-9532 if you or a loved one has Mesothelioma.

5 Things to Do After a Mesothelioma Diagnosis

If you have just received your mesothelioma diagnosis, you are probably overwhelmed—by thoughts, by feelings, and by treading suddenly into unfamiliar territory. It can be difficult to make sense of what’s happening, let alone knowing what to do next.

However, there are people who have been where you are now, and you are not alone. There are a few steps that people with recent mesothelioma diagnoses can take to make sense of what’s next in order to start their treatment journey.

1. Learn More About Mesothelioma

This may or may not be your first time hearing about mesothelioma, but most people don’t know much about it.

When it comes to something like cancer, knowledge is power. It’s important to know everything you can about what mesothelioma is, and what your mesothelioma diagnosis will mean in your life. The more you know how mesothelioma works and how it affects patients, the better you can prepare for the journey ahead.

Make sure you get a description of what type of mesothelioma you have. There are three types of mesothelioma that may be diagnosed in patients:

  • Pleural Mesothelioma: Cancer that develops in the pleura, the thin membrane lining the lungs and chest cavity. This is the most common type of mesothelioma, accounting for around 70-80% of cases.
  • Peritoneal Mesothelioma: Cancer that develops in the peritoneum, the thin layer of tissue lining the abdomen. This is the second most common type of mesothelioma, accounting for around 20% of cases.
  • Pericardial Mesothelioma: A much rarer cancer that develops in the thin layer of tissue surrounding the heart. This only accounts to around 1% of mesothelioma cases.

From there, you can get the information you need from your doctor and healthcare team, as well as from healthcare specialists, communities and advocates who support mesothelioma patients.

2. Be Curious and Ask Questions

Another essential part of finding out everything you can about mesothelioma is not being afraid to ask questions. You will have a lot of information presented to you at once and will have many important decisions to make in the coming weeks and months. It is entirely reasonable for you to have questions and for you to ask those questions to members of your care team.

Never be afraid to ask about any part of your diagnosis or treatment process. This includes asking to see a mesothelioma specialist—or a second mesothelioma specialist— for a second opinion. No reputable doctor will be offended if you ask for a second opinion. It is your right as a patient, and ultimately helps your mesothelioma doctor to treat you in the best way possible.

You will likely have to choose between several different treatment methods, including chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Asking questions to help inform your decision is an expected and important part of the process.

If you are having trouble remembering your questions, write them down before appointments. Alternatively, your care team or doctor may have an online portal through which you can also ask questions.

3. Find a Support Network

Since mesothelioma is a relatively rare cancer, it might feel like there isn’t anyone who understands exactly what you’re going through. However, there are many other people who have been diagnosed with mesothelioma, and many other families and loved ones of those diagnosed with mesothelioma.

Both patients and their loved ones can find support groups (largely online, though some meet in person) through which you can form meaningful relationships with other people and families battling mesothelioma, and with whom you can exchange information and advice.

For those who need help finding resources to reach out to, an oncology or hospital social worker can help you find programs and groups on both local and national levels.

4. Get Yourself Ready for Treatment

There are many things you can do proactively to give yourself the biggest possible leg up when it comes to your mesothelioma treatment.

  • Have a comfortable, accessible place to recover.  Make sure that you have a quiet, clean, and comfortable atmosphere to come home to during your treatments.
  • Maintain nutrition. Now more than ever, diet is key. Make sure to get plenty of protein and eat lots of fruits and vegetables.
  • Prioritize good sleep. The body needs sleep to heal and to endure treatment. Make sure to get as much sleep as possible both before and during treatment.
  • Exercise as much as possible. While you may be limited in your ability to exercise by your condition and the effects of treatment, try to get as much activity as you can.
  • Use knowledge of common treatment side effects to plan ahead. Some of the treatments for mesothelioma have common side effects. For example, chemotherapy often causes nausea and food aversion, so a source of calories that’s easier for someone in that state to consume (such as Ensure or other meal replacement drinks) should be kept on-hand in advance.

5. Learn About Your Financial and Legal Options

If you have mesothelioma, there’s a very high chance that it was caused by exposure to asbestos of some kind. Mesothelioma forms when inhaled asbestos fibers lodge in the lining of the lungs, abdomen, or (much more rarely) heart, and cancer.

Treatment for mesothelioma, like most cancers, can be costly. It’s essential to contact your health insurance company to see what your individual health insurance plan covers and what it may not cover (and will therefore be up to you and your family to pay out-of-pocket).

However, additional financial aid may be found through the pursuit of legal avenues. An experienced, knowledgeable mesothelioma attorney may be able to get you compensation for your asbestos exposure that may cover the cost of your medical care (and other expenses related to your mesothelioma). Make sure to choose a reputable mesothelioma lawyer or law firm with relevant experience and to read up on similar mesothelioma cases to get a good sense of what others in your position have been able to sue for.  

Call us toll-free at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form to arrange a free consultation.

Clinical Trial Finds Impressive Results in New Second-Line Pleural Mesothelioma Treatment

If you are a mesothelioma patient or a loved one of a mesothelioma patient, you know how essential clinical trials can be. Clinical trials offer an opportunity for potentially more effective treatment for the individual mesothelioma patient, as well as the opportunity to contribute to the larger effort to beat mesothelioma once and for all.

Clinical trials are especially appealing to mesothelioma patients, as many are diagnosed in the later stages of the disease, significantly narrowing their treatment options. Clinical trials give patients and their loved ones the chance to expand their arsenal in the fight against mesothelioma, an opportunity which many going through mesothelioma treatment enthusiastically embrace. Trials already in progress offer new information and hope for mesothelioma patients and their families about potential treatments and improved prognoses on the horizon.

One such clinical trial conducted recently on a new mesothelioma treatment has been very promising. The study, conducted by the Netherland Cancer Institute in Amsterdam, tested the combination of Keytruda (pembrolizumab) and Lenvatinib (sometimes known as Lenvima) as a second-line treatment (a treatment to use when the first recommended treatment isn’t working) for pleural mesothelioma.

Keytruda is a humanized antibody and immunotherapy treatment used to combat a wide range of cancers, and Lenvatinib is a multiple kinase inhibitor, which blocks cancer proteins. The study examined the use of both medications, and the ways that their combined effects may be helpful for mesothelioma patients.

The findings were presented at the IASCL 2022 World Conference on Lung Cancer in Vienna, Austria earlier this summer. One of the lead investigators of the study, Li-Anne Douma, represented the research team in presenting the results to the Conference, and called the findings “better than expected.”

For those new to the subject, clinical studies have four phases. Phase I, which was already completed for this treatment, tested for basic safety of the treatment in humans, ensuring that it is not widely lethal and there are relatively limited serious adverse health effects.

Phase II focuses on the effectiveness of the treatment and the best dosage and delivery method, as well as any potential side effects. That is the phase of treatment that was just completed by the researchers at the Netherlands Cancer Center.

If approved, Phase III of the study will be much larger, and will likely involve volunteers from diverse population sets. It will examine whether the treatment would be both safe and effective for a wide variety of people, gathering more information about potential combinations of treatments, different dosages, and other different treatment components.

If results are promising enough, the treatment may then be approved for a New Drug Application (NDA), which contains the research, data, and findings from all phases. If the FDA (or a similar European regulatory body) signs off on the NDA, the treatment combination will become available on the market.

Phase IV will then occur after the introduction of the treatment to the market, during which researchers will continue to gather data and monitor the treatment as it is applied in much larger and more diverse populations, looking out for any potentially serious health complications that may only arise when larger populations are involved.

As aforementioned, the Netherland Cancer Institute study on Keytruda/Levatinib treatment for pleural mesothelioma is still in Phase II of clinical testing. This round of testing was conducted on 38 patients whose mesothelioma had continued to progress even after receiving standard-of-care treatment (chemotherapy). The study examined the use of Keytruda, which has been well-received in the treatment of several different cancers since it was approved for use in 2020 but has only shown limited success as a sole treatment method (or, as a “monotherapy”) for mesothelioma. Only around 20% of mesothelioma patients were responsive to monotheraputic treatment with Keytruda.

It was hypothesized that what Keytruda needed was an “effective drug partner”, for a combined, interactive effect, or “synergy.” That’s what Lenvatinib was brought in to do. Lenvatinib, which was originally developed to treat thyroid cancer, has been shown to be effective in blocking tumor growth. It is usually prescribed as a monotreatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (a type of liver cancer), and in conjunction with other drugs to treat renal cell carcinoma (a type of kidney cancer).

Lenvatinib is known as “precision medicine”, because it excels at doing something specific (i.e., blocking the growth of tumors) in a limited set of contexts. This study used Lenvatinib’s precision abilities as a partner to Keytruda, treating mesothelioma by targeting certain types of proteins that Keytruda is normally unable to control on its own.

The Keytruda/Lenvatinib combo has already been shown to be effective and has been approved for use in the treatment of endometrial cancer. The hope of the clinical trial was that it could be similarly helpful for the treatment of pleural mesothelioma.

The results were objectively impressive: combined Lenvatinib/Keytruda treatment had a response rate of 58%, which is significantly higher than Keytruda’s monotherapy response rate of around 20%.

Douma stated that she and her team would “like to avoid conclusions being drawn too early”, which is prudent for any study. It should be noted that there is still no effective long-term treatment for most mesothelioma patients. However, the possibility of another helpful second-line treatment for pleural mesothelioma is a source of hope for patients and their families.

If approved for widespread use, the Levatinib/Keytruda treatment would join the quickly increasing roster of potential mesothelioma treatments: in 2020, another immunotherapy combination treatment—Opdivo and Yervoy—was approved for use as a first-line treatment, adding to former standard of care (which until that time, for most mesothelioma patients, included only chemotherapy).  

While larger trials and further research is still needed, this development is widely considered to be good news for the mesothelioma community.

Call us toll-free at 855-385-9532 or fill out our contact form to schedule a free consultation.

Choosing a Mesothelioma Treatment Center

If you’ve just been diagnosed with mesothelioma, you’re probably overwhelmed with all of the new information coming your way. However, with mesothelioma, time is often of the essence, and it’s crucial to get a treatment plan in order as soon as you can.

What does mesothelioma treatment look like?

Different mesothelioma diagnoses have different paths to treatment. However, in most cases, mesothelioma cancer treatment may combine chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, and/or experimental therapies. It may also involve palliative care or supportive care, which focuses on providing relief from symptoms, improving quality of life, and extending life expectancy for patients.

Your exact treatment will depend on your type of mesothelioma, what stage it is and your overall health and medical history.

Most importantly, treatment choices depend on your needs and preferences. Your medical team will provide you with options and information about your choices, but the final choices when it comes to your treatment depend on what you would like to prioritize.

Some patients want aggressive treatment that will give them the best chance at living longer, no matter what. Some people want to improve their quality of life and are much more interested in focusing on that element of care.

It is essential to always get a second opinion when dealing with a diagnosis like mesothelioma so that you can arrive at the best possible treatment plan.

The common treatment methods for mesothelioma include:

  • Chemotherapy: Chemotherapy involves using powerful cytotoxic drugs to target, damage, and hopefully eliminate cancer cells. It can be helpful in reducing the size of tumors, which helps fight cancer by reducing the spread and making surgeries more successful, while also alleviating symptoms caused by larger tumors.
  • Surgery: Mesothelioma surgery usually attempts to remove as much of the cancerous tissue as possible, often in combination with other treatments. Mesothelioma, patients with more advanced stage cancer and those with distant spread tumors may not benefit from this sort of surgery.
  • Radiation: Radiation therapy involves using a beam of energized particles to kill cancer cells. It is often used before surgery to shrink tumors and/or after surgery to target any remaining cancer cells. While it has traditionally been administered from outside of the body, new forms of radiation can be administered internally.
  • Experimental Therapies: There are many types of new experimental treatments being developed to treat mesothelioma. Many of these treatments are only available in certain facilities and under certain conditions (i.e., they may require signing up for a clinical trial).

What are the Best Mesothelioma Treatment Centers?

Once you have your diagnosis and a sense of what sort of treatment you would like to pursue, it’s time to think about where you want to be treated. While there are many cancer treatment facilities throughout the country, there are several centers and experts that focus specifically on rare cancers like mesothelioma.

If you are considering treatment at a cancer center, it’s essential to know which centers will give you the best chance of a good outcome. When evaluating whether a mesothelioma treatment center is offering the best possible care, you should look for the following:

  • Noted experts among staff, and physicians actively involved in research (as they are most likely to be up to date on the latest mesothelioma knowledge)
  • Offering a full range of standard treatments (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation), and ideally additional, more experimental treatments, such as targeted therapy, immunotherapy, photodynamic therapy, gene therapy, HIPEC for peritoneal mesothelioma, and/or cryotherapy).
  • Offering clinical trials and enrollment in ongoing research
  • Providing a diverse range of doctors and other professionals to make up your treatment team, including nutritionists, physical therapists, and psychologists/social workers.

If you’re looking for a mesothelioma-specific cancer center, you might want to start your search with one of the nine centers below, which are all known to offer excellent mesothelioma treatment and care:

  1. Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA: Through its own award-winning cancer treatment program and in consortium with other highly rated cancer specialist hospitals in the area (such as the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Brigham and Women’s offers a wide range of resources and treatments to mesothelioma patients. It is also the location of the International Mesothelioma Program, where around 200 patients each year are admitted for some of the most cutting-edge mesothelioma treatment available.
  2. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX: One of the country’s highest rated cancer centers, the MD Anderson Cancer Center has a specific focus on lung and chest cancers (including pleural and pericardial mesothelioma). As a research hospital, they offer experimental treatments and many opportunities for participation in clinical trials.
  3. Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, NY: This well-established name in the medical world has two of the world’s top experts of mesothelioma: Dr. Raja Flores and Dr. Daniel Labow. Dr. Flores is a top expert in pleural mesothelioma, while Dr. Labow is a top expert in peritoneal mesothelioma. In addition to offering access to two of the top minds in the field, Mt. Sinai also offers multi-modal treatments for mesothelioma that have been proven most effective for many patients.
  4. The Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH: The Cleveland Clinic’s Cancer Institute focuses specifically on lung-related cancers, including mesothelioma. As a result, the Cancer Institute can offer a wide range of impressively credentialed specialists, who can contribute their skills and strategy to your cancer treatment. This is a particularly good choice for those with rarer types of pleural mesothelioma, as there are specialists on-staff in every possible sub-type of lung-related cancer.
  5. Pacific Mesothelioma Center (PMC) at the Pacific Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Los Angeles, CA: The PMC is a specialized unit of the well-regarded Pacific Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, which partners frequently with UCLA and the West Los Angeles, VA Medical Center. Focused on pleural mesothelioma, the PMC is currently in the process of developing many treatments and therapies aimed at improving prognosis and extending the life of pleural mesothelioma patients. Rather than viewing mesothelioma as a terminal diagnosis, they approach it as a chronic, albeit serious health condition to be managed.
  6. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL: In addition to being a highly rated cancer center in all regards, the H. Lee Moffit Center is particularly well-known in the southwest for its Department of Thoracic Oncology and Mesothelioma Research and Treatment Center, which provides award-winning care to mesothelioma patients.
  7. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago is a research dynamo, producing some of the best medical innovations throughout the past century. Their Mesothelioma Program is no exception and is known as a world leader for both innovative treatment and complex cancer research. Patients are offered individualized, empathetic care with ample access to clinical studies.
  8. Mesothelioma Treatment Center, Baylor College of Medicine Lung Institute, Houston, TX:  Like Boston, Houston is a city known for its excellent hospitals and medical centers, and the MTC at Baylor is one of the best for mesothelioma patients. Teams of highly qualified, highly knowledgeable experts offer top of the line, individualized treatment, and the ongoing research at the hospital provides ample opportunity for inclusion in clinical trials. The MTC also emphasizes psychological and spiritual care for both mesothelioma patients and their loved ones.
  9. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA: The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center has a reputation for being one of the most established cancer treatment centers specializing in rare and complex cancers in the country. Their Mesothelioma Specialty Care Program offers experts in the field (such as Dr. David Bartlett, a world leader in peritoneal mesothelioma), as well as caring, thoughtful, and innovative care and access to clinical studies.

Why You Should Hire Satterley & Kelley, PLLC for Your Cancer Case

Mesothelioma is caused by asbestos fibers in the body. If you’re diagnosed with it or another asbestos-related cancer, you may be entitled to compensation for what you’ve endured. This includes physical and mental pain and suffering, financial costs, medical bills, and how the disease impacts your relationships. It can be due to asbestos released during accidental fires or any other source.

You need a law firm with experience representing victims taking legal action against the asbestos industry. Satterley & Kelley, PLLC attorneys have helped asbestos victims for more than 25 years.

We have relationships with the best experts in the world to help us prove that asbestos caused your injury and the physical, emotional, psychological, and financial harm you suffer.

Call Us Today For A Free Consultation

Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, attorneys are your boots on the ground if you or a family member in Kentucky suffers from mesothelioma or another asbestos-related condition. Call us at 855-385-9532, locally 502-589-5600, or contact us online to arrange a free initial consultation with a Satterley & Kelley PLLC lawyer.