Railroad Found Responsible for Deaths Related to Asbestos-Containing Vermiculite It Shipped

A jury in federal court in Montana found that Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway contributed to the deaths of two people. The jury decided they were exposed to asbestos many years ago when BNSF shipped vermiculite tainted with asbestos through Libby, Montana, where thousands have been sickened.

On April 22, the jury awarded $4 million each to the plaintiffs’ estates. Joyce Walder and Thomas Wells died of mesothelioma in 2020. Jurors ruled that the asbestos-contaminated vermiculite that spilled in the defendant’s rail yard in Libby was a substantial factor in their illnesses and deaths, reports the Associated Press. The jury didn’t find that BNSF acted with indifference or intentionally, so there was no punitive damage award.

Another trial against the railroad due to the death of another Libby resident is scheduled to begin in May in federal court in Missoula. The Libby plaintiffs claim BNSF knew the vermiculite was dangerous but failed to protect residents from it. The plaintiffs didn’t work at the mine or for BNSF but lived in the area when the mine operated.

Vermiculite’s Toxic Legacy in Libby, Montana

The W.R. Grace & Co. purchased the vermiculite mine in 1963, operating until it closed and stopped shipping vermiculite in 1990. The mine operated seven miles outside Libby from the 1920s until 1990. Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. bought BNSF in 2010.

Though operations shut down more than 40 years ago, given mesothelioma may take decades to develop,  healthy people in the area exposed to asbestos may develop this deadly disease in the future. Vermiculite was used as insulation and for other commercial purposes.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency came to Libby in 1999 after news reports of illnesses and deaths of mine workers and their family members. In 2009. the agency  declared the town the country’s first public health emergency under the federal Superfund cleanup program.

What Did BNSF Know About Vermiculite and Asbestos, and When Did They Know It?

The case in the federal civil court in Missoula is the first of many against BNSF to reach a trial over its Libby operations. The company is accused of contributing to the hundreds of deaths and thousands made ill by asbestos-containing vermiculite.

BNSF claims railroad employees didn’t know vermiculite was contaminated with asbestos. The company also used expert witnesses to testify that the deceased may have been exposed to asbestos elsewhere. The company argued federal law required it to ship the vermiculite and that W.R. Grace was obligated to inform it of health hazards, but its employees concealed this information from them.

Plaintiffs’ attorneys stated that BNSF should have known of vermiculite’s dangers because of the following:

  • W.R. Grace employees put signs on rail cars carrying vermiculite warning of potential health risks. Jurors saw an image of a warning label plaintiffs’ attorneys said was attached to rail cars as early as 1977. They warned that bodily harm could result after inhaling asbestos dust
  • An expert witness for the plaintiffs testified that BNSF and its predecessors sponsored geologic studies in the area, according to US News. They would’ve known as early as the 1920s that vermiculite mined near Libby had asbestos
  • In the 1930s, research disseminated by the Association of American Railroads showed the health hazards of asbestos exposure

W.R. Grace wasn’t a defendant at the trial. The company played a central role in Libby’s ecological and public health disaster and has paid significant settlements to victims. The judge repeatedly reminded the jury their focus was on BNSF, not W.R. Grace.

Federal prosecutors indicted W. R. Grace and some of its executives on criminal charges in 2005 over the vermiculite contamination in Libby. A jury acquitted them in a 2009 trial.

The pollution in Libby caused by the mining and transportation of vermiculite is still being cleaned up, mostly thanks to taxpayer dollars.

Call Us Today For A Free Initial Consultation

You may be entitled to compensation for your asbestos-related injuries if you are diagnosed with mesothelioma or another health condition caused by asbestos.

Call our Louisville office toll-free at 855-385-9532 or complete our online contact form for a free initial consultation concerning your case.

You Risk More than an Accident If You’re Involved in a Road Rage Incident

We are a frustrated, angry society. We take it out on strangers on social media, the other team at sporting events, and other drivers. Road rage inspires highly aggressive driving, which spawns more aggressive driving by others upset or offended by them. Road rage has evolved over the years, and it’s more common that these incidents include not just middle fingers, bumpers, and horns but also guns.

What is Road Rage?

Road rage is the aggressive and sometimes violent behaviors shown by drivers. They can include intentionally striking another vehicle and verbal and physical assaults. Road rage spreads when one driver starts driving aggressively and dangerously, and another driver seeks to retaliate because of their actions.

What Causes Road Rage?

It may begin with a driver with high levels of stress and displaced anger. Youth and substance abuse may also be factors, according to Psychology Today. High-anger drivers engage in aggressive and hostile thinking while they speed, weave between lanes, tailgate, and run red lights. These drivers often aren’t just angry while driving, they’re angry all day. They’re also more likely to be male, impulsive, and anxious.

How Often Does Road Rage Involve Guns?

The number of people shot in road rage incidents increased more than 400%, from 92 to 481, from 2014 to 2023, according to Trace. Over that period, 3,095 people were shot, and 777 died of their wounds.

Gun-related road rage incidents have more than doubled in the past ten years, and the number of victims injured or killed by gunshots increased more than fivefold. Trace reports that there were 37 road rage incidents involving gunfire in Kentucky from 2014 to 2023.

Here are some recent news stories covering road rage incidents:

  • Greene County, Missouri, deputies are trying to find the driver of a truck accused of firing shots during a road rage incident in Springfield. Investigators reported that a pickup driver pulling an empty trailer became angry at a driver trying to pass him. The driver fired several shots which hit the vehicle, but there were no injuries, reports KYTV
  • A Louisville resident was hospitalized with several bullet wounds in his legs after a car crash in April in the city’s Cherokee Triangle neighborhood. Police reported that the incident may have started with a car and motorcycle accident. The drivers started arguing, and one shot the other, according to WAVE
  • A Murray, Kentucky, man was arrested at the Nashville Airport after a road rage incident. Law enforcement reports that after two motorists driving to the terminal tried to merge into a single lane, one became upset and showed a gun to the other, reports WKRN
  • A truck driver was murdered in March after a road rage incident in Caddo Parrish, Louisiana. Police report the truck driver and the driver of an SUV left their vehicles, the SUV driver pulled a gun, and the truck driver started to run when he was shot and killed, according to KSLA

How many people carry guns in their vehicles? No one knows for sure, but guns taken from vehicles are the largest source of stolen guns in the US, reports the New York Times.

How Can Road Rage Cause Accidents and Injuries?

Gunshot wounds are one risk of many.

Road rage often involves speeding, which carries a higher risk of a collision because there’s less time to react and a longer distance for the vehicle to stop. If the driver approaches an intersection, they may go too fast to stop for a red light or stop sign, crash into another vehicle, or strike a pedestrian. The higher the speed, the more likely a crash will cause more severe injuries because greater force is involved.

Someone driving aggressively may weave in and out of lanes, potentially sideswiping another vehicle. One accident on a busy roadway may start a chain reaction, resulting in multiple vehicles colliding.

How Can I Prevent Being Involved in a Road Rage Incident?

Whatever is going on in your life, push it aside and drive responsibly and safely. If you cause an accident, your life will be much more stressful. If the road rager cut you off, let it go.

Driving isn’t a video game. It’s real life. You don’t get points for catching up to the car, swearing at the driver, or cutting them off. If this happens, you’re the driver  with road rage, and if you cause an accident, you’re the villain, not the victim.

Speak To a Car Accident Attorney Today

Have you been seriously injured by road rage? If so, you may be entitled to compensation, and Satterley & Kelley PLLC can be your boots on the ground.

Call Satterley & Kelley PLLC to speak with a skilled personal injury lawyer today. Call our office in Louisville toll-free at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form to get started.

Road Construction and Repair is a Dangerous and Sometimes Fatal Job

We often encounter road work, whether it’s on a local road or a major interstate. We might think about how this may delay our trip or grow frustrated at the traffic jam in front of us. How many of us think about the safety of those doing the work?

We complain about how bad roads and highways are and about inconvenience when they’re repaired or expanded. We need road and highway repairs because these roadways help everyone who uses them.

Smooth, functional roads that aren’t packed with traffic get us where we want to go and make driving safer. A driver may swerve to avoid a pothole and hit another vehicle instead. As more vehicles pack into a limited space, it’s just a matter of time before a driver’s mistake causes a crash.

New and Better Roadways Come at a Price

For us to enjoy better roads, those working on them need to do their jobs, not spend time in hospitals or be killed by careless, speeding drivers.

Blake Barnes, a 22-year-old Transportation Cabinet worker, was killed in Hodgenville, Kentucky, in April while flagging traffic, reports WDKY. A man driving a van struck him in a work zone. Barnes is one of many killed or injured on road repair and construction sites.

Road construction workers were killed on the job during the first three months of the year in Alaska, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Texas, and North Carolina, USA Today reports. Six workers were killed a year ago when two cars traveling more than 100 miles an hour crashed into a construction site on the Baltimore Beltway in Maryland. Often, law enforcement members at the site are also killed or injured in these accidents.

From 2003 to 2020, 2,222 highway workers were killed in US highway work zones, for an average of 123 every year, according to the Bureau of Labor (BLS) statistics. The agency reports that from 2011 to 2020:

  • 73% of worker deaths (or 919 people) happened at road construction sites
  • 63% of these accidents (or 577 people) involved the victim being struck by a vehicle

USA Today reports that workers on foot being struck by vehicles made up 45.3% of deaths at road construction sites from 2017 to 2019. Other causes include accidents while workers are in vehicles, they’re struck by trucks and equipment involved in the construction work, falls, and electrocutions. In 2020, 857 people died in 774 work zone accidents. Most were motorists and passengers, with 117 construction workers killed.

How Can Drivers Make Worksites Safer?

We need to slow down because the higher our vehicle’s speed, the more difficult it is to control. It also takes longer to stop, and there’s less time to react to situations. Drivers should go the posted speed limit or slower if driving conditions aren’t ideal.

If there are multiple lanes in the area, safely get into the lane farthest from the work site before entering the work zone. Drivers should be very aware of what’s beside and in front of them to avoid colliding with another vehicle. If there’s a multiple-vehicle crash, at least one could hit construction workers.

How Can Contractors Make Worksites Safer?

The contractor in charge of the site must use common sense and comply with federal, state, and local safety rules. Some of the things a contractor must do are:

  • Properly train workers about job site safety
  • Establish a perimeter around the site
  • Make sure there are sufficient barriers between traffic and workers
  • Have a person on site who’s responsible for safety matters
  • Have law enforcement control traffic when flaggers aren’t enough
  • Ensure there is sufficient signage in the right places to warn drivers of the site, including lane closures and speed limits

Worksite injuries and deaths caused by traffic may result from multiple mistakes by the driver and the company responsible for the project. Both may be held accountable for their negligence.

What Rights Does the Injured Worker Have?

If you or a family member are injured or killed in one of these accidents, contact Satterley & Kelley PLLC because you may be entitled to compensation for the harm you suffer. These situations may be complex, factually and legally, depending on the situation, and we can start a thorough investigation to determine who did what to cause the accident.

Someone working on a road construction project could first turn to worker’s compensation benefits from their employer. If the worksite wasn’t adequately protected, or management committed negligence that played a role in the accident, and the injured worker was employed by a subcontractor (not the main contractor responsible for the site), the main contractor may be held at least partially responsible.

The motorist causing an accident that led to the injuries may also be liable. If the worker dies of their injuries, their next of kin may be able to file a wrongful death claim against the responsible parties.

Speak To a Car Accident Attorney Today

If you’re injured in a serious accident in Kentucky, we are your boots on the ground. Call Satterley & Kelley PLLC to talk to a skilled personal injury lawyer today. Call our Louisville office toll-free at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form to get started.

Steps to Keep You Safer the Next Time You’re on Your Motorcycle

As the temperatures rise, more Kentuckians will be on their motorcycles. If you ride one, you have a much greater risk of severe or fatal injuries than someone in a vehicle. Here is some advice to help you avoid an accident, but if you have one, lessen the injuries you suffer. They may also help you get as much compensation as possible from an insurance claim or lawsuit against the party causing your accident.

Compensation claims for injuries caused by accidents are based on negligence law. Kentucky has comparative negligence laws. Even if you’re partially to blame for the accident you can recover compensation, but your share of the blame will reduce it. That compensation can also be reduced if you made mistakes that worsened your injuries.

Insurance companies love blaming accident victims for their injuries. If you avoid negligent acts that could lead to an accident and take steps to be as safe as possible, you will simplify your case and maximize your recovery. Not being the safest or smartest motorcyclist won’t necessarily prevent recovery, but you’ll face obstacles that need not be in your way.

Never Ride While Impaired

Riding while impaired increases your chances of an accident. That impairment can be caused by the following:

  • Alcohol
  • Drugs, legal or illegal
  • Fatigue

You don’t need to be drunk, high, or falling asleep to be impaired. Just a single drink, one allergy pill, or missing a couple of hours of sleep may be enough (and they will be plenty if you have a combination of these issues). You risk being unable to perceive the dangers of your ride or respond to them effectively or quickly enough to keep you upright.

Always Wear a Helmet

Kentucky law requires you to use a helmet under limited circumstances. It’s mandatory if:

  • You’re younger than 21
  • Have an instruction permit
  • Have your motorcycle license for less than a year

If you fall into these categories and get into an accident without a helmet and suffer a head injury, the insurance company will argue that you broke the law and ran the risk, and their insured shouldn’t take the blame. Whether that’s a valid argument depends on the facts of the situation, but at the very least, expect a cut in the recovery you may have received otherwise.

Even if you need not wear a helmet under Kentucky law, failing to do so will hurt your injury claim. Just because doing something is legal doesn’t make it a good idea. Using a helmet reduces the risk of suffering head injuries, including those that may kill you, according to a 2008 medical journal article.

The fact something solid like a helmet on your head will offer more protection if it hits another vehicle, the pavement, or another hard object than riding without one is not rocket science. It’s common sense.

Head injuries can cause catastrophic brain damage that can shorten or severely limit your life. It may be the bulk of your injury compensation claim, and if you rode without a helmet, you may end up with a fraction of an award you would’ve received otherwise.

Always Ride Defensively

You must be aware of your surroundings at all times. That includes vehicles in your lane, oncoming traffic, bicyclists, pedestrians, and road conditions. You need to plan evasive action to prevent an accident or at least reduce your injuries if one happens.

Issues you should be aware of include:

  • Accidents involving vehicles turning into the path of motorcycles are common, so don’t assume a driver in the opposite lane approaching an intersection or driveway will stay there
  • Be wary of potholes, frost heaves, or spilled oil on the road, which could cause you to lose control
  • The faster you travel and the less light, the more difficult defensive driving becomes. You’ll have a harder time seeing possible threats and less time to react

Don’t let your guard down if you’re close to home. Many accidents happen when drivers near the end of their trip. They’re more relaxed in familiar territory and assume they’re safer than they are.

Speak To a Satterley & Kelley, PLLC Motorcycle Accident Lawyer Today

If you or a family member is injured in a Kentucky motorcycle accident, we want to hear from you because we can help you recover the full and fair compensation you deserve. Let us be your boots on the ground and guide you through the process.

If you want to speak with an experienced lawyer at our firm, contact our Louisville office to schedule a free initial consultation. Call us at 502-589-5600 or reach us online through our contact form.

First Responders Can Be Held Liable for Accidents They Cause

Those driving police vehicles, fire trucks, and ambulances aren’t legally immune if their negligence causes an accident where someone is severely injured or killed. Depending on the circumstances, they may travel faster than the speed limit, but that doesn’t mean they can drive any way they want when responding to a call.

Police Can Be Liable for Accidents Caused by Negligent Suspect Pursuits

Police can be held liable for accidents caused by an officer chasing a suspect, according to the 2019 state Supreme Court in Gonzalez v. Johnson. That decision overruled a previous decision issued in 1952 (in Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co.) when the court stated there was no liability for police for accidents that happen during a pursuit.

“We now overrule Chambers insofar as it holds an officer cannot be the proximate or legal cause of damage inflicted on a third party by a fleeing suspect. We adopt the…rule that will allow juries to determine whether a pursuing officer’s actions were a substantial factor in causing injury to a third party and apportion fault accordingly.”

The accident at issue happened in 2014. A Scott County sheriff’s vehicle chased suspected drug dealer Kennan McLaughlin’s car. He struck Luis Gonzalez’ vehicle head-on, killing him and severely injuring a passenger who died later. The suspect left the scene on foot and was later captured and convicted of manslaughter.

The Gonzalez family sued the sheriff’s office, and the Fayette Circuit Court dismissed the case due to the Chambers decision. They appealed, and the Supreme Court of Kentucky reversed its 67-year-old precedent.

According to the Gonzalez decision, the chase began under less-than-ideal conditions:

“…it had been raining, making the well-traveled road slippery. Further, the cruiser Deputy Johnson was using that evening was a K-9 unit, and K-9 Officer Hugo was in the back seat. The partition in the cruiser was unlocked, and the restless dog was able to poke his head through the partition into the front seat. Finally, while the lights on Deputy Johnson’s cruiser were functioning, the siren was not. Deputy Johnson claimed he did not realize the siren was broken until two miles into the pursuit. He testified that, though he knew pursuing a suspect without his siren violated (state statute) and the Scott Co. Sheriff Dept.’s practices, he continued the pursuit for about another mile.”

Johnson broke off the pursuit, but shortly afterward, McLaughlin lost control of his vehicle and struck Gonzalez’ vehicle.

The Court Cited Evolving Kentucky Laws as Showing a Need for a Change

The court in Chambers held a police officer’s actions could, as a legal matter, never be the proximate or legal cause of damages suffered by a third party struck by a fleeing suspect. The 1952 court didn’t cite any statutes and created Kentucky law with the decision.

The state Supreme Court in 1980 held that a jury could find a party liable for injuries if a defendant’s actions were “a substantial factor in bringing about the harm suffered by the plaintiff.” Four years later, the state adopted comparative fault, which permits a jury to impose liability on negligence suit parties in proportion to their fault.

The statute concerning police conduct when responding to an emergency states that the law, “does not relieve the driver of any emergency or public safety vehicle from the duty to drive with due regard for the safety of all persons and property upon the highway.” Another statute requires first responders to use warning lights “continuously during the period of the emergency” and the “continuous sounding of the vehicle’s siren, bell, or exhaust whistle…”

The court quoted the Tennessee’s Supreme Court as stating:

“…a police officer’s paramount duty is to protect the public. Unusual circumstances may make it reasonable to adopt a course of conduct which causes a high risk of harm to the public. However, such conduct is not justified unless the end itself is of sufficient social value. The general public has a significant interest in not being subjected to unreasonable risks of injury as the police carry out their duties.”

The court reversed the Gonzalez’ case’s dismissal and sent it back to the trial court to determine if evidence showed the sheriff’s department’s negligence led to Mr. Gonzalez’ death.

Speak To a Satterley & Kelley, PLLC Car Accident Lawyer Today

If a first responder’s negligent actions cause injuries to you or a loved one in a vehicle accident, you may be entitled to compensation for the harm you suffer. Satterley & Kelley PLLC lawyers can protect your interests and legal rights when pursuing an insurance claim or lawsuit.

Schedule a free initial consultation to discuss your accident by calling our Louisville office at 855-385-9532. If it’s more convenient, you may complete our contact form.

Driving While Stoned May Be More Dangerous Than Driving While Drunk

If you don’t use marijuana, you probably know someone who does. About 18% of the US population used marijuana at least once in 2019, according to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That means there could be many people on Kentucky’s roads impaired by cannabis use and causing accidents.

Does Marijuana Use Impair Safe Driving?

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the part of cannabis that causes the plant’s psychoactive effects. THC can impair you in many ways, including:

  • Psychomotor skills which involve tasks that require both thinking and physical movement
  • Ability to multitask, like perceiving the environment around you while controlling your vehicle
  • Ability to keep your vehicle in a lane
  • Cognitive functions

Modern marijuana has evolved over the years to be more potent, so what’s smoked today may have a much greater impact than what may have been available ten years ago. If the driver also drinks alcohol or uses other drugs (legal or illegal), it will probably result in greater impairment.

There’s no known safe level of pot use while driving. Some devices use breath samples to estimate how much alcohol is in a person’s blood, which can be an indication of impairment. But there are no such devices to show the driver’s under the influence of marijuana.

Tests can show the person’s used it in the past, but not if the person is impaired when the test was used. Whether someone’s under pot’s influence could be judged on their actions, appearance, how they talked, and if they smelled like marijuana smoke.

Does Legalizing Marijuana Use Lead to More Traffic Accidents?

Canada legalized recreational marijuana use in 2018. A study of their accidents from 2010 to 2021 found that marijuana-related traffic accidents requiring hospital emergency department treatment increased 475%, according to CNN, while alcohol-related crashes grew 9.4%. Despite the sharp growth, the total number of accidents involving pot was in the hundreds, while there were thousands of alcohol-related accidents.

Just after legalization, when supplies of legal marijuana were limited, there was a 94% increase in emergency room visits. As production increased and sales became more widespread, emergency room visits grew by 233% compared to the time before recreational pot legalization.

A study of US accidents from 2009 to 2019 found mixed results after legalized marijuana sales in different states. Crashes causing injuries ranged from a 7% decrease to an 18% increase, while fatal accident rates ranged from a 10% decrease to a 4% increase.

Is a Stoned Driver More Dangerous Than a Drunk One?

The Canadian car crashes in the study were generally more severe if the driver was impaired by marijuana:

  • Nearly 90% of the marijuana-related accident victims went to nearby hospitals in ambulances. That dropped to 40% if no alcohol or pot was involved
  • Almost half of marijuana-using drivers were admitted to hospitals, while only 6% of those not using it were admitted
  • Almost 22% of accidents involving stoned drivers resulted in intensive care unit admissions, but that happened in less than 2% of crashes without alcohol or cannabis involvement

While alcohol is a depressant, marijuana alters a driver’s perceptions, so they may not fully grasp the situation they’re in. Cannabis use impairs reaction time and the ability to pay attention to multiple events while increasing risk-taking behavior. Those who are impaired may drive faster, be slower to notice hazards, and decelerate slower.

How Would I Seek Compensation for My Injuries When Marijuana Impairs the Other Driver?

Whether the other driver was stoned or not, the issue will be whether their negligence caused the accident that resulted in your injuries. That negligence could be they ran a red light, ignored a yield sign, or weaved in and out of travel lanes. Part of that case could be establishing their marijuana use before the accident, which could be helped by witnesses’ testimony who saw the driver smoke pot or eat edibles.

If the other driver is convicted of driving under the influence, we could show that impairment caused the accident. Using a conviction of a related crime as proof of liability in a civil action is known as negligence per se.

If this happens in your case, it should encourage their insurer to offer a reasonable settlement, but if they don’t, this should speed up and simplify your trial. The jury may also be much more sympathetic to you, the accident victim, than the other driver, who broke the law and endangered others on the road.

Speak To A Satterley & Kelley, PLLC Vehicle Accident Injury Lawyer Today

If you’re the victim of an accident caused by a driver impaired by marijuana, Satterley & Kelley PLLC lawyers can protect your interests and rights to compensation for your injuries and losses. Schedule a free initial consultation so we can discuss your case. Call our Louisville office at 855-385-9532 or complete our contact form if it’s more convenient.

Mesothelioma at Willamette Industries Paper Mill in Hawesville, KY (Podcast)

In this podcast John Maher and Paul Kelley discussed a tragic situation that many former employees, contractors, and visitors of Willamette Industries Paper Mill in Hawesville, KY are facing. This facility had significant amounts of asbestos in it, which puts these people at risk of developing mesothelioma and other asbestos exposure related diseases.

John Maher: Hi, I am John Maher and I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm Satterley & Kelley, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos clams. Today we’re talking about the Willamette Industries Paper Mill in Hawesville, Kentucky. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey John. How are you doing today?

John: I’m well, how are you?

Paul: Doing well, thank you.

Learn About Willamette Industries Paper Mill

John: So, Paul, tell me a little bit about the Willamette Industries Paper Mill and what they do and where they’re located.

Paul: Well, Willamette Paper Mill, it’s now owned by a company called Domtar. But back in the day it was Willamette. They started building that facility in Hawesville, Kentucky in 1967. It’s a paper mill. They make all kinds of different paper products. The first plant was constructed and came online, and it was called the Kentucky Medium Mill. That was in 1967, thereabouts.

And then the second mill was the Bleached Pulp Mill. That came online in the ’69 ’70 timeframe. And then a little bit later, in the early ’80s, came the Fine Paper Mill. All three of these mills were massive facilities.

And the first two for sure, the Kentucky Medium Mill and the Bleached Pulp Mill, they were built at a time where industrial plants were manufactured or constructed with asbestos products. That mill still operates today. So going on almost 50 years now that company has manufactured paper products. It’s a pretty big operation and it provides paper to a lot of industries. And unfortunately, we have seen it as a defendant in several asbestos cases.

How is Willamette Industries Paper Mill Related to Asbestos and Mesothelioma Cases?

John: Yeah. Tell us a little bit more about that, and how the Willamette Industries Paper Mill is related to asbestos and mesothelioma claims.

Paul: Sure. We know from past experience that the first two mills, the Kentucky Medium Mill and the Bleached Pulp Mill, were constructed with lots of asbestos insulation in the facility. There were miles of pipes that ran through the plant, and all those pipes were insulated with asbestos thermal insulation. Again, in 1967, that’s what the industry used to insulate piping in places like that. And then when they built the Bleached Pulp Mill in the ’69-’70 timeframe, the same deal.

There were some other equipment there that had piping connected to it, and the piping to this equipment was all asbestos-insulated. All the piping in the plant usually connected, and there was lots of gaskets that contained asbestos. And there was some tanks that were in the facility that were insulated with asbestos.

There was pumps and motors and valves that all contained asbestos packing or other types of insulation, and just a wide variety of equipment that had to be insulated with asbestos at one point or another.

What Types of Employees at Willamette Industries Paper Mill were Exposed to Asbestos?

John: So then what types of employees might’ve been exposed to asbestos, because of all of this insulation on the piping and gaskets in various places?

Paul: Sure. Predominantly it’s the people that constructed the various plants. We have represented a number of the millwrights, insulators, and electricians that participated in constructing these facilities.

The millwrights, for example, they installed conveyors and some of the actual paper machines themselves. And then they were there during the installation of the piping and the insulation of the piping.

The electricians, a lot of the equipment contained electrical wire and cable. They contained asbestos. And so they were there and stripped and installed a lot of this wire and cable. They were also there during the other installation of the facility. Of course, the insulators, that’s what they did.

The pipe fitters usually installed the gaskets. They were there for the insulation part of it. Sometimes the pipe fitters actually did the insulation of the piping.

So, all the crafts that participated in constructing the facilities: people who worked during the operation of the plant, predominantly your maintenance folks. There were lots of people that just had to tear out a piece of pipe here or there, tear off the insulation. They get exposed. Sometimes they put new on, get exposed.

You had the people who came in and did some of the more substantial overhauls of equipment. That would happen on a fair amount of occasion, where they get the millwrights to come back in and tear out a conveyor and put a new one in. Or they’d get pipe fitters to come in and tear out a whole line of pipes and put new pipes in. And that would happen on occasion.

The pipe insulation and other thermal insulation just deteriorates over time. Sometimes it would fall on plant workers; it just hits these old concrete floors and dust proliferates everywhere. It’d fall on their equipment and dust gets all over their equipment. They used compressed air at the end of a shift to clean off their work space. And all that dust that came from the insulation would fly all over the place.

The plant superintendents and managers and engineers that worked in these facilities; office workers that had to walk through the plant; custodians that had to clean up various parts of the plants, in offices. I mean, all those kinds of people would get exposed on occasion.

And the level of exposure is varied, depending on what you did. If you were in maintenance, you were very heavily exposed: maybe not daily, but frequently. And if you were a office worker, less so but certainly frequently exposed over the course of five, 10, 15 years, for people that worked that long.

They would have people come in later on and conduct asbestos abatement in the facility. So people were actually removing it. They were supposed to be using the safest methods. And I’m not suggesting they didn’t, but there’s still always potential for exposure under those circumstances.

I mean, they’d have fires and things that would happen that would necessitate a need for a short-term repair. And it’d be all hands on deck: “Let’s get the maintenance staff, let’s get outside contractors in to do work.” And then certainly anytime they renovated, anytime they tied on.

For example, when they built the Bleached Pulp Mill, they tied that into the original mill, the Kentucky Medium Mill. So that meant that they had to tie the old pipes into the new pipes and disturb all that insulation, then reinstall the insulation.

So, if you worked in that plant; either as one of the people that constructed it, one of the people that maintained it, one of the people that operated the equipment, or people who supervised and worked in an office setting; there is a virtually guarantee that you’re exposed to asbestos for some period of time. It just varied depending on what your job was.

What Should You Do if You Were Exposed and Now Have Mesothelioma?

John: Right. So if you were an employee of Willamette Industries, or maybe you were one of those outside contractors that was hired to construct the paper mill or come in and do maintenance or something like that, and now you have mesothelioma, what should you do next?

Paul: Well, a couple things. I mean, first of all, most of the people that we see were diagnosed with mesothelioma. It’s a fatal cancer. There is no known cure for it. So it’s really important for you and your family to develop your medical plan and determine how you’re going to fight this cancer. That’s by far more important than anything that I could ever do for you.

But you have legal rights, and that you developed a cancer that is very uniquely associated with asbestos exposure. And it’s important for you to explore and understand what your legal rights are. And it’s important that you do that as quickly as you can.

Time is of the essence. It’s important both from a health standpoint, because you don’t know how long you’re going to have to be able to provide the information to your lawyers necessary to help.

But it’s also important because we have statute of limitations in Kentucky, like most states. And you want to make sure that you get your case, if you file one, that you get it filed on time.

I highly recommend doing your research. We live in a great time where you can learn a lot of information about mesothelioma. You can learn a lot of information about the lawyers that want to work for you and what their experience is. And you should use all those tools that are available to you and find the lawyer that you’re most comfortable with.

My advice is certainly this is a pretty specialized area, and there are a lot of great lawyers out there. But there’s only the relatively small amount of us that do this kind of work. And it’s important to hire somebody who has experience with asbestos, and also has experience with the job sites and the type of products that you were exposed to. And certainly as it relates to Willamette Paper Mill, I mean, my law firm, we’ve handled a number of cases there.

But regardless of what you do, you want somebody that you’re comfortable with. And you want somebody that hopefully will hit the ground running, getting your case filed as quickly as possible, start collecting evidence, start doing all the things necessary to achieve the outcome that you and your family deserve.

It takes time. Despite our best efforts, these lawsuits can take anywhere from 18-months to two years, maybe even longer. So we want to get that case filed pretty quickly to try to shorten that time as much as we can on our end. There’s so many things that we can’t control, but we can control that.

And obviously you want to participate in your case. You want to be able to testify. We want you to be able to testify. Lots of times the best evidence of your exposure is going to come through you. And getting your case filed as quickly as possible is going to give you the best chance.

Also, getting your case filed as quickly as possible is going to give you your best chance to appear at trial, so that you can tell the jury directly what it is that’s happened to you and how this has impacted you.

So it’s critically important that you determine all of your available medical options. And I’m sure that most people are going to have a great medical team and determine the best plan for you and your family. But you really shouldn’t wait to figure all that out before you talk to your attorney, because it might take a few months to figure out your medical care. And that’s a few months that we could spend working, investigating, getting a case filed. So that when you’re ready to dedicate whatever time you need to the lawsuit, we’re ready to do that.

And once you do your part, once you tell us where you’re exposed, how you’re exposed, and you give your deposition, you’ve done what you need to do from a legal standpoint. And you turn it over to us. You let us worry about the case; you worry about your medical care. You spend your time with your family. You do the things that are truly important for your life and for your family and loved ones. And let us worry about your case.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Cases in Kentucky?

John: Yeah. Then finally, can you talk a little bit about the statute of limitations in Kentucky, and how that relates to a mesothelioma cancer case like this?

Paul: I can, and it’s a little harsh in Kentucky. We only have a year from the date that we know or should know we have an injury, and know or should know what the cause of that injury is. It goes by fast.

Now typically, what we always try to do is file that case within a year from the date of diagnosis. That way there’s no risk that a court would dismiss it on statute of limitations grounds. But really, you want to get that case filed as quickly as possible for all the reasons I’ve discussed. The passage of time; just a lot of negative things can happen. You could pass away or become unable to testify. Coworkers could pass away or become unable to testify. Evidence is lost.

So you have a year, and that’s good. I mean, have some time to be able to investigate and figure out what you want to do. But really, we don’t want to get anywhere close to that year. We want to get your case filed as quickly as possible so that we can A), you can participate as much as possible. And B), so that we can get to a quicker resolution, however that’s going to be.

John: All right. Well that’s all really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John. I appreciate it.

Get More Information About Mesothelioma and Asbestos Exposure Cases in Kentucky

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, visit the law firm of Satterley & Kelley at Satterleylaw.com, or call 855-385-9532.

Colleges Have Asbestos in Their Older Buildings

Students come and go, but decades after they were installed, asbestos-containing products in college buildings may remain for the foreseeable future. These schools must abate dangerous asbestos to prevent a health hazard that may present decades from now.

Is Asbestos on College Campuses?

Yes, asbestos is found in college campuses throughout the country. According to the EPA, it’s estimated that 34,800 schools, colleges, and universities have asbestos on campus.

That’s because asbestos-containing products were widely used in large public buildings until the early 1980s, including college dorms, classrooms, and residential halls.

Unless they’re removed, asbestos stays where it is, slowly deteriorating and drying out, possibly releasing cancer-causing asbestos fibers into the air where they can be inhaled or swallowed by anyone passing by.

What Exactly is Asbestos?

Asbestos is the name for a group of naturally occurring mineral fibers that are light, strong, durable, and resistant to heat, fire, electricity, chemicals, and corrosion.

Asbestos has been used in more than 3000 products over the centuries, including as insulation for pipes carrying pressurized steam, floor tiles, wallboard, cement, and vehicle brakes and clutches, according to the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

Why Asbestos is So Dangerous

Asbestos is a well-recognized health hazard. The fibers are too small to be seen with the naked eye and light enough to stay airborne for hours.

Inhaling enough fibers can cause scar-like tissue in the lungs to be so dense that it impairs the ability to breathe (asbestosis). Fibers can also cause lung cancer and mesothelioma, a fatal cancer of the lining of the lungs, chest cavity, abdominal cavity, and abdominal organs that may take up to 40 years to develop.

Where is Asbestos Commonly Found in Schools?

Asbestos had many uses because it was versatile and cheap during its peak use. Asbestos’ key features were its insulating abilities, strength, and durability. Common locations containing asbestos on a college campus could include:

  • Ceiling tiles
  • Acoustical tiles
  • Vinyl flooring (including backing and glue)
  • Wallboard
  • Ductwork insulation
  • Pipe insulation
  • Boiler insulation
  • Cement sheets
  • Textured “popcorn” ceilings
  • Electrical system insulation
  • Paint

Many college campuses expanded and constructed new buildings after World War II to accommodate veterans. At the time, asbestos-containing products were popular construction materials that could be used throughout buildings, from the basement to the roof. The use of these products largely ended by the early 1980s.

Which Campuses Have Asbestos in Their Buildings?

Any college campus building constructed before the early 1980s may have some type of asbestos product. It’s estimated that about 6,000 college and university campuses are in the US. Some of the campuses with asbestos issues include:

University of North Carolina (UNC)

Ten residence halls on UNC’s campus in Chapel Hill have asbestos-containing materials, according to a report released by the university last year, reports The Daily Tar Heel. Those buildings typically house about 2,700 students. About two dozen other buildings were also found to have asbestos.

The amount of asbestos in materials found on the campus ranged from 2% to 75%. Products containing them include:

  • Spray-applied material
  • Plaster
  • Elastomeric coatings (rubbery coatings containing chemical compounds)
  • Floor tiles

The university stated that any damaged or friable asbestos products would be the first to be abated (sealed or removed).

Dartmouth College

This Ivy League university in New Hampshire started abating asbestos in the school’s Alumni Gymnasium in April.

Debris that fell from the gym’s ceiling contained asbestos. According to Athletic Business, the school believes the asbestos is limited to the building’s Office.

Harvard University

The Ivy League college in Boston admitted in 2017 that many of its buildings had asbestos.  The oldest building on campus finished construction in 1720. Harvard was renovating dorms at the time of the announcement.

Administrators stated that asbestos’ presence wasn’t a concern because school administrators supposedly knew where asbestos products were located and abated them when they started falling apart. In 2016, a senior returned to his dorm room and found it covered in asbestos-laced dust that had fallen from the ceiling, reports the Harvard Crimson.

Penn State

Back in 1977, employees at Penn State began complaining about parts of the ceilings falling to the floor. According to a PennLive report, the school tested over 100 buildings and found that the falling materials contained asbestos.

At the time, the estimated cost of removal was $8.5 million, and reports suggest that the school decided the cost wasn’t worth it, which implies it’s still present today.

Now Penn State’s website has information about its buildings containing asbestos.

California State University Long Beach (CSLB)

California State University Long Beach also published information on its website as recently as December 2024 with a full list of all the buildings on campus containing asbestos.

There are over 65 buildings on the list, many with asbestos found in multiple locations.

The California Health and Safety Code Section 25915 requires them to provide written notice to employees to inform them about asbestos presence in buildings.

Get Help If You’re Diagnosed With an Asbestos-Related Disease

If you or a loved one worked or studied at a college or university and were later found to have lung cancer or mesothelioma, contact Satterley & Kelley, PLLC, because you may be entitled to compensation for the harm you suffer.

We have more than 30 years of collective experience representing injury victims in asbestos litigation, and we can represent you, too. Call us at 855-385-9532, locally 502-589-5600, or contact us online to arrange a free initial consultation with a Satterley & Kelley PLLC lawyer.

Can You Take Legal Action if Your Child is Injured?

If your child is injured because of another party’s negligence or intentional act, you may be able to pursue an insurance claim or lawsuit for compensation for that injury. There are some unique requirements for these legal actions, but overall, the issues and laws involving these cases are the same as if an adult is injured.

What Types of Injuries Could Be Covered?

Not all injuries, whether to a child or an adult, are worth an insurance claim or lawsuit. They may be minor, or the injured party may be mostly or completely at fault, so the potential recovery is too small to justify the expense and effort needed in these cases.

However, legal action may be worth considering if an injury is severe or fatal and another party played a role in causing it. These types of injuries include those caused by the following:

Vehicle Accidents

If your child is in a vehicle involved in an accident and injured, they can be compensated for the harm they suffer. For vehicle accident cases, a common defense is that one party is at least partially to blame for the crash.

An injured child as a passenger in a car seat or belted in could not have done anything to prevent the accident or their injuries.

The party responsible for the injuries may be the one driving the vehicle your child was in, the driver of another car, or a party that’s responsible for dangerous conditions that led to the accident.

Pedestrian and Bicycle Accidents

A child getting struck by a vehicle as a pedestrian may suffer life-altering injuries. You must teach your child about safety and how to walk and bike on roads. If the accident is the result of your child darting out into the street without looking, you may have a difficult case to prove.

Kentucky law requires those under 12 to use bike helmets. If they suffer head injuries in a bicycle accident and aren’t using one, the driver may not be held responsible, or the damages award may be limited. Even if they’re 12 or older, the fact they’re not using a helmet could be used against them

Crimes

Parents can take legal action if their child was injured (physically or emotionally) due to a crime. The perpetrator and others may be held accountable.

If your child is being supervised by a school, church, or other organization that’s negligent in screening its employees or volunteers or fails to manage them properly, and your child is sexually abused or assaulted, that church, organization, or school may be liable for the harm they cause. If your child is attacked at school by another student, their parents and the school might be responsible

Slip and Fall Accidents

Property owners and those running commercial businesses must keep their premises safe for all those using them to reasonably prevent slip and fall accidents.

If they fail to take proper precautions or actions to repair a dangerous situation and your child falls and is seriously injured, they may be held liable.

Dog Bites

Dog owners are responsible for the injuries their dogs cause. Children are especially vulnerable to serious injuries caused by an aggressive dog.

So if your child is attacked or bit by a dog, you can seek financial damages from the owner.

Drowning Accidents

If your child is with others and is swimming in a pool or lake, if those supervising or hosting them are negligent, they may be liable for the harm they cause.

This also applies to water parks that are paid to provide a safe environment for customers.

Medical Malpractice

Serious medical mistakes can affect a patient for as long as they live.

For a child, that impairment or disability could last for decades and impact their ability to do well at school, earn an income, socialize with others, and their overall quality of life.

Sports Injuries

Some sports, even when correctly played, carry a risk of injury. But that doesn’t mean your child has no rights if they’re injured.

If another player goes well beyond the rules and hurts your child, or referees look the other way when play becomes dangerous, there may be a basis for legal action. Coaches may also be responsible if they put players in danger by having them play when they’re injured, don’t allow them to hydrate, ignore their medical needs, or encourage dangerous and violent play.

Even if you signed a waiver for participation, that shouldn’t prevent you from contacting a lawyer and discussing your options because it may not be enforceable.

Speak To A Personal Injury Attorney Today

If someone else’s negligent or intentional acts injured your child, Satterley & Kelley PLLC attorneys are here to help. We will be with you every step of the way, protecting their best interests and ensuring your child gets the compensation they deserve. You do not have to deal with this alone.

To take advantage of a free initial consultation where you can discuss what happened and your legal rights, call our office in Louisville at 502-589-5600 (toll-free at 855-385-9532). You may also complete our contact form if it’s more convenient.

Mesothelioma at Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, IN (Podcast)

In this podcast, John Maher and Paul Kelley discuss what happened in Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, IN. This plant is known for having many employees, contractors, and others exposed to asbestos, which puts them at serious risk for developing mesothelioma and other related diseases.

John Maher: Hi, I’m John Maher and I’m here today with Paul Kelley. Paul is a partner with the Kentucky personal injury law firm, Satterley & Kelley, which has over 45 years of collective experience in litigating mesothelioma and asbestos claims. Today, we’re talking about mesothelioma at the Warrick Power Plant in Newburgh, Indiana. Welcome, Paul.

Paul Kelley: Hey, John. How’s it going today?

John: I’m well, how are you, Paul?

Paul: Doing fantastic. Thank you.

What is Warrick Power Plant and Where are They Located?

John: Good. So Paul, tell us a little bit about the Warrick Power Plant and what they are, what they do, and where they’re located.

Paul: Sure. So the Warrick Power Plant Powerhouse, it’s located in Newburgh Indiana, and it’s actually for all intents and purposes, it’s next door to the Alcoa plant, which is aluminum producing plant. And actually, Warrick predominantly supported the Alcoa plant. But in addition, Warrick also provides power to other facilities and other customers in the Indiana, that Newburgh Indiana area.

The plant started operation in 1960 ultimately, and we’ll talk a little bit more about powerhouses, but basically a powerhouse has a turbine and a boiler. And the turbine creates the energy and the boiler creates the steam, which goes to the turbine to create the energy. So we’ll refer to it as a unit. So every unit has a turbine and a boiler. So there were four units at the Warrick Powerhouse, and all four units were built between 1960 and 1970. The last one being built in 1970 and went online in 1970.

And so, three of those units are actually owned by Alcoa. And the fourth unit is owned by a company called SIGECO. It’s Southern Indiana Gas and Electric Company. And I believe that SIGECO operates all the units. So Alcoa owned three and SIGECO owns one and operates all four of them. And so powerhouses were infamous for having lots of asbestos. And turbines and boilers contain asbestos, and there were lots of different products. And we can talk about that in a minute. But basically from 1960 to 1970, this plant was built, and I believe that it’s still in full and complete operation today.

The Alcoa plant, I think it’s still in operation. Steam turbines and they’re coal operated plants are starting to be phased out. And so this one, if it hasn’t already been, it will be. But for 50 to 60 years, it provided power to both the Alcoa plant as well as to other customers in the Newburg, Indiana area.

Was Asbestos Used at Warrick Power Plant?

John: Yeah, so talk a little bit more about asbestos and where and why that was used in the Warrick Power Plant.

Paul: So asbestos is an excellent heat retention product. Power houses generate an incredible amount of heat. The boilers are thousands of degrees producing heat. The turbines have lots of heat. And so asbestos insulation in particular was a great heat retention product. And so the turbines were insulated with asbestos. They usually had a block insulation material that went over it, and then there would be muds that would use to fix it. There were some periods of time where they used the big asbestos blanket that they wrapped the outer shell of the turbine.

With all the piping containing asbestos, the valves that were connected to the piping were covered with asbestos. These boilers are many stories buildings. Imagine a seven or eight story building. That’s what these boilers are. And the boilers have fire brick and refractory material. Sometimes the outer shells of the turbines, or I’m sorry, parts of the boilers contain asbestos. All the piping that was connected to the boilers contained asbestos. So that’s just the turbine and the boiler. You have miles of pipes that goes throughout a power house.

Most of those pipes carry steam. All the steam lines were covered with asbestos insulation. Some of those pipes contain high temperature chemicals. Those would also be insulated with asbestos. Lots of the pipes were connected with asbestos containing gaskets. You had things like precipitators and smoke stacks and all kinds of different types of equipment that required high temperature that were all insulated with asbestos. You had valves and motors and pumps that were insulated with either packing or some other type of insulating material because of the high temperature associated with motors, for example.

Sometimes they had equipment there that contained breaks. These were industrial type breaks that contained asbestos. Even offices in some of these plants would’ve a ceiling tile and floor tile that contained asbestos. And so much thermal insulation, so many gaskets, so many valves and pumps that were all stuffed with asbestos packing. It was a wide variety of stuff.

Given the time period that this plant was constructed, all four units contained asbestos. All four turbines were originally insulated with asbestos. All four boilers were originally insulated with asbestos. And it was pervasive throughout the facility. And my educated guess is that if you went into that facility today, you’d still see a lot of asbestos that’s there. Hopefully it’s protected, but it’s still there.

What Types of Employees Were Exposed to Asbestos at Warrick Power Plant?

John: Right. So the asbestos was all over the place in this plant. Who were some of the employees or types of employees that might’ve been exposed to that asbestos?

Paul: The short answer is everybody, but the long answer is certainly they’re in the construction phase. It takes a lot of people to build a powerhouse, and they were fairly well building it continuously over that ten year period of time. And so certainly everybody that participated in building it, you’d get a wide variety of crafts that built it. We’ve represented electricians, insulators, and pipe fitters. If I didn’t say millwrights, those type of crafts.

So, the millwrights put in a lot of the equipment. Conveyors. You had coal that was used to heat the boilers and so they would build conveyors. They built scaffolding. They built all kinds of different types of conveyors. They’d set a lot of the equipment and they would be there during the insulation phase. Insulators, I mean, I told you before, all that plant had to be insulated. Some of the insulators were just there constantly insulating pipes and boilers and turbines and equipment. The pipe fitters who installed all those miles of pipes and they were present when all those pipes were insulated.

I mean, electricians have to connect all that equipment together. They have to work on the boilers, they have to work on the turbines. They have to work with asbestos insulated wire and cable. They had to set motors. They had to connect equipment to motors. Of course, the boilermakers. Boilermakers are the ones that built the boilers. They’re the ones that had to get inside the boilers and build the tubes. And sometimes they were present during the installation of the fire brick and refractory material.

The engineers that participated in designing and building, they had to oversee the project. They were there during the insulation phase. So certainly everybody that was there during construction. Well, when they put unit one up and they started building unit two, the people that are now operating unit one, they’re exposed both to the operation of the equipment in unit one that contain asbestos. And they’re also being exposed to what’s going on in unit two. I mean, these units weren’t super close together, but they were close enough.

So frequently we would hear that people would walk through unit two during the construction phase from time to time, and they were exposed even if they weren’t participating in that. Operating this equipment, a power plant is just a unique place. It’s loud, lots of vibrations in the plant, lots of insulation that deteriorates and falls down on people. Lots of maintenance activities where pipe fitters and other maintenance workers are tearing off insulation and exposing the people below them.

They would overhaul these turbines and boilers every so often, usually four or five, six years, depends on what the needs. And when they do that, they have to completely shut it down. They tear off all the insulation. They rip out all the fire brick in the boilers. They remove all the gaskets and then lots of times tear the packing out. These gaskets, once they are put on the pipes, I mean just absolutely affixed. The best I can describe it is if you stick a piece of gum on something and it sticks there for a long time, it just doesn’t come off in one piece. You’ve got to scrape it off.

And that’s what folks had to do with the gaskets. That’s what they had to do frequently with the packing and these valves. The pipe insulation, I mean it’d just crumble apart right in your breathing zone when it was occurring. We’ve had millwrights that participate in the overhauls. So it’s hard to explain without visual, but a turbine is usually a 50 to 75 foot vessel. And there are pipes above it and below it. And so, lots of times the millwrights would have to go below the turbine floor where there’s all these pipes that are all insulated, and they would actually stand on the pipes while they’re working on the turbine itself.

And all these pipes are insulated, and all the insulation is just pouring off the pipe because it’s deteriorated by this point. And just again, imagine just taking your finger and you could just crush it with your finger. It just comes apart. And then all that dust proliferates and you are in a very enclosed tight space. And so that’s just one example. But if you had somebody who’s highly specialized and educated person who’s running the plant, they’re exposed every day. The people that work in the office who answer the phones to procure products, they’re exposed on a frequent basis. People who deliver products are exposed on a frequent basis. Plant visitors.

I mean, I hear from people all the time who, well, we have a pretty good engineering school at the University of Louisville called the Speed School, and they had a co-op program. And so a lot of these kids, when they were going through their education, they would get sent to power houses. That was their co-op job, learning on the job. And they’re sent to a power house to participate in some aspect of either construction or operation, maintenance, over hall, whatever. And these twenty-year-old kids that don’t know anything are being exposed to asbestos.

So, it’s a very difficult environment and power houses aren’t clean. They are very dusty and dirty places. And because of the high temperature, they had to reinsulate a lot because that insulation would deteriorate within a year or two. And so they were just constantly removing and reinstalling. And yeah, there became a point in time where they replaced with non-asbestos stuff. But it sure did take a long time to get to that point. And we’re talking deep into the seventies, if not eighties before new asbestos came on or new non-asbestos came on. But certainly they didn’t just come through and take all the old off in one shot.

It’s still there today. They take it off as needed and people were frequently exposed. And there just really wasn’t much way to avoid it if you went into that plant and did anything from the time that it was built through probably the late eighties, early nineties.

What Should You Do if You Were Exposed to Asbestos at Warrick Power Plant?

John: So, if you were exposed to asbestos or potentially exposed because you worked at the Warrick Power Plant, what should you do next?

Paul: Well, I think it’s important to determine your legal rights. It’s obviously important to determine your legal rights. We have had a number of cases from that plant. There are entities that can be held accountable. Who those entities are going to depend on your personal situation. But I think it’s important to consult with a lawyer immediately and try to figure out whether you have a case and then determine whether the attorneys counsel you on how to pursue that case.

Of course, you’ve got a medical diagnosis that’s difficult. Mesothelioma is a very difficult disease. It’s almost always fatal, and it’s very important that you get your medical plan in place and determine what treatment you’re going to do. From a standpoint of what we do, we don’t necessarily have an opinion as to how you should pursue your medical care, except you should certainly find the best doctors in the country to help you do that and then determine the best plan for you and your family. While you’re doing that, ideally, we’re out there doing what we do.

And if you come to us and you worked at the Warrick Power Plant, we can probably get a case filed pretty quickly because we know the defendants and the parties that provided asbestos to that plant. But time is always of the essence. It’s of the essence because of your medical situation and the potential consequences of the diagnosis of mesothelioma. And it’s also of the essence because unfortunately, you don’t have a ton of time under the law to pursue your case. It’s also of the essence because your co-workers are older and people that worked in the plant who can provide product identification and tell us what was there or testify about what was there, they’re getting older and there’s fewer of them today.

So, we want to be able to identify all those people and get them deposed, get you deposed. So it’s unfortunate. I wish I could tell people that they had more time and they could figure it all out, but you don’t have a lot of time. You don’t have a lot of time to figure out your medical plan. And you don’t have a lot of time to figure out your legal plan. And so it’s important to identify lawyers that not only practice mesothelioma cases, but have had experience with a particular location that you worked at or locations that you worked at, because that could have a critical impact on how quickly a case can get filed.

And the quicker that the case gets filed, the quicker resolution comes to you and your family. It can take a long time to finalize the case from beginning to end. So if it takes six months to get a case on file, well, it’s probably going to take at least two years, two and a half years, to completely wrap the case up. It may not seem like the difference between two months and six months is a huge difference, but for somebody with a terminal cancer, it’s a huge difference.

What is the Statute of Limitations for Mesothelioma Cases?

John: And then another thing that you run into with mesothelioma cases is the statute of limitations. Can you talk a little bit about what the statute of limitations is in Indiana and how that relates or affects a mesothelioma claim like this?

Paul: Absolutely. In Indiana, you have two years basically from either the date of diagnosis or when or should know that you have a disease and what the cause of that disease is to file a claim. So it’s better than… I do a lot of cases in Kentucky and we only have one year. So two years better than one, but it certainly goes by fast. And as I’ve mentioned, you really don’t want to get anywhere close to that. You want to try to get that case filed as quickly as possible. You don’t want to run the risk that the judge disagrees with you and thinks you should have filed your case sooner. But more importantly, you just want to get that case filed so that you have a meaningful opportunity to participate in the case.

The statistics are not real good for prognosis for people with mesothelioma. It’s typically six months to 18 months from the time of diagnosis. There are certainly people, thank goodness, who live for years following diagnosis. But most people fit within that period of time. So getting the case filed and moving it along while you’re still able to participate, that’s our goal. We know that our clients, they want help for themselves and they want the peace of mind that what we’re doing is hopefully going to help their family. And they just want to be able to see that that’s happening before something terrible happens and they succumb to the disease.

John: All right. Well, that’s really great information, Paul. Thanks again for speaking with me today.

Paul: Thank you, John. I appreciate it.

Get More Information About Asbestos Exposure Cases

John: And for more information about mesothelioma and asbestos exposure, you can visit the law firm of Satterley and Kelly at Satterleylaw.com or call 855-385-9532.